Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[Shannon]

Hi Shannon,

Just a quick question. Alpha male 5.G does it have hashtags for us to check? I noticed on my account that BASE has a txt file with the Hash but Alpha Male does not.

No, no such tags were calculated for my programs at that time.

[Believe]

I have been doing USLM for 2 weeks now. A couple of good things have happened.
My question is, did anyone else had problems sleeping while listening to the sub.

I had no problem sleeping while listening to Alpha Male or DMSI.
But with USLM I am finding that it takes me 1-2h to be able to sleep..

USLM uses version 3.2 of the Fear Removal Module - FRM
The sleep issue was corrected with version 4.2 of FRM

https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Men-s...#pid212427

FRM v4.2 is here. It now improves on v4.1 by preventing the process from interrupting your sleep or negatively affecting the quality of it.

Wonder what else I can do to improve this bad boy.

@Shannon I have purchased the USLM on 15th of December, does that mean you have already updated the FRM on the version i have or not yet?
If not yet, do you have in mind when you will be updating the file?
(Happy new year in advance)

[Shannon]

Shannon, I see that you say 3.4 will be final and anything beyond that will have to be paid in addition for. Just a few questions when you get a chance to answer.

1. Will DMSI 4.0 be more effective than 3.4 if you use 3.4 and it’s not working? Could 4.0 work when 3.4 doesn’t? I’m guessing that’s not the case but want to be sure.

I don't know if there will be a v4, but if there is, why wouldn't it be? This question makes no sense, since every release of DMSI has been a significant improvement in effectiveness, and v4 > v3.x. If 3.4 doesn't work, yes, 4.0 may very well. But I haven't decided what to do that far out yet. Right now I might wait to build 3.4 in 6G or I might build it in 5.5G and then 4.0 in 6G. I don't know where you get some of your ideas, they don't make sense to me.

2. If that is the case, when someone uses 3.4 and it doesn’t work, then what are their options? Both in achieving the goal the program is designed to achieve and with potential refunds or being able to upgrade to 4.0

You are assuming it won't work, and I haven't even started building it yet. But realistically, is it reasonable for me to build 8 versions of the program that you pay for once and then give you a refund if you choose not to execute it?

When the time comes and we see what 3.4 does, I will look at what is what and decide what to do for those who are still not executing. For the time being, it does not seem reasonable to me that you would get to pay once, get 7 versions for free, and then get a refund.

3. This isn’t as important of a question, but comparing how effective you want 6G to be, to the tech in DMSI 3.3, how much of a difference is there currently?

Thanks in advance

6G is going to be a significant step up from where DMSI 3.3 is, we have a number of things to decipher, build and add before we get there.

[Oversoul]

Just tried DMSI 3.3 (IK you are meant to wait 35 days etc but F**k it, I had to try it).


Going out tonight, let's see what happens.

[maxx55]

Thanks for the fast response Shannon. I’ll try to clarify what I meant since it wasn’t that clear.

No, I was not saying it’s fair to pay for one version of a program and get every version after. I mistakenly assumed that 4.0 wouldn’t “hit more resistant users” than 3.4 because 3.4 is supposed to a definitive final version. I thought anything afterward would just be like extra toppings on top of an already well done pizza, not a whole new altogether better pizza.

I don’t mean to cast doubt on your work, I just haven’t yet experienced anything to know it works. I’ve invested a lot of time with the program, I do intend to get the results intended as a return of my investment. Clearly, I have not chosen to refuse executing the program.

I hope with enough time that 3.3 pleasantly surprises everyone here. I do think aiming for 3.4 to be 6G is a solid option at the moment just in case.

[Darwinn]

Wishing all you guys a very happy new year - here’s to a wild 2019 and to our potentials being fulfilled.

And as always, thanks Shannon - it’s a pleasure being a part of this development journey.

[THolt]

@Shannon any New Years plan this year? I imagine you are going to take a break of some sort from building LTU. In the new year I am looking forward to using UMS as I have to fears around money and scarcity that need clearing.

I don't really have any plans for New Year's right now. Since I am sick as of yesterday evening, though, I am already taking a break from building LTU.

I'm looking at turning USLM4 into UMS, and other things as well. I note that USLM3 causes my girlfriend to be more interested in success and accomplishment than sex, so I am going to try to make USLM4 not reduce normal interest in sex, and I was thinking I might try to create something for ultra success in weight loss and maybe another idea or two. But don't worry, that will come after UMS.

@Shannon have you considered making a US sub for socializing and making friends?

There are a lot of possibilities for what I can aim USLM4+ at. Haven't considered them all yet, but that's not a bad idea at all.

@Shannon

Thanks for considering it. I think it would be a neat program.

[Shannon]

Thanks for the fast response Shannon. I’ll try to clarify what I meant since it wasn’t that clear.

No, I was not saying it’s fair to pay for one version of a program and get every version after. I mistakenly assumed that 4.0 wouldn’t “hit more resistant users” than 3.4 because 3.4 is supposed to a definitive final version. I thought anything afterward would just be like extra toppings on top of an already well done pizza, not a whole new altogether better pizza.

If that were the case, wouldn't it make sense to call it 3.5? 4.0, if it is made, will be a major step up from 3.4.

I don’t mean to cast doubt on your work, I just haven’t yet experienced anything to know it works. I’ve invested a lot of time with the program, I do intend to get the results intended as a return of my investment. Clearly, I have not chosen to refuse executing the program.

The problem is that at the conscious level you have chosen to execute, and at the subconscious level you have chosen to refuse to execute. The big issue is how do we get the subconscious to cooperate? I have a number of things left to do before we get to 6G, yet. I have a LOT of stuff to mine out of Beast, and I haven't yet gotten Beast to design spec. Even just today, sick as I am and unable to really do anything, I had a realization that should - by itself - make 3.4 work for almost everyone. But there are going to be a lot of changes to 3.3 before it becomes 3.4. And if we do 6G as a base, there will be a lot of changes indeed.

The key you need to understand, though, is this: whatever results you are getting from DMSI, that is what your subconscious desires are. If that is nothing, then you are, in spite of my best efforts so far, refusing to execute at a subconscious level. And that's the issue - the conscious and subconscious can disagree 100%, and when they do, the subconscious always wins. Or at least, it always has in the past. We are working to change that. Some of you still represent an enigma apparently. 6G is a ways away because there is so much to do. But first I have to get it finished.

I hope with enough time that 3.3 pleasantly surprises everyone here. I do think aiming for 3.4 to be 6G is a solid option at the moment just in case.

I think even where we are with the latest 5.5G tech, 6G is still going to be an entirely different level. There is an unbelievable amount that I have to mine from Beast yet, and like I said, we haven't even finished developing it.

[maxx55]

Well thanks for clarifying what you meant. It felt pretty discouraging to have been using a program for years and be told “You’re choosing to not let it work”.

I do hope that you end up doing everything you could possibly do to have 3.4 be the most reality bending, resistance busting program in your selection. No rush at all.

I hope you get better soon Shannon so you enjoy the start of 2019.

Hope everyone here has a happy new year. A year of success!

[Shannon]

Well thanks for clarifying what you meant. It felt pretty discouraging to have been using a program for years and be told “You’re choosing to not let it work”.

I do hope that you end up doing everything you could possibly do to have 3.4 be the most reality bending, resistance busting program in your selection. No rush at all.

I hope you get better soon Shannon so you enjoy the start of 2019.

Hope everyone here has a happy new year. A year of success!

It's pretty discouraging to have been doing this for 26 years now and still not be able to get guys like you to stop stonewalling.

At least we aren't out of things to do to fix it yet.

[whome]

It's pretty discouraging to have been doing this for 26 years now and still not be able to get guys like you to stop stonewalling.

(hugs) I know I can be a tough nut, so I appreciate your efforts to crack me.

To success in 2019!

[Hatman]

It's pretty discouraging to have been doing this for 26 years now and still not be able to get guys like you to stop stonewalling.

(hugs) I know I can be a tough nut, so I appreciate your efforts to crack me.

To success in 2019!

[Shawn]

Happy New Year to everyone!

[Chris P. Bacon]

Shannon, on USLM3 I have had 2 days where I have woken up and had no desire to eat anything all day but I have eaten because I know I need to. This is not normal for me and hasn't happened on any other sub. Could there be a USLM3 related reason for this? To me, it sounds like a stretch but I have no other idea as to why this has happened. Today is a bit of a down day and I think USLM3 is working on some fears, last time I don' remember if it was the same situation.