(09-28-2018, 12:30 PM)CatMan Wrote: I was mentioned, so I guess I need to post now.
Right. So basically, you're saying that the girls I wanted, actually wanted me all along somehow, and my "fear blinded me to that". Well that's weird, because their actions and words said the exact opposite.
Totally not what I was saying. I said you are guilty of revisionist history. You get a result, and then a day or so later, say nothing happened.
Quote:That's why I got rejected or treated like trash by them. Even some saying point blank they weren't attracted to me were also apparently attracted. Because in another thread you said people generally respond to attraction with attraction. Of course, if that was actual reality...we wouldn't even NEED DMSI obviously.
If it wasn't true, they wouldn't teach that as a basic method of getting dates. People generally respond to attraction with attraction, but that is not always going to be the case. You have a taste for women you consider exceptionally beautiful, and those women are going to be very attractive to the majority of men. They will be getting a lot of attraction signals from a lot of men. The more such signals they get, and the more interest they get, the more selective they can - and must - be. They learn to select the men who display the best signs of having high value.
You are apparently doing something that is turning them off, pushing them away, and/or preventing them from being interested. And since you are doing this even through several versions of DMSI, and practicing revisionist history, we have to conclude that whatever it is you are doing is most likely at least subconscious if not conscious also, and quite intentional.
So for you, the most likely scenario is that consciously you are doing what you believe will generate attraction, but subconsciously you are doing the reverse. And as that must be intentional, and in spite of DMSI, we can conclude that it is based on fear of success in that direction, which would itself be based on beliefs that are resulting in the reality you are experiencing, which you obviously prefer to the alternative.
Signalling attraction has to be done congruently (which it seems likely that you are not doing) and it has to be done with the understanding that not everyone will be attracted in return.
Quote:And Jessica Alba would be attracted to most of the men in the world, lol.
Your style of "logic" here is strongly suggestive of why you are having these issues.
Quote:Or also that I'm "denying" they wanted me for some random reason, I guess lying about it all.
According to your own reports, there were results that you got that indicated interest from at least some of them. Then, every time, a day or two or three later, you were back to either silence on things that should have been followed up on ([reference removed] woman, for example) or simply denying what you yourself reported.
I don't know if you're lying, but you are certainly in denial.
Quote:Or that I had sex or whatever with them all, but "blinded" myself to all of it and don't recall any of it.
I don't know if you had sex with any of them.
Quote:You've spoke often of me allegedly "denying" all these amazing results DMSI is giving me that I can't recall at all.
Let's clear something up. I never said your results were "amazing". But you did report results. And like clockwork, every time you did, they somehow ceased to exist a few days later. So what I see is someone who is so afraid of success that his subconscious (or maybe this is conscious?) is literally in denial of reality. That would be why you can't recall the results you reported. You deny they were results, claim they meant nothing, say they weren't "really" results, and then try to put words in my mouth to change what I said to fit your revisionist history.
In other words, you are lying to yourself to keep yourself where you are at any and all costs.
You're even shutting down your own interest in women to hide from DMSI so it can't fire up the aura and succeed.
Quote:I can recall of no amazing results I've had on this. But then again, I'm probably just blinded to it so don't take my word for it.
So what ever did happen with that woman who was wanting so badly to [reference removed] and such?
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!