04-08-2015, 10:55 PM
In the description of his book he said he proved something if I remember correctly but I didn't read it yet so I don't know at all. "Astrology doesn't explain it's workings" Some astrologer learn both astronomy and astrology and search for answer too. I called it a science from my point of view. I know a lot of people will disagree and I don't care about it. In the end it's just a word and I'm not here to talk about which term is the better one. For me astrology is a practical thing, it gives answer to things we don't understand. Some astrologer doesn't do the distinction between astrology and astronomy. To them they are both the same thing that got separated for some debatable reason. I agree with that point of view.
I'm not an expert in science but I learnt that a lot of well "known" science seems like they don't even fit in the science term. It seems like everyone got his own POV. I don't trust the current institution in power who seems to hide what they really know. So in the end we don't know at all unless we have really experimented the thing and learnt it for a really long time. Who here have learnt both astrology with real astrologer, astronomy and science. On top of that add someone who is open minded unlike a lot of scientific guy who are completely unreasonable, illogical and acting on emotion, corruption, money, etc.
I'm not an expert in science but I learnt that a lot of well "known" science seems like they don't even fit in the science term. It seems like everyone got his own POV. I don't trust the current institution in power who seems to hide what they really know. So in the end we don't know at all unless we have really experimented the thing and learnt it for a really long time. Who here have learnt both astrology with real astrologer, astronomy and science. On top of that add someone who is open minded unlike a lot of scientific guy who are completely unreasonable, illogical and acting on emotion, corruption, money, etc.