07-06-2016, 04:32 AM
(07-06-2016, 03:49 AM)jacksonchandra Wrote: I just read Shannon's Journal about hours ago and He said that some people just disappointed with DMSI 2.1. Why?
Several reasons in my [not so] humble opinion:
1. Most of the users are young males who want a microwave solution. I.E. we're less than 5 days into testing a product that can take as much as 30 days to get measurable results.
2. It's an unknown, so even if it works faster, they may not know what to look for, or how to gauge its effectiveness.
3. I think folks are so anxious for results, that there may be a tendency to report the ordinary as extraordinary.
4. Many of the reports I have seen (from all the "attraction" type subs, not just this one) seem to report "perhaps," "maybe," "kinda sorta," and other such things as 'data.'
People are social creatures. Even if I were an ugly troll, when I check out at the grocery store, the attractive young female clerk is likely to smile and say "how are you doing today?" (at least here in the South). So if I get the warm tingly's in my belly, that just means I found her attractive, not that she was interested.
If she surreptitiously slips me her cell phone number and says "call me," then I call and she tells me that SHE got the warm tinglies when I spoke to her... NOW we're talking relevant results.
---
It may be worth developing a standardized report form that folks can use for testing.
Male, 48, ENTP, married, III%
Current: EPRHA 2.0
Completed: ASC (30 Jun 16)
Current: EPRHA 2.0
Completed: ASC (30 Jun 16)