10-27-2018, 02:20 PM
(10-27-2018, 12:51 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(10-27-2018, 12:02 PM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon, how is the work with DMSI is going?
Few things to note,
You are bringing the auric shield back, yes? {block negativety} I stopped using Uslm and took a week break now I'm back with DMSI B 3.2 with 1:1 as Second ASRB.
I noticed people who I'm not sexually attracted to, try to send negativety on my way (ex: family members and friends)
Now I assume this response is because of increase of value that suddenly being added to me "dmsi"
Another thing, are you going to add wealth module(if will make a person more attractive) to DMSI?
After FRM and aura adjustment. What are you going to work on?
I would like to know this as well since I remember there was some talk about this aspect months ago. Makes sense since wealth is a factor some people take into consideration when choosing someone to go out with, etc (not saying its the end all be all though).
Also, in relation to this for 3.3 will you be adding those over 130+ factors you said women take in consideration when choosing a guy to have sex with?
Do you suppose adding those factors directly makes sense when this sub is designed to be used by any sexual orientation and preference? No, of course not. I didn't figure them out to add them individually anyway. I figured them out to understand how to create a SOPS module (Self Optimizing Polymorphic Scripting) that will work for everyone who uses it.
Quote:Lastly, will FRM version 3 be significantly more powerful that version 2? I ask because after running US/LMv2 these last 2 weeks or so I keep getting this "feeling" that something is missing. Its hard to explain really.
I have optimized v3 to the limits of my ability to do so based on what I currently know. As to whether or not it will be significantly more powerful, I would presume so, since it passed a lot of modeling runs during optimization. But until I see it in the wild, I can only say the models show it to be so.
But if you could spend some time trying to answer the question of what is missing, it would surely help for me to know. I get the feeling that v3 won't be the final version, but the more I know, the faster development will go.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!