(11-19-2016, 05:02 PM)Shannon Wrote: You guys are so focused on one goal and one way to it, it's no wonder you have these issues.
DMSI goal is to get others to approach and initiate. In the end, that is the goal and it's not changing unless I have no choice. I have that choice, because I know I can achieve that goal. Maybe not in 3.0, but I can and I will.
Even if NSFM can be added in a way that would enhance instead of detract, which may be possible, it is still training wheels for guys who are stuck in the paradigm that got them where they are now. It almost certainly won't be included in the final no matter what for that reason.
So if I can find a way to add it and enhance DMSI, I will try. If I run out of time, it may get passed over. There are several other much more important things to add still.
Shannon and Co. --
Look at it like this. We already know that the aura can generate significant amounts of attraction, barring a few people here who are outright refusing to execute the script.
BTW: For those of you who will object to that, Shannon has stated that the "morphine drip" effect is actually a tag that allows him to see if you're executing the script or not. So... that being said -- no euphoria, you're not executing the script.
ANYWAY -- we know it can at least generate attraction. We have tons and tons of data on that. Adding NSFM will allow us to gather data on how DMSI performs after the initial attraction phase, when the courtship ritual is now in what I call the "negotiation phase," because that's essentially what it is -- you and your target are essentially negotiating what you're going to offer in exchange for sex, whether it's a good fuck, access to your money, a potential baby, etc.
Personally, I think the data in that stage is invaluable, and it may be worth adding NSFM and OAA to this stage of the script just so you can get that data.
For example:
I'm beginning to question whether the celebrity vibe is doing us more harm than help. Last night, I ran some loops of v2.5 before my date. I knew I was actually executing the code because I experienced what felt like a full body orgasm for the entire three loops.
Long story short, she began to seduce me after about 45 minutes of the pre-chatter. We made out, felt each other up, etc. We were lost in this little bubble of just sexuality. Definitely had some sniper play in there.
Anyway, we ended back at her house. We're doing EVERYTHING but f*cking at this point. Hand jobs, blowies, I'm going down on her, she's going down on me -- but she's putting up some SIGNIFICANT ASD. It mean, that's some mind blowing cognitive dissonance to be drenching wet, screaming in ecstasy, willing to do everything... except f*ck. She kept telling me that she wanted to "wait until Christmas," where she could dress up in lingerie as a present and I could unwrap her.
Just to add to the story, this chick is severely sexually frustrated. She just came out of a long-term relationship where the guy was refusing to fuck her. She said that over the course of eight months, they had sex twice. And both times, she had to push and initiate. When he'd finally relent, he said he felt like he was being forced. She told me that he would hide in the bathroom when he changed clothes and wouldn't let her look at him. To me, this is clearly signs of sexual abuse as a child and I kinda wanted to look the dude up and send him the link to E2.
Anyway, I point that out to show the level of ASD I was getting. I finally got her to give in by using a very strategic approach of staggered escalation. It's where you push the boundary and when she stops you, you hop back one step. Not too far. If you're kissing her neck on one side and rubbing your fingers on the other side of her neck and when you go for a boob grab (or to unbutton her shirt) and she slaps it away, you go back to rubbing her neck for a minute... then proceed with the boob grab.
After AN HOUR of this, she finally gave in and I railed her brains out for a good hour (was totally pumped full of Indian Viagra, sorry not sorry) until the chick could barely walk.
And guess what she says after that? "We're not doing this again until Christmas."
It's clear to me that she's trying to lock me down as a long-term mate, not a casual fuck buddy, which seems to me isn't necessarily the goal of DMSI. Seems like a side effect. Illumi just reported a similar situation, where the woman allowed him to slap her ass, but wouldn't let him escalate. I don't see that situation as a rejection. I see that situation as, "I want to lock you down, not just be your playmate."
The fact is, we need more information and data, but we're having problems with men being able to approach women. While the long term goal of DMSI is to make the gender you're attracted to approach you with little effort, I believe we're limiting the data we can get if we only focus on the pre-attraction, attraction stage.
... plus, I really wanna get OAA and NSFM programming in 5.5g. Lawd. It'll definitely up the amount of information I could report.
EDIT: What I'm trying to say is that I'm seeing a few inconsistent results. The women are clearly seeing us as sexual enough to let us touch them and the such, but instead of giving in and fucking us, they're pulling the, "I wanna lock you down game." I've been considered what the manosphere calls a "beta bucks" before -- the emasculated male where the woman only wants you for your resources. And... they don't let you touch them and the such. They control all the strings for sex. This isn't that. This is, let's fuck... but I want you to date me and be baby daddy!