Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Benjamin - 12-04-2020

Sale is now on.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 12-04-2020

(12-04-2020, 01:29 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: Hi @Shannon ill be quick. Im considering trying out masked for OF, rather the current US incase my phones preventing it from working effectively. You gave me specific instructions to listen at a volume of 13/15 through my phone, does that still apply if I use masked?

Masked is gentler than hybrid correct and thus I thought the better option to try, yes?

thank you

If you use Masked format, you should try masked at a volume that is comfortable to listen to.  Make sure the highs are not too high volume and the lows are still audible on the ocean surf track, and then that should work for the trickling stream, too.  

Masked is not as aggressive as Ultrasonic or hybrid.  If the issue you have with ultrasonic is too much too fast, then masked should get more results.  You can also try lowering the volume with the ultrasonic.  I would use masked before trying that though.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 12-04-2020

(12-04-2020, 01:49 PM)Benjamin Wrote: Sale is now on.

Thank you, Ben.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Jake2015 - 12-04-2020

(12-04-2020, 02:20 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-04-2020, 01:29 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: Hi @Shannon ill be quick. Im considering trying out masked for OF, rather the current US incase my phones preventing it from working effectively. You gave me specific instructions to listen at a volume of 13/15 through my phone, does that still apply if I use masked?

Masked is gentler than hybrid correct and thus I thought the better option to try, yes?

thank you

If you use Masked format, you should try masked at a volume that is comfortable to listen to.  Make sure the highs are not too high volume and the lows are still audible on the ocean surf track, and then that should work for the trickling stream, too.  

Masked is not as aggressive as Ultrasonic or hybrid.  If the issue you have with ultrasonic is too much too fast, then masked should get more results.  You can also try lowering the volume with the ultrasonic.  I would use masked before trying that though.

Thanks Shannon, so the reason for going to mask is because im feeling that my phone cant play US so may as well try masked. Only hesitation is whether it will interfer with my sleep or not so ill give it a shot tonight and see.

ok thank you ill give that a shot with ocean or trickling and see but do I need to calibrate ocean first to be able play trickling stream, thats my understanding yes?

thank you


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 12-04-2020

(12-04-2020, 04:09 PM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(12-04-2020, 02:20 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-04-2020, 01:29 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: Hi @Shannon ill be quick. Im considering trying out masked for OF, rather the current US incase my phones preventing it from working effectively. You gave me specific instructions to listen at a volume of 13/15 through my phone, does that still apply if I use masked?

Masked is gentler than hybrid correct and thus I thought the better option to try, yes?

thank you

If you use Masked format, you should try masked at a volume that is comfortable to listen to.  Make sure the highs are not too high volume and the lows are still audible on the ocean surf track, and then that should work for the trickling stream, too.  

Masked is not as aggressive as Ultrasonic or hybrid.  If the issue you have with ultrasonic is too much too fast, then masked should get more results.  You can also try lowering the volume with the ultrasonic.  I would use masked before trying that though.

Thanks Shannon, so the reason for going to mask is because im feeling that my phone cant play US so may as well try masked. Only hesitation is whether it will interfer with my sleep or not so ill give it a shot tonight and see.

ok thank you ill give that a shot with ocean or trickling and see but do I need to calibrate ocean first to be able play trickling stream, thats my understanding yes?

thank you

Your phone can play ultrasonic just fine, Jake.

Yes, for fine tuning, use the ocean surf to set volume.  That should be right for trickling stream as well.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Jake2015 - 12-04-2020

(12-04-2020, 04:15 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-04-2020, 04:09 PM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(12-04-2020, 02:20 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-04-2020, 01:29 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: Hi @Shannon ill be quick. Im considering trying out masked for OF, rather the current US incase my phones preventing it from working effectively. You gave me specific instructions to listen at a volume of 13/15 through my phone, does that still apply if I use masked?

Masked is gentler than hybrid correct and thus I thought the better option to try, yes?

thank you

If you use Masked format, you should try masked at a volume that is comfortable to listen to.  Make sure the highs are not too high volume and the lows are still audible on the ocean surf track, and then that should work for the trickling stream, too.  

Masked is not as aggressive as Ultrasonic or hybrid.  If the issue you have with ultrasonic is too much too fast, then masked should get more results.  You can also try lowering the volume with the ultrasonic.  I would use masked before trying that though.

Thanks Shannon, so the reason for going to mask is because im feeling that my phone cant play US so may as well try masked. Only hesitation is whether it will interfer with my sleep or not so ill give it a shot tonight and see.

ok thank you ill give that a shot with ocean or trickling and see but do I need to calibrate ocean first to be able play trickling stream, thats my understanding yes?

thank you

Your phone can play ultrasonic just fine, Jake.

Yes, for fine tuning, use the ocean surf to set volume.  That should be right for trickling stream as well.

Thanks Shannon again. The reason I felt it didnt play US was cos I used the speaker test on the phone and got a swooshing sound on both my newer s10 samsung phone as my older s7 phone.

Also im now on cycle 5 and still nothing. I admitted I had to restart the cycles as I stopped due to the mess I went through and stress with the girl but I restarted soon as I could and reached cycle 5 with nothing noticed.

So was going to give masked a go but if you say my phone can play US just fine then ok ill stick with US.

thank you again


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - CatMan - 12-05-2020

(12-02-2020, 09:21 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-02-2020, 12:27 AM)Kol Wrote: Hell yeah I want to be in. @Shannon does this mean this installment of OF 5.75.5G will be in the upcoming DMSI release? Also, am I correct to say that, as fear is root of it all, that OF/FRM is the key to FRM 5.0?

Allow me to clarify how I'm doing this.  

Fear Removal Module 4.9 is the module that is being used as the Key Script for Overcoming Fear.  That means the FRM is the goal of the program, and the rest of the skeleton script supports that goal.  But in other programs, the FRM is not the Key Script.  It is part of the Skeleton Script, which is what supports the Key Script.

So FRM is the key to OF, and the key to FRM 5.0 is something I haven't figured out yet.  Basically I'm not yet sure how to advance FRM 4.9 to 5.0, but I have identified some things that will enable the skeleton script to better support the FRM, thus allowing for better execution of FRM 4.9 without changing it's script.

It would be about like tuning a race car by improving all the components without upgrading the engine.  I'm not a car guy, but let's say we improve airflow to the engine, and we make the cooling better and we improve the efficiency of the engine by tweaking the timing, and we tweak the gear ratios, adjust the tire pressure, use better oil, add nitro and perhaps new spark plugs.  The same engine is now going to put out more power and perform better than before. 

That's sort of like what I am able to do right now by using FRM 4.9 in a newer, more advanced and better focused, tweaked and tuned skeleton script.

There's about 5-6+ orders at least now it seems for a new OF. Awesome! You could probably do one for E4 after too. Easy money for you, and since many of us are spinning our wheels now due to the pandemic issue...makes sense to dig deep with such programs to prepare for the post-pandemic world and future execution of other subs.

Is a new OF something you can do along side LTU Stage 5? Seems like it could be based off your past words.

Also, how are things with DMSI coming? Saw you mention a possibility with it recently, so I was curious.

Thanks, Shannon!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - AriGold - 12-05-2020

Count me in for an upcoming OF.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - ichigo - 12-05-2020

Hey Shannon, hope all is well!

I'm running Overcome ED 5G. I'm thinking about getting Sex Drive Maximizer to help out, I saw you say to somebody else that SDM would be a good choice for erection quality because of how it optimizes hormones for sexual arousal. I was thinking something like:

-10 hours Overcome ED
-2 loops SDM (the "in the moment" amount)

Per day. Would I be okay with a listening pattern like this, seeing as the goals kind of link into each other, or do you think it's better to just focus on one of them? And if so, my priority is trying to achieve rock hard erections, which one would you recommend I use?

Thanks!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Lowe - 12-05-2020

I have been using the new USLM since it came out, so about 6 weeks. No noticeable effect except vivid dreams.

Interestingly, the two nights when I skipped listening (by mistake, not from instruction) were two nights when dreams were most intense. One involved someone pointing a gun at my head, so I panicked and ran through maze-like rooms to escape.

What do you think, Shannon? Is the new USLM strong enough to overcome my resistance given what I have? Does intense dreams when I skipped by mistake imply that it was working better with more breaks?

Thank you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 12-05-2020

(12-04-2020, 05:01 PM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(12-04-2020, 04:15 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-04-2020, 04:09 PM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(12-04-2020, 02:20 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-04-2020, 01:29 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: Hi @Shannon ill be quick. Im considering trying out masked for OF, rather the current US incase my phones preventing it from working effectively. You gave me specific instructions to listen at a volume of 13/15 through my phone, does that still apply if I use masked?

Masked is gentler than hybrid correct and thus I thought the better option to try, yes?

thank you

If you use Masked format, you should try masked at a volume that is comfortable to listen to.  Make sure the highs are not too high volume and the lows are still audible on the ocean surf track, and then that should work for the trickling stream, too.  

Masked is not as aggressive as Ultrasonic or hybrid.  If the issue you have with ultrasonic is too much too fast, then masked should get more results.  You can also try lowering the volume with the ultrasonic.  I would use masked before trying that though.

Thanks Shannon, so the reason for going to mask is because im feeling that my phone cant play US so may as well try masked. Only hesitation is whether it will interfer with my sleep or not so ill give it a shot tonight and see.

ok thank you ill give that a shot with ocean or trickling and see but do I need to calibrate ocean first to be able play trickling stream, thats my understanding yes?

thank you

Your phone can play ultrasonic just fine, Jake.

Yes, for fine tuning, use the ocean surf to set volume.  That should be right for trickling stream as well.

Thanks Shannon again. The reason I felt it didnt play US was cos I used the speaker test on the phone and got a swooshing sound on both my newer s10 samsung phone as my older s7 phone.

Also im now on cycle 5 and still nothing. I admitted I had to restart the cycles as I stopped due to the mess I went through and stress with the girl but I restarted soon as I could and reached cycle 5 with nothing noticed.

So was going to give masked a go but if you say my phone can play US just fine then ok ill stick with US.

thank you again

When you say swooshing sound, you mean the last several seconds were not silent?  I'd be very surprised if that phone couldn't reproduce ultrasonic audio correctly.

I didn't say you have to keep using US.  I just have a hard time believing your phone can't play it.  If you want to experiment with different formats, go ahead.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 12-05-2020

(12-05-2020, 02:12 AM)CatMan Wrote:
(12-02-2020, 09:21 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-02-2020, 12:27 AM)Kol Wrote: Hell yeah I want to be in. @Shannon does this mean this installment of OF 5.75.5G will be in the upcoming DMSI release? Also, am I correct to say that, as fear is root of it all, that OF/FRM is the key to FRM 5.0?

Allow me to clarify how I'm doing this.  

Fear Removal Module 4.9 is the module that is being used as the Key Script for Overcoming Fear.  That means the FRM is the goal of the program, and the rest of the skeleton script supports that goal.  But in other programs, the FRM is not the Key Script.  It is part of the Skeleton Script, which is what supports the Key Script.

So FRM is the key to OF, and the key to FRM 5.0 is something I haven't figured out yet.  Basically I'm not yet sure how to advance FRM 4.9 to 5.0, but I have identified some things that will enable the skeleton script to better support the FRM, thus allowing for better execution of FRM 4.9 without changing it's script.

It would be about like tuning a race car by improving all the components without upgrading the engine.  I'm not a car guy, but let's say we improve airflow to the engine, and we make the cooling better and we improve the efficiency of the engine by tweaking the timing, and we tweak the gear ratios, adjust the tire pressure, use better oil, add nitro and perhaps new spark plugs.  The same engine is now going to put out more power and perform better than before. 

That's sort of like what I am able to do right now by using FRM 4.9 in a newer, more advanced and better focused, tweaked and tuned skeleton script.

There's about 5-6+ orders at least now it seems for a new OF. Awesome! You could probably do one for E4 after too. Easy money for you, and since many of us are spinning our wheels now due to the pandemic issue...makes sense to dig deep with such programs to prepare for the post-pandemic world and future execution of other subs.

Is a new OF something you can do along side LTU Stage 5? Seems like it could be based off your past words.

Also, how are things with DMSI coming? Saw you mention a possibility with it recently, so I was curious.

Thanks, Shannon!

All of you need to keep in mind that if I build a new version of OF, and you buy it before the instructed time of use for the previous version is up, you are forfeiting your right to a refund of the older program by doing so.  I can build a new version of OF, but I can't do it alongside Stage 5 because Stage 5 is almost finished.  Should be coming out Monday or Tuesday.  I'll build OF v2 after that.

Haven't had much time to look at DMSI recently, with everything going wrong.  Last month was a nightmare comedy of errors, and it wasn't very funny.  I'll get to that.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 12-05-2020

(12-05-2020, 07:12 AM)ichigo Wrote: Hey Shannon, hope all is well!

I'm running Overcome ED 5G. I'm thinking about getting Sex Drive Maximizer to help out, I saw you say to somebody else that SDM would be a good choice for erection quality because of how it optimizes hormones for sexual arousal. I was thinking something like:

-10 hours Overcome ED
-2 loops SDM (the "in the moment" amount)

Per day. Would I be okay with a listening pattern like this, seeing as the goals kind of link into each other, or do you think it's better to just focus on one of them? And if so, my priority is trying to achieve rock hard erections, which one would you recommend I use?

Thanks!

If you're asking these questions, try switching to SDM for at least a month, and see how that affects you.  I enjiyed it a lot, wish I could keep running it.  But don't run them together.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 12-05-2020

(12-05-2020, 09:23 AM)Lowe Wrote: I have been using the new USLM since it came out, so about 6 weeks. No noticeable effect except vivid dreams.

Interestingly, the two nights when I skipped listening (by mistake, not from instruction) were two nights when dreams were most intense. One involved someone pointing a gun at my head, so I panicked and ran through maze-like rooms to escape.

What do you think, Shannon? Is the new USLM strong enough to overcome my resistance given what I have? Does intense dreams when I skipped by mistake imply that it was working better with more breaks?

Thank you.

I think what you should do is try to find the number of days on to day off that works best for you.  If you're getting results like that, then most likely you need more time off per cycle.