Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 05-18-2020

(05-18-2020, 04:48 AM)Hanpan Wrote:
(05-17-2020, 05:20 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-17-2020, 03:44 PM)THolt Wrote:
(05-17-2020, 01:35 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-17-2020, 05:33 AM)RTBoss Wrote: It would be cool to have an FRM-adjunct sub that is designed to remove fear from executing any sub from any generation that you run alongside it.

That would be the Overcoming Fear 5.75G subliminal that will be released based on FRM 4.9.  :Smile But the OF 575G sub can't know what you are running, so it must work on ALL fear.

When are you expecting to work on OF 5.75G?

Shortly after FRM 4.9 is finished.  Basically, OF 5.75G will be FRM 4.9, the subliminal.

Sounds very interesting. Is the aim of the program to clear out your (irrational) fears forever, or is the program designed to make it easier for you to face your fears short-term without doing anything long-term?

FRM has always had the goal of permanent removal of whatever fears it was aimed at.  I'm aiming to prevent the fear, not make it easier to face.  

With OF based on 4.9, we shall see how effective that actually is with the current approach.  My current opinion is that 4.9 will be very close to finished.  But we can't know for sure until we see it in live real world use.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - ncbeareatingman - 05-18-2020

Shannon's quote "UMS2 and LTU6 are both going to be built in 6+1 stage format. No boredom possible. Smile"

Me" Wow , so 250 thousand dollars for UMS2 and da 1/2 a Million dollars for LTU in 6 stages ;plus 1, Sets !!???
how do ya make money is ya dont have it to make more,or purchases like these??? It is inspiring I admit that UMS2 and LTU6 will be in 7 stages. Wow whaddah surprise.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 05-19-2020

(05-18-2020, 08:52 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Shannon's quote "UMS2 and LTU6 are both going to be built in 6+1 stage format. No boredom possible. Smile"

Me" Wow , so 250 thousand dollars for UMS2 and da 1/2 a Million dollars for LTU   in 6 stages ;plus 1, Sets !!???
how do ya make money is ya dont have it to make more,or purchases like these???  It is inspiring I admit that UMS2 and LTU6 will be in 7 stages. Wow whaddah surprise.

These are likely to be built while $114.95 a stage is still necessary.  And they will be made available on a stage by stage basis.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Hanpan - 05-19-2020

Hey Shannon.

I just read your post about Tranquilizer B. I love this idea.

Usually I have a very hard time falling asleep if I've worked late or been to the gym late.

How does this work with SIA? Is it meant to be a replacement or supplement?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 05-19-2020

(05-19-2020, 10:13 AM)Hanpan Wrote: Hey Shannon.

I just read your post about Tranquilizer B. I love this idea.

Usually I have a very hard time falling asleep if I've worked late or been to the gym late.

How does this work with SIA? Is it meant to be a replacement or supplement?

SIA 5G is a similar concept, but using very old technology.  This is designed to be roughly similar in goal, but use the latest and greatest tech and be more effective when you're really upset/wired/etc.  You would use this instead of SIA 5G in situations when and where SIA 5G isn't enough to put you to sleep.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Hanpan - 05-19-2020

Sounds good. Would it be possible to use Tranq B every night if it is more efficient?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 05-19-2020

(05-19-2020, 10:39 AM)Hanpan Wrote: Sounds good. Would it be possible to use Tranq B every night if it is more efficient?

It's going to depend on a few factors I haven't yet determined.  Theoretically, yes, as long as you don't use it more than 1 loop.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Hanpan - 05-19-2020

Excellent!

I hope you have the time to give me feedback on an additional question. I’ll try not to be too long-winded.

Around a week ago I asked you about a new version of ARA, since I’m starting on a new job on 1/6. I don’t have any anxiety condition and I don’t think that I experience above-average nervousness, but I do get stressed from time to time, which I believe most lawyers do, especially when I’m involved in larger and more hectic transactions. Furthermore, I really enjoyed the chill way that ARA made me feel

I’ve totally forgot that Tranq A existed, so based on my description above, do you believe that Trans A would help me in a way that would allow me to keep on using LTU (or the new overcoming fear sub) instead of switching to ARA? Furthermore, do you expect to update Tranq A simultaneously with publishing Tranq B, or is that a separate project?

Thanks a lot in advance – your answers are always appreciated.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - zero_force - 05-19-2020

@Shannon I hope I don't waste your time.

I did a meditation that you meet a twin self with different characteristics than you. I chose the one that in his reality, he found a way to make DMSI execute and had certain success. I asked this self of what he did (differently). The first time the question was answered with the followings: a) run it during the day and not night, b) set the intention of agreeing with what the program "says" and c) put on some cologne.

When I got out of the relaxed state and written down the answers my immediate thought was how do I agree with what the program says? I don't get that. Few hours later got into the relaxed state once again, meet that self and asked him to be more specific, give me more details on that "agreeing". Didn't get much. The first reply was to have a yes attitude, whatever that means. Then to agree with it and accept it.

I don't know what to make out of this but I am guessing that this, points out my resistance in terms of accepting rather than rejecting what DMSI tells my mind.

If you have any (intuitive) thoughts from what I wrote above please let me know. What I will be doing is lowering the volume 1 or 2 clicks so that I make it more gentle, so if resistance is the case I will probably get better results.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 05-19-2020

(05-19-2020, 11:02 AM)Hanpan Wrote: Excellent!

I hope you have the time to give me feedback on an additional question. I’ll try not to be too long-winded.

Around a week ago I asked you about a new version of ARA, since I’m starting on a new job on 1/6. I don’t have any anxiety condition and I don’t think that I experience above-average nervousness, but I do get stressed from time to time, which I believe most lawyers do, especially when I’m involved in larger and more hectic transactions.  Furthermore, I really enjoyed the chill way that ARA made me feel

I’ve totally forgot that Tranq A existed, so based on my description above, do you believe that Trans A would help me in a way that would allow me to keep on using LTU (or the new overcoming fear sub) instead of switching to ARA? Furthermore, do you expect to update Tranq A simultaneously with publishing Tranq B, or is that a separate project?  

Thanks a lot in advance – your answers are always appreciated.

Tranquilizer A is not something I have used a lot, because even though I created it specifically to allow me to keep working if I am upset, it consistently un-did the motivational effects of UMS.  So I really don't have a lot of experience with it.

If you're trying to calm down from being upset, angry, frustrated, Tranquilizer A is a good choice.  If you're trying to stay motivated to work, ARA is a good choice.  If you have Tranqulizer A, you can give it a shot for your personal needs and verify, but generally it is designed to create a Zen state of inner peace that results in stillness, not necessarily action.

Tranquilizer B will take advantage of this to induce sleep.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 05-19-2020

(05-19-2020, 01:22 PM)zero_force Wrote: @Shannon I hope I don't waste your time.

I did a meditation that you meet a twin self with different characteristics than you. I chose the one that in his reality, he found a way to make DMSI execute and had certain success. I asked this self of what he did (differently). The first time the question was answered with the followings: a) run it during the day and not night, b) set the intention of agreeing with what the program "says" and c) put on some cologne.

When I got out of the relaxed state and written down the answers my immediate thought was how do I agree with what the program says? I don't get that. Few hours later got into the relaxed state once again, meet that self and asked him to be more specific, give me more details on that "agreeing". Didn't get much. The first reply was to have a yes attitude, whatever that means. Then to agree with it and accept it.

I don't know what to make out of this but I am guessing that this, points out my resistance in terms of accepting rather than rejecting what DMSI tells my mind.

If you have any (intuitive) thoughts from what I wrote above please let me know. What I will be doing is lowering the volume 1 or 2 clicks so that I make it more gentle, so if resistance is the case I will probably get better results.

If your guidance was to accept rather than reject, then the goal is to understand how you are rejecting.  Is this happening at a conscious and subconscious level?  Just a subconscious level?  

A "Yes" attitude is an attitude that seeks success through acceptance, agreement and movement forward.  Yes, we are going to achieve these goals.  Yes, we are going to do whatever it takes.  Yes, we are going to succeed.  Yes, we are going to do what is necessary even if it scares us.

I suggest you talk to this twin again and ask for it to be explained in more detail so your conscious self can better understand it.

If your twin gave you this advice and not the advice to lower the volume, then perhaps lowering the volume isn't the solution for you.  But seek more specifics and details for yourself on what the core of the resistance is, what is causing it and how to change that resistance to execution.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Zubrowka - 05-19-2020

Hi Shannon,
I've suggested UMS for LTU6 before but that didn't seem as a good alternative as one user said that LTU is more about inner work and UMS is more about manifesting I.e. Outer work.

It got me thinking, and during my LTU5 run I've had an increased drive to learn new things - evything from improving on my hobbies to learning stuff that's useful for my work to learning stuff about life such a philosophy. So couldn't MLS be a good addition to LTU6? I for one could at least totally see it as supporting to the other modules.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 05-19-2020

(05-19-2020, 02:53 PM)Zubrowka Wrote: Hi Shannon,
I've suggested UMS for LTU6 before but that didn't seem as a good alternative as one user said that LTU is more about inner work and UMS is more about manifesting I.e. Outer work.

It got me thinking, and during my LTU5 run I've had an increased drive to learn new things - evything from improving on my hobbies to learning stuff that's useful for my work to learning stuff about life such a philosophy. So couldn't MLS be a good addition to LTU6? I for one could at least totally see it as supporting to the other modules.

There will very likely never be any more title additions to LTU.  It already has 12 titles in it.  That is the limit of what I can make work at a time.  Believe me, I would love to add in a number of others, but we are dealing with limits outside my control.  I'm not thinking that is likely to change.  So I can optimize it and upgrade the skeleton script, but I cannot add more things to it and make it work.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - AriGold - 05-19-2020

(05-19-2020, 07:02 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-18-2020, 08:52 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Shannon's quote "UMS2 and LTU6 are both going to be built in 6+1 stage format. No boredom possible. Smile"

Me" Wow , so 250 thousand dollars for UMS2 and da 1/2 a Million dollars for LTU   in 6 stages ;plus 1, Sets !!???
how do ya make money is ya dont have it to make more,or purchases like these???  It is inspiring I admit that UMS2 and LTU6 will be in 7 stages. Wow whaddah surprise.

These are likely to be built while $114.95 a stage is still necessary.  And they will be made available on a stage by stage basis.

Hey Shannon, how do you mean they will be made available on stage by stage basis? Is it like AM, SM or WM like "it is 6 stages long and you have to use the program like this" or is it different this time? I have in mind that we could use the "first level" of LTU 1-3 months and then the next level of LTU for 1-3 months. 
With level I mean like there is a basic level (close to the current version, I call it here LTU-B), then another level that goes more into the direction of Learning(LTU-L), then another level that goes more in the direction of money(LTU-M), etc. But for each change you have to listen to the basic level before again.

To give an example:
I don't have much money and listen to the LTU-B for 3 months. Then I decide I want to get more learning abilities, so after 3 months on LTU-B I saved enough money to go for LTU-L. After 3 months I have to go back to the LTU-B, otherwise the subconscious could get bored. Then I do another round of LTU-L for 3 months. After that I want to try out the money-one, so I have to use LTU-B first for 3 months and then can go to LTU-M.
There is a lot of options with just a little change or addition to LTU. A more creative level, a healing/calming/stressless level, a level for intense gratitude and happiness, a level for more sport and fitness.

I know there is already different programs but I would guess that a lot of LTU5 customers would like to still continue with the benefits of it and have a slight addition. Of course you can't sell LTU-L or LTU-M without first selling the LTU-B to that customer. Maybe you can let it run for the first 6 months just for longer customers that are used to the usage pattern.

Does this sound interesting to all of you IML-customers?