11-09-2016, 03:05 PM
(11-09-2016, 02:11 PM)RTBoss Wrote:(11-09-2016, 10:56 AM)Shannon Wrote: I am confused... I think there is some point of reference missing. What are you saying with regards to V1, V2.4 and V2.5?
I wrote in this journal that I was taking time off from V2.5 to possibly run V1 or go back to V2.4 - you released V1 again saying you were wanting feedback?
I then said I thought I'd just go back to V2.4, as it was very effective with the clearing modules for me (so much so I got into executing the non-clearing parts of the script, I believe). Then after a week of clearing, I'd go back to V2.5 until V3.0.1 came out.
You then asked my logic for that decision. I explained, then in my next post was asking if you preferred me to run V1 over going back to V2.4 (for feedback purposes).
Thanks, I was under the impression you were running V1 but I could not find where you said you switched, so it became confusing.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!