08-15-2016, 09:42 PM
(08-15-2016, 09:00 PM)Steven Wrote: Shannon,
On other potential aspects of disinhibition
a) responders feel it is their destinies to repeatedly fulfill the goals of the program with the user
b) responders feel swept away when around the user to the degree that they repeatedly fulfill the goals of the program with the user
c) responders feel their guilt, fear, and shame eliminated, alleviated, (more thesaurus words) about repeatedly fulfilling the goals of the program with the user in such ways that they repeatedly fulfill the goals of the program with the user
d) responders feel relieved when they spend time with, see, and have sex with the user, and they experience that relief in just the right quality and quantity that it automatically leads to them repeatedly fulfilling the goals of the program with the user
e) responders feel swept away when they think about the user to the degree that they repeatedly fulfill the goals of the program with the user
f) responders feel anticipation about fulfilling the goals of the program with the user, and that anticipation is always positive and experienced in such a way that it automatically leads to responders repeatedly fulfilling the goals of the program with the user
On self-justification
a) responders feel and know there is “just something about” the user in such ways they repeatedly fulfill the goals of the program with the user
b) responders feel and know there is just something about the user that is beyond words, and they feel and know that in such ways they repeatedly fulfill the goals of the program with the user
c) responders feel and know there is “just something about” the user that responders feel and know that only they understand and only they could possibly understand (and no one else could possibly understand) and they feel and know all that in such ways they repeatedly fulfill the goals of the program with the user
d) repsonders know and feel that if anyone tries to talk them out of it, undermine their self-confidence about the user, tries to undermine any good feelings about the user, tries to change their mind, tries to sabotage it, or do anything that is not supportive of them repeated fulfilling the goals of the program with the user, then the responders know and feel that others are being negative out of jealousy and envy and that further reinforces responders' determination, resolve, and persistence to repeatedly fulfill the goals of the program with the user
Pretty good suggestions.
After thinking about what I said above and what that "it" factor is that we are missing I truly believe that "it" factor for woman (could apply to a degree for men as well) is emotions. To me Generally (though not always true) is that men to a greater degree are more logical and women are more emotionally prone. I remember reading a Canadian study that observed the differences between men and women in a debate setting. They noticed that male debaters used more logic while debating while females used more emotion or appeals to emotion in their debates. Therefore, I think something like the following would really amp up the results:
"The woman (or responder) exposed to the aura feels to a huge degree all the emotions needed for her to achieve the goals of the programs while simultaneously feels to a lesser degree than normal all the emotions that would get in the way of achieving the goals of the program."
Don't know if that would be the correct wording but something in that direction would be what I think would work. I see it as a check list. Everyone has an individualized checklist (While sober anyway) that need to be met before they would have sex with someone. For some it might be more physical (Does she have big boobs, does she have a big butt, Does he have money, Does he have a six pack) but a lot of the time, especially for women, I believe its emotional (Does this person make me "feel' all these different emotions so I would be up to having sex with this person?).
"I have no use of disciples. Let everyone be their own true follower" - Nietzsche