(07-21-2016, 12:49 AM)Natious Wrote:(07-20-2016, 02:55 AM)Ivaylo Wrote: Over the last week I've been torn between E2 and DMSI as my next sub. I've decided to give E2 a try for 32 days and see how I feel afterward. The main criteria I'll be using is whether I'm seeing myself express more of BASE's programming. Bird feeding (the metaphor some of the guys have used) would be a step in the opposite direction and I can at least rely on DMSI to spring me into (some kind of) action, while also doing a bit of clearing.
I'm aware I'm setting myself up with an excuse to give in to my lower instincts with DMSI after 32 days, but I'm confident I'll have the necessary willpower to do the right thing. I'm in this for the long run.
I'm finishing up with BASE tomorrow. I'll do a longer review of my whole experience sometime during my break before E2.
Well, I have finished AM6 for 1 full run and didn't get any noticeable results from it. That was like 1.5 years ago. It's not until now (~100 days of E2) that I have noticed some improvements that could possibly be linked to having run AM6. I can't say for sure because this could be E2 alone, but if I'm right then E2 can remove a lot of the stuff that was previously impeding some of the results and thus the results for previous programs can appear while running E2.
From my personal experience E2 is the most potent sub Shannon has created to this date.
I think you're right - E2 *can* unleash some of the programming that you were resisting before. I distinctly remember Shannon saying that somewhere.
Anyway, E2 is potent, I've got no doubts about that. I did a 2-hour run a while ago and I definitely got a taste of what's in store. I'm just not sure how it will affect my real time behavior when I run it full time - hopefully I can still keep my productivity up.
Heavysm reports some drop in income after he switched from BASE to E2, but he also reports different behavioral changes from what I experienced during those 2 hours, so it's going to be a worthwhile experiment.
