Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[NoLimit]

You gotta 'risk creepy'. Girls like having sex with 'badboys' or 'f**kboys' with not 'cool respectable guys'. Those are the ones they will settle down with after having all their fun.

Basically you gotta be abit of a ***** to them in a funny/cocky way and tease them a little bit while being sexually confident.

Without an element of danger, seduction isn't seduction.

You can risk creepy and be a badboy when you have look, I'm living proof of that. But if you are old and balding she will just call the cops dude

Tell that to Tyler from RSD...

Tyler isn't that bad looking and he is running beard game, there are girls attracted to this.

Also he needs to sell his product... just saying.

[Oversoul]

Looks and status definitely come into play and definitely help, there's no denying that.

But looks and status main function is eliciting a certain feeling in a woman which can be replicated with programmes like DMSI.

And really, looks (though IDK about status which though, is easier to fabricate using social proof etc) are mostly subjective on upbringing/environment than anything else. Create a strong enough emotional impression on a woman and anchor the feeling she gets from a 'hot guy' onto you, it should do the trick. I guess this is why PUA people who are good at what they do say that 'looks dont matter'.

[Zeroxmachina]

I always make a girl feel happy.

I am and have been told that im one of the funniest confident men some know (from uni) and i know this to be true.

I am very quick witted and able to make most situations funny and I dont do it to impress anyone its just something I do (perhaps it began for the need for validation or attention or approval who knows).

Now when i see a girl I like I try and play it cool and calm and make her laugh.

Guess what, im making her FEEL really good, really happy. So anyone saying its about how you make a girl feel well guess what im making them feel great....

BUT these girls have already made an impression about me based on my looks. Based on my grooming, my clothes/dress sense/style, my walk, my posture. They have already in a split second figured out if im their type or not.

ALL of these women will love harrison ford or the rock - no matter how dead their personalities are (and both bore the **** outta me lol) but because they are good looking guys they fall for them and this goes for any good looking guy.

If i was good looking and then had good dress, style, and my wit etc boom i would be unstoppable im sure.

ITS ALL ABOUT LOOKS and thats as clear as day.

Office romances, casual flings and all these sex based relationships happen due to looks also known as lust.

How do you show your sexual intent to these girls that find you funny and confident?

sorry i never saw this till now.

I will ask them to go for a meal and they will tell me either that were just friends or that im such a cool respectable nice guy etc.

If I try anything else then I could scare them or come across too creep sleazy I think.

I always get the im only a friend response anyway even though before that theyre laughing away etc.

Its 100% to do with looks.

Nah, in the real world there are dudes that just have 'it'. Whatever it is to women, which maybe not be anything more that a natural version of what DMSI is trying to achieve. I know a few guys like this; they aren't tall, handsome, rich, or even especially that funny, but they just have a way with the chicks. Literally one of them looks like a beaver, short arms, chubby, short, and the teeth, however he gets the chicks. You keep thinking it's about looks, it's not. That however does serve as a limiting belief that's a comfortable (and familiar) place to rest when things don't go the way ya want. And furthermore, don't ask women what it is they want, or like, they don't actually know, it's more important to find out what their actions are, not the ideas they have in their heads. With the right approach, 99% of women can and will 'change their minds'. Of course when you're already someone's type, things go smoother and require less effort, but it's not the end of the world if you aren't. As I've said, females are 90% mental, appeal to that, and the eyes will see what you want them to. Dating sites are trash in terms of realistic selection processes, people are generally there to get laid, or form long term relationships, and because it's the internet, they feel they can be more superficial. It's possible to approach a woman in real life with way better results that might give you the cold shoulder on an app.

Your living in cuckoo land. Looks do matter the initial physical chemistry does matter. I have never seen super hot girls with fat ugly guys unless they are good diggers or the guys are celebs.

Nah I live in a land where I get laid and don't lean on excuses because I actually understand women, your results may vary though. I dunno, it may be because I actually have 'game' or whatever it's called. What do I know though I'm just a person that got hit by a semi truck,maybe that's hot to women *shrugs*, what I'm noticing however is how dull the people who complain about looks seem to be, one thing women do tell me is that most of guys they meet can't really hold a conversation. For the thousandth time I will say this: women are MENTAL creatures. They operate from the mind and emotional state,period. Someone said women liked the Beatles cause of looks, no women liked the Beatles because they were the Beatles, if they were just 4 guys walking down the street no one would think twice about them. Of course a boring guy needs to rely on looks, he has nothing else. Nor did I say that they don't matter at all, I said in actuality they are secondary to what sort of feelings and thoughts you can create. If you don't know how to talk to women, hell yeah you'll have to rely on being 'hot' or whatever, but don't sit here and tell me it's "100% about looks" when I know it isn't. Also maybe you folks should actually do some research on "belief systems" and "limiting beliefs", You're already on a sub forum but the type of comments I see on a regular basis indicate a general lack of knowledge of the subconscious and why and how it directly creates the reality we experience. Sheesh...

[CatMan]

Hi Shannon!

So glad you had a great trip man. Happy to have you back and to hear you're working on V3.3 today . Very good news!

EDIT: Oops, I must have accidentally clicked on a chatterbox thread and posted this there by mistake. I meant to post this in Shannon's thread and can't delete this post. My bad.

[KingDavid93]

Hi Shannon,

What other programs incorporate and/or will incorporate Reality Bending technology?

Also are you planning to further upgrade the RB technology or is V 5.0 the end of the line?

[Shannon]

Okay, so I have just finished catching up on this thread.

In order to be maximally productive today, I will not attempt to answer all possible posts that I have read. Instead, if you want your question answered, please re-post it, and I will answer it as time allows. I will be working on 3.3 now.

As for the looks vs game argument (which is what it boils down to), you guys are trying to oversimplify things a LOT, and that's why some of you swear by X and some of you swear by -(X).

If you were taking into account all variables you would be able to see when each point of view has value and why.

I have been working on this problem for a LONG time, and I can tell you, there are literally hundreds of things women/females consider when choosing what to respond to you with. I would say that after all that I have seen and done, ZeroX comes closes to what I have found to be true.

But women, like men, consider ALL of these things. And each one has a different amount of weight for each different female. So some women are "all about looks" and some are focused on energy, money, fame, status, fun and so forth. But ANY woman can be persuaded to change her mind in ANY direction, given the right actions and reactions from the male. The thing is, 99.999999999% of the time, the guy does not know all of what he needs to know to understand what he needs to do to achieve that end result. That is what DMSI is trying to do for you.

It is all about her perception of you and what her programming dictates that she does n response to that perception. And there are ways to communicate value/interesting-ness, without ever talking to her or even notice her.

Women, and men, are not black and white. They're not simple. They are all different. You can't say "all women/men/gays/straights/bis/whatever" are any one thing, because they're all unique individuals. And you have to take that into account.

Off to work, now.

And thank you all for the birthday wishes. I had a blast on my birthday.

[Shannon]

Hi Shannon,

What other programs incorporate and/or will incorporate Reality Bending technology?

Also are you planning to further upgrade the RB technology or is V 5.0 the end of the line?

RB is in the skeleton script. Sop everything I have made since it was introduced. I don't remember everything off the top of my head.

RB will be improved every time I find a way to do so.

[freerad98]

Quick tip for everyone running iPhone/iPad with iOS 11.x:

To get the Music app to stop playing (subs) after a certain amount of time, click on Clock icon > Timer, set your time, click "When Timer Ends", scroll all the way to the bottom and select "Stop Playing".
Use this to prevent too many loops while sleeping, etc.

[Shannon]

Just FYI: DMSI 3.3 now is operating with Reality Bending 5.1. Just thought that might interest you guys.

[freerad98]

@Shannon

I can't seem to find it anywhere. What is the primary ASRB for B (and A) side US/LM?
TIA

[Shannon]

@Shannon

I can't seem to find it anywhere. What is the primary ASRB for B (and A) side US/LM?
TIA

The primary ASRB ratio isn't necessary to know for execution of the program, but if you want to know what it is, look at the ultrasonic track. In this case, for A side, it is 20 minutes of audio to 2 minutes of silence (20:2), and 30:3 for B side.

[Leo1990]

Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped.

A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again.

Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something?

Thanks

[Shannon]

Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped.

A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again.

Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something?

Thanks

It's a resistance reaction that overrides the execution response over time. It is most likely resistance to putting in the effort required, or a delayed resistance to achieving the goals of the program. I have not had anyone report this type of resistance before, to the best of my recollection.

How many loops were you using when this happened?

[sushi521]

Hey Shannon, how is the testing on the mystery sub going?