Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 04-24-2016

Yeah...some of this seems a bit off.

We have "nocturnal emissions" when semen isn't often released through masturbation or intercourse. The idea that the semen molds into this other thing inside you lol, is a bit odd. Not quite sure about all the new agey mumbo jumbo.

If you don't masturbate or have sex to release semen, your body will just give you wet dreams when it needs to release whatever it needs to. No harm done. No "energy" or "chi" or whatever else, to be concerned with.

No fap is still amazing. Wet dreams will make any issue with semen retention a self solving one.

It's okay guys, no crazy, awful thing will happen.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 11:01 AM)CatMan Wrote: Yeah...some of this seems a bit off.

We have "nocturnal emissions" when semen isn't often released through masturbation or intercourse. The idea that the semen molds into this other thing inside you lol, is a bit odd. Not quite sure about all the new agey mumbo jumbo.

If you don't masturbate or have sex to release semen, your body will just give you wet dreams when it needs to release whatever it needs to. No harm done. No "energy" or "chi" or whatever else, to be concerned with.

No fap is still amazing. Wet dreams will make any issue with semen retention a self solving one.

Lustful thoughts/actions and emission are different things. They often coincide, but they're not the same. I could probably go a year or two without a wet dream, but that'd be counter productive for me. And ancient isn't new age lol


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 04-24-2016

The bottom line was,

Wet dreams are done, semen is released, it's a naturally occurring process. It self regulates. When it needs to happen, it's done. If it doesn't, it doesn't.

No "energy" or whatever new agey/"ancient"/mumbo jumbo to be concerned with and fearmongering others about.

It's a self regulating process as is and nothing to be concerned about, that was the point.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 11:15 AM)CatMan Wrote: The bottom line was,

Wet dreams are done, semen is released, it's a naturally occurring process. It self regulates. When it needs to happen, it's done. If it doesn't, it doesn't.

No "energy" or whatever new agey/"ancient"/mumbo jumbo to be concerned with and fearmongering others about.

It's a self regulating process as is and nothing to be concerned about, that was the point.

There was no fear mongering involved in my post, only explanations and expounding on a topic they asked about. Just because something can be a self regulating process doesn't mean it IS one. Sexuality in general is pretty skewed in modern society, so all information that can lead to health is good.

It also cracks me up that you're poopoo'n new age mumbo jumbo on a magick forum lol


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 11:01 AM)CatMan Wrote: Yeah...some of this seems a bit off.

We have "nocturnal emissions" when semen isn't often released through masturbation or intercourse. The idea that the semen molds into this other thing inside you lol, is a bit odd. Not quite sure about all the new agey mumbo jumbo.

If you don't masturbate or have sex to release semen, your body will just give you wet dreams when it needs to release whatever it needs to. No harm done. No "energy" or "chi" or whatever else, to be concerned with.

No fap is still amazing. Wet dreams will make any issue with semen retention a self solving one.

It's okay guys, no crazy, awful thing will happen.

Welcome back Catman.

Have you had any nocturnal semen emission since you started no-fap? I've only had one in the several months of no-fap, and i actually woke up right as i started cumming, lol, so it wasn't completely a wet "dream".


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AbundanceCH - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 05:06 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: If I am using the iPhone I am playing the files from my Dropbox account with the Dropbox built-in player. So there is no need for conversion this way. You can also make the files offline available.

But, yeah, so much I like Apple products, so much I dislike their way to do certain things.
Thank you! I started using this method right away. I think the quality of the sound is better than with the aux cable which for some reason sometimes made the speaker make noise and I used to get small headaches. I been listening for more than 3 hours and no headaches.

This is really gonna improve things for me Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 04-24-2016

Quote:Why should everyone have to install something special to do basic stuff like copying files with Apple products? Why can't I just bluetooth a file to an iPhone without installing something else and setting up an account and then jumping through a few more hoops? Makes me dislike Apple. A lot. Otherwise I'd have switched to a Macbook Pro about 3 years ago.

I agree that's why I hate apple products now. But when my original ipod stopped working (back then there wasn't this issue with itunes) I got a new one and didn't know of this stupidity they forced on you.

It's mainly for people who already have an ipod and hate itunes.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Broski - 04-25-2016

(04-24-2016, 04:35 PM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:Why should everyone have to install something special to do basic stuff like copying files with Apple products? Why can't I just bluetooth a file to an iPhone without installing something else and setting up an account and then jumping through a few more hoops? Makes me dislike Apple. A lot. Otherwise I'd have switched to a Macbook Pro about 3 years ago.

I agree that's why I hate apple products now. But when my original ipod stopped working (back then there wasn't this issue with itunes) I got a new one and didn't know of this stupidity they forced on you.

It's mainly for people who already have an ipod and hate itunes.

Wait so is there a problem with using subs on an ipod? I have always used itunes and an ipod for my sub use.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 04-25-2016

(04-24-2016, 11:23 AM)Nox Wrote:
(04-24-2016, 11:15 AM)CatMan Wrote: The bottom line was,

Wet dreams are done, semen is released, it's a naturally occurring process. It self regulates. When it needs to happen, it's done. If it doesn't, it doesn't.

No "energy" or whatever new agey/"ancient"/mumbo jumbo to be concerned with and fearmongering others about.

It's a self regulating process as is and nothing to be concerned about, that was the point.

There was no fear mongering involved in my post, only explanations and expounding on a topic they asked about. Just because something can be a self regulating process doesn't mean it IS one. Sexuality in general is pretty skewed in modern society, so all information that can lead to health is good.

It also cracks me up that you're poopoo'n new age mumbo jumbo on a magick forum lol

I'm confused by CatMan talking about "New agey mumbo jumbo" and you referring to this as a "magick forum".

This is a subliminals forum.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - apollolux - 04-25-2016

(04-25-2016, 02:46 AM)Broski Wrote:
(04-24-2016, 04:35 PM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:Why should everyone have to install something special to do basic stuff like copying files with Apple products? Why can't I just bluetooth a file to an iPhone without installing something else and setting up an account and then jumping through a few more hoops? Makes me dislike Apple. A lot. Otherwise I'd have switched to a Macbook Pro about 3 years ago.

I agree that's why I hate apple products now. But when my original ipod stopped working (back then there wasn't this issue with itunes) I got a new one and didn't know of this stupidity they forced on you.

It's mainly for people who already have an ipod and hate itunes.

Wait so is there a problem with using subs on an ipod? I have always used itunes and an ipod for my sub use.

The problem isn't with the iPod itself, it's with the software used to get MP3s onto it, particularly if it thinks it's smart enough to do extra compression for you or in the case of Ben delete all your songs because it turns on "sync only to this computer" by default.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Broski - 04-25-2016

(04-25-2016, 07:47 AM)apollolux Wrote:
(04-25-2016, 02:46 AM)Broski Wrote:
(04-24-2016, 04:35 PM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:Why should everyone have to install something special to do basic stuff like copying files with Apple products? Why can't I just bluetooth a file to an iPhone without installing something else and setting up an account and then jumping through a few more hoops? Makes me dislike Apple. A lot. Otherwise I'd have switched to a Macbook Pro about 3 years ago.

I agree that's why I hate apple products now. But when my original ipod stopped working (back then there wasn't this issue with itunes) I got a new one and didn't know of this stupidity they forced on you.

It's mainly for people who already have an ipod and hate itunes.

Wait so is there a problem with using subs on an ipod? I have always used itunes and an ipod for my sub use.

The problem isn't with the iPod itself, it's with the software used to get MP3s onto it, particularly if it thinks it's smart enough to do extra compression for you or in the case of Ben delete all your songs because it turns on "sync only to this computer" by default.
So how do I know if its been doing this? I have always used itunes to put the subbs on my ipod


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 04-25-2016

Yeasterday i switched from IPhone to Sony Xperia Z3.
I redownloaded am6 directly to The new Phone.
Im not 100% sure but it feels that The new Phone is better at playing subs. About 30% better actually.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 04-25-2016

(04-25-2016, 10:15 AM)Kurohawk Wrote: Yeasterday i switched from IPhone to Sony Xperia Z3.
I redownloaded am6 directly to The new Phone.
Im not 100% sure but it feels that The new Phone is better at playing subs. About 30% better actually.

With Dual Front facing speakers it should lol.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - TheGreatAttractor - 04-25-2016

(04-23-2016, 03:07 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(04-23-2016, 08:09 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: Shannon, just a few questions if you don't mind.

1. It would be really appreciated not just by me but by everyone if you would make a repair hearing loss/improve hearing subliminal in 6g and hopefully you make that one free for your customers. I know you have an experimental one already out now but i'm sure it would be much more powerful in 6g. Listening to the ultrasonics or even just using headphones for long hours there is bound to be some effects to our hearing, and to have a subliminal that can counteract these effects would be a positive thing.

Maybe if you could find a way to make this a subliminal you can listen to along with other 6g subliminals. You mentioned how you were hoping to make subliminals so powerful we only had to listen to them once a day for an hour. If there was a way we could listen to our other 6g subliminals and still be able to listen to this one for an hour. Maybe figure out a way to make a health related subliminal so that we can listen to it on the same day as non health related subliminals.

Best case scenario like a hearing tune up 6g we could listen a few times a week to heal our hearing or listen to it when we have any ear pain etc. Although the hope would be for something that would repair hearing loss and make our hearing as good as ever.

Listening to ultrasonics for hours on end doesn't cause or speed up hearing loss or damage any faster than listening to any other form of audio. It's not magically louder than or more damaging than any other audio. It does have to be used in the same sort of reasonable manner as any other audio, though. Other than listning too loudly, it's just the same with or without subs or headphones for your ears.

6G isn't finished being developed yet, so I don't fully know how it interacts with 5G/5.5G/6G yet. I also don't know how long per day will be "enough" or "too much". That is largely based on how much energy it takes to run the program.

The vision/hearing aids, however, are on my list.

Quote:2. In the base 2.1 description pdf you mention that the original base script is included which we can find at the script page. I was wondering in what stage or stages is the original base script in base 2.1?

It's found in all of them.

Quote:3. Will you be making attract your perfect wife/husband/perfect oriental/japanese romantic lover any time soon in 5g?

That depends on how things pan out in the future. Right now I am trying to build Maximum Healing Speed, trying to build General Pain Relief Prototype 12 for itself and to add to MHS, trying to develop 6G, trying to create a sub to help Andrew, trying to create an active manifestation sub prototype, and trying to create a "Manifest Your Perfect Vehicle" sub based on that. I'm literally working till I drop every day lately. Last I left the office, I was thinking about just sleeping here because I wasn't sure I could drive home. It's like that.

Since every time I make plans or a list, something comes along and detours me, I am really not all that big on lists anymore.

Shannon - just wondering if it is possible to extend the scope of the new MHS to include restoring vision and hearing to optimal levels, and removing scars on and inside the body?

As it stands, these issues fall into a kind of grey area and the subconscious might not interpret them as things which involve healing. Successfully adding these functions to MHS (by specifically mentioning them in the script) would definitely "kill many birds with one sub"Wink.

Now, there might be some concern that adding extra functionality to the sub will detract from the healing speed or focus. For example, in a person with bad eyesight who is also injured - the healing of the injury might take more time. However this can be solved by adding a "prioritization module" which directs the subconscious to focus, and stay focused, on rapid healing where it is needed most (I believe the subconscious knows best).

I hope you consider all this.