08-14-2016, 07:08 PM
(08-14-2016, 06:51 PM)THolt Wrote:(08-14-2016, 06:39 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-14-2016, 04:08 PM)THolt Wrote:(08-14-2016, 03:55 PM)Shannon Wrote: Sounds like it would be worth releasing 2.3 and 2.4 as a 2 stage set. 2.4 could be stage 1, and 2.3 stage 2. Of course we still have to see 2.3 actually perform, but that's coming soon enough.
Will there ever be a "final" version of DSMI or will you keep tinkering with it even when you start developing it in 6G?
I'm going to do everything I can do to make it achieve the design goals.* Once it's in full 6G, there's not likely to be much more I can do with it than that - but if there is, I may be willing to rebuild it, depending on how much free time I have. 6G is aimed at being the absolute best possible technology set I can create. And let me tell you, based on what I am seeing just from P4 alone, I think we are looking at it being a good bet that DMSI in 6G will achieve the design goals if they are at all possible to achieve.
EDIT: * Within the boundaries of not directly manipulating someone's ability to make their own free-will decisions.
I think the 6G version of every program will be the best
That would seem a logical conclusion.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!