Shannon's DMSI V2.2 Journal

[K-Train]

This post is moreso aimed at Rayhon and Chaosvrgn but shout out to Bits for the great post.

Anyway, I believe one of the principle issues faced now which Rayhon and Chaos indirectly showcased, is that the term misogyny has been incorrectly applied so much that its true definition has been perverted. Due to the fact that certain groups of people (both male and female) have attempted to use the term in an effort to attack and invalidate their opponents the term's true meaning has been lost. This is leading to more people incorrectly applying the term to individuals who are willing to disagree with, challenge, and criticize women.

Yes, they've expanded the definition so society can vilify every man as a "misogynist" if he points out bad female behavior. Seriously, look at that definition and critically analyze it. Who in their right minds believes that "hatred" and "mistrust" are mutually exclusive? If I'm suspicious of something, that means I automatically hate it?

HAHAHAHAHA, I totally agree man. I don't understand that at all. There are people in my life that I love but I don't trust them to do certain things not out of hate but because of the knowledge I possess either out of experience or intuition that leads me to believe that when it comes to a particular situation or action that I lack faith in their ability to accomplish said action or perform in that particular situation.

But there's a universal law called the principle of rhythm. The pendulum swing manifests in everything, and it's about to explode in the global elite's faces.

Once again on point. I've warned people about this before.

The phenomenon you're incorrectly calling "misogyny" is basically men realizing that this system is not worth investing in and as a result, they're rebelling in droves. Completely rejecting the system and checking out. They have no desire to be honorable, or zen, or whatever, because THOSE are character traits that would benefit the system. Honor means nothing for the man who lives for himself and himself alone. They aren't "attracting bad women." They're going for "bad women" (if such a thing exists) because, in their current state of being, a woman serves no purpose to them other than satiating their sexual thirsts.

I want to state right now that there are individuals in this group who do fit the bill for a misogynist but its definitely (IMO) not all of them or a majority. Otherwise I agree with most of this. I remember Alan Roger Currie stating (paraphrasing of course) that "beta males" help stimulate the economy. If more guys thought the way Shannon, CV, Sick, Rayhon, Bits, and some of the other guys on here thought...the economy (or specific parts of it) would crash. So for some of these companies they need males to think a certain way. But this is encroaching upon a different discussion.