The models aren't based on Tarot. The Tarot is too limited for that - 78 "words" in the entire language; not nearly enough information resolution on that alone. There is a little bit of information I discovered as a result of mastering the Tarot in use in the models, but it's not really something that is "Tarot specific". It was something that I noticed was true of all accurate methods for prognostication. But the models are far and away more complex than a Tarot reading, or even a series of them.
This book was my personal notebook for a long time, as I could not remember everything in the subject and no other books were really going where I was going. Eventually I published it to keep a promise. It's never been very popular, and I don't advertise it. But it has a LOT of useful information in it.
I am long since "retired" from doing readings for others. I never was good at reading for money, never felt comfortable with it, and regardless of what I said or did, people inevitably heard what they wanted to hear, not what I said about their reading. So I quit.
The models use a very complex database and matrix system that gives me as much information resolution as I like, and it can be scaled into the millions of "Irxels" (Information resolution "pixels") and beyond, where Tarot has 78 words, and readings are usually 1 to 30 irxels equivalent. The drawback is that while the number of irxels increases the amount of precision and accuracy, it correspondingly increases the processing time does too. Even in the fastest computers I can get my hands on, more than a few hundred thousand irxels is torturously slow. I usually work in a range of around 100,000 irxels.
So not much in common between them.
I wish it was that simple though. It's sure a lot easier to use Tarot cards.
This book was my personal notebook for a long time, as I could not remember everything in the subject and no other books were really going where I was going. Eventually I published it to keep a promise. It's never been very popular, and I don't advertise it. But it has a LOT of useful information in it.
I am long since "retired" from doing readings for others. I never was good at reading for money, never felt comfortable with it, and regardless of what I said or did, people inevitably heard what they wanted to hear, not what I said about their reading. So I quit.
The models use a very complex database and matrix system that gives me as much information resolution as I like, and it can be scaled into the millions of "Irxels" (Information resolution "pixels") and beyond, where Tarot has 78 words, and readings are usually 1 to 30 irxels equivalent. The drawback is that while the number of irxels increases the amount of precision and accuracy, it correspondingly increases the processing time does too. Even in the fastest computers I can get my hands on, more than a few hundred thousand irxels is torturously slow. I usually work in a range of around 100,000 irxels.
So not much in common between them.
I wish it was that simple though. It's sure a lot easier to use Tarot cards.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
