Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8

[Shannon]

I ran myself until the models were not cooperating at all lat night.  Then I went to bed and started on it again today.  The models kept telling me, "Something is wrong."  No matter what I tried, no matter what I checked, how many times I looked for what was wrong.  I was starting to get pissed, and then it clicked: there was one thing I had completely forgotten to include in the product description!  So I have been working on that ever since I figured it out.

We should be down to less than an hour before liftoff.

Basically what the models showed me is that more experienced guys can handle more intensity with less exposure time, and less experienced guys need more exposure time with less intensity and a little more cool off time.  Makes sense.  Okay, so here we are on final countdown.

Hey, @Shannon! Great news it's in the final stages before release.

I thought the predictive models were about dealing with the actual program itself. Not about weighing the sales page product description as well. You learn something new every day. Makes sense about the difference in listening requirements due to the experience level of the listener. I hate the "extra time off" thing, haha. In the past, I'd tend to feel the results taper off on things during the long layoffs and would usually curtail the days off a tiny bit to mitigate that feeling. From what you've said, 6G is "NFJ" to use the vernacular, lmao...so we'll see how the situation unfolds this time around! Your comment to someone about it making you "frogwalk to the goal" amused me too, hahaha.

Furiously refreshing the page for good news then, haha.

I was thinking earlier today, after X4A-1600, seems logical to me that two of the next short-term releases could more easily be found in OF and EPHRA. OF, already existing in the guise of OGSF, could be ported seemingly simply compared to a "from scratch" design etc. Also, since OGSF seems to be a foundation of EPHRA, maybe that one could be made AFTER OF. Seems that one would require more work than OF, currently.

Both would allow foundation work for issues needed before stepping up to "bigger" programs down the line, as well.

Just two options to throw out to you to help.

I run through the models a LOT of different variables concerning the scripting, the build process and the product description.  For example, this program required about 10.5 hours just finding and choosing the right images to use.  You guys really have no idea how ridiculously specific and nit-picky I get with making these the best I can make them behind the scenes.

I was not thrilled to see more time off for the less experienced guys, but that's what came up.  I think it has to do with processing the script, and the effects the program has on you subconsciously, as well as working yourself toward being able to open up to sex more over time.  But I have run this thing and it is intense.  I had me checking to see if the AC was on last night!

Ultimately, we will find our way.

I'm probably going to do Hormone Optimizer for Drive and Energy next.  That should be a relatively fast build, and I think it'll be useful, helpful and popular for a lot of people.