09-17-2018, 11:21 AM
(09-17-2018, 08:00 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-17-2018, 06:05 AM)THolt Wrote: @Shannon
How did your additional tests on Beast 17 go?
I have had limited opportunity to test B17 so far, and today I am probably not going to be testing, but observing after effects.
So far, some of the tests have been mind blowing, and some have been confusing as heck. I know it is doing things, but I can't always see what it's doing in the overt reactions of the tester.
I do know that some of the changes it is making are forcing more time to be taken than design spec allows at this time, at least with the testers I have for informal testing. Formal testing may prove to be a different ballgame, but I can't do formal testing at this time.
What this has led me to is the possibility that there is something I need to adjust or add to in P6. But right now, we are far from certain of anything with the results we have gotten, except that B17 is doing things differently than B16 did.
The design goals of Beast are twofold. One of them certainly seems to have been enhanced in how and how well it is achieved. The other I am not sure of yet. This is expected; Beast is a complex program, and understanding the results typically requires almost a month of testing. That's why I said I need at least a couple weeks.
What I can say is, I see the fear removal modules doing things. Some of them I can see, some of them I suspect, some of them I understand, some of them I don't. But they are having an effect, and I will probably be refining them by one iteration before I add them to DMSI 3.3, which was half the reason I wanted to test them first: my understanding of the concept behind the approach they are taking may need improvement, adjustment, refinement, or expansion.
@Shannon Okay. I feel like we are so close to finishing the R&D on 6G via Beast but it seems we have quite a ways to go. Hope the rest of the testing goes well.