Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5

[CatMan]

Okay, fair enough! I was just trying to put myself in the body of a man from that era, to see if anything of use could be gleamed because I know I've had a measurable amount of fear. Seeing that the primitive "lizard brain" seems to be the focus in solving this issue. Maybe it goes even deeper than I thought. No worries.

I agree with you about fear being possible to turn off. It isn't permanent, there's evidence of that in everyone. It is a learned response. So, then, it can also be unlearned. The question is, just how much can you be able to get that deep into our minds, and tinker with the wiring in there to generate such a result. We shall see. I remain optimistic, but I do understand the level of complexity in such a thing. That's encouraging to hear you that have a few new approaches for FRM 4.9 and thus the new DMSI! Great news!

I respect the conflict here that you have. It would conceivably be very simple, given your words of that mind's priorities, to just buff the hell out of the fear/pain portions of things if it didn't go along with the script, in order to counterbalance the scale and then tip it in the opposite direction to avoid the new superior fear and the new superior pain. But, that would go against the ethics I've respected for a long time. So, like I said, I do respect this issue you have here...maybe if you painted a picture of a possible future if it took action positively to show it what's possible and that it can fulfill it's sexual needs through this path after all, I think you've already done that though. It may not have such a nuanced understanding of such an image anyway, or even be capable of processing such a thing.

Yeah, I was just mentioning DRS or even TRS, because they both seem to offer more benefit to the listener than NDRS. Both have their positives. I know you mentioned "energy issues" with DMSI, so TRS seemed best given that. Even if I don't understand the whole energy portion of things, just speaking to what was said to be a bottleneck of performance. Hell, even the DRS would be great for when people are “hatin’ on you”, to make them "stop their hatin’", LMAO that sales page...hahaha...I laughed and cringed at the same time. Impressive! DRS would be massively effective especially if the program starts seriously delivering, I imagine there could be a huge flood of "hatin'" taking place on users. TRS, or DRS, we'll see what is best from what you say in time.

Okay, as long as the design goal isn't being removed, no worries. I didn't think you would remove it, because that's what makes it so complex and difficult to begin with. Which was the whole point, to make it hard in order to make 6G as amazing as possible through it's possible eventual success. I hear you now.

Thanks, Shannon. REALLY looking forward to hearing all about development of FRM and DMSI in the next little bit. Very excited for that!

Post #2:

Based on what I have seen, I think that you are over-ascribing ability to think to the parts of the brain that fear seems to most deeply originate from. The parts we are dealing with have the awareness of a lizard, quite literally. They understand hunger and thirst, drive to sex, drive to safety, drive to comfort/pain avoidance, and that's about it. This is a very low level of awareness, a very instinctual and "dim" awareness, if you will. It is survival only. All the fancy stuff I have tried so far has failed to get at this level because it is not what I was aiming at with what I was doing. But because it is the root of fear, and it is not being dealt with, when triggered it naturally it keeps responding with fear.

If this is correct, then we have a very challenging situation on our hands, which is probably binary in nature. It is either possible to shut down fear, or it is not. If it is, there is very likely a very specific way to do it, which we haven't tried yet. I disagree with those who conclude that fear is "hard wired and impossible to stop", because it always results from an assessment of the surroundings or an imagined threat. In other words, it is always a reaction, not a constant or an innate state. To kill fear, we have to stop the reaction somehow. I think the key is very specific, and we just haven't tried it yet. I believe I have some very good ideas in the pipeline for how to do this.

Just thought of this...I'm not sure if it would trip the "ethical/moral sensor" or not. I have some reservations about it, it's 50/50. But still, I wanted to bounce it off you...

You mention your assertion that fear is a reaction, "it always results from an assessment of the surroundings or an imagined threat". I would agree with that. So...maybe...if we attack this from a different way, this can work. So far, you seem to have been attacking it head on, trying to overcome the fear etc. and thus getting the eventual back and forth from it. However, maybe we can do something far more subtle, but far more effective. You mention this part of the mind has a low level of awareness, and I would agree also. So perhaps, we can use that extremely limited view to our advantage here. It helps cut down potentials here.

My proposal...is to script in horse's blinders in regards to fear. Horse's blinders work extremely well at cutting the horse's field of view, to keep them focused so they don't get startled etc. by things occurring around them. The new tunnel vision keeps their perception limited to what is important, and avoiding potential fear and the consequences from said fear. So, horse's blinders, in this concept, could block the perception of possible fear, or negative consequences that are imagined and overblown, basically anything else except what's in front.

The concept was to illustrate the idea of not necessarily attacking the fear anymore, or even to acknowledge it's existence, just to cut the PERCEPTION to it. That, could subtly allow the subject to proceed without the fear registering at all.

Horse's blinders. Just a thought to get around this, from a clever problem-solving entrepreneur. Not sure if it's viable for you, or even moral/ethical, or even possible.

[CatMan]

EDIT: Combined into one post, it's easier to follow and reply to. My bad.

[Shannon]

Shannon,

Can you post the link or send me the link to the colloidal silver you used?

There is no link.  I make it myself.  I use a high end ionic silver generator and then reduce it to colloidal silver.  And no, I don't make the yellow garbage that they show you how to make on YouTube, because if it's yellow, the colloidal particles are too big and its not safe to ingest.

Since there is so much BS going on with the FDA I'm not going to be selling what I make unless and until I can get a lab test verifying that it is what I believe it to be, and I know for sure that selling it isn't going to cause me problems.  But I can point you in the direction of the only true colloidal silver solution maker that I know for sure sells true colloidal silver (as opposed to ionic silver being marketed as colloidal silver) and produces very high quality true colloidal silver:

MesoSilver, sold by PurestColloids.com.  MesoSilver is expensive, but it is also supported by some very interesting scientific studies, like this one: 

Thank you so much for this info! I’ll get the one you recommended.

Do you have any specific instructions to achieve success with it? Or does one apply it where there is an infection several times a day and that’s it?

You will have to use the instructions the manufacturer provides.

[Shannon]

Interesting that MIR 3.0 includes the DRS. Makes sense though, based on my experiences.

It surprised me.  I thought that the models would tell me not to include it, but they repeatedly showed that it produced much better results.  That makes me wonder how much of disease is influenced by people weakening eachother through their subtle energy manipulations and attacks on each other, and if some infections might actually be caused directly by such things.

It’s said that a strong navel chakra give you a strong immune system - fighting off diseases as well as other people’s energy attacks by having more clear boundaries. Wim hof who practice a type of Tim mood breathing work directly with the navel chakra and his breathing technique have been scientifically proven to improve your immune system - maybe could be interesting for you to research.

Whatever the case, MIR v3 takes this into account, and it appears to be multiples more effective for it in the models.  Which is indeed fascinating.  I have more experiments to design now concerning this.

[Shannon]

Shannon's quote from His journal:"
I have made some adjustments to the instructions for MIR v3. For Major infections, instead of 2 days on, 4 days off, it should have been 2 days on, 1 day off. That has been adjusted. Please make a note of it."

Me: How long is one loop,my guess is 1 hour & 24 minutes?  4 loops back to back right?

Good Post  Zubroka!!

One loop is 1 hour 24 minutes, yes.  4 loops back to back.

[guyinlahore]

Hi Shannon

I am currently on UMS. I know I should not switch or try other manufacturer's products during this period but sometimes running one sub can be bit boring i.e focusing on financial goal which might take ages to achieve.
Is it ok to run a hypnosis session during the rest day which is not intended to achieve any specific goal rather just for pure fun like
e.g to feel (edited as per forum rules)
or some subliminal which raises the hormonal levels to feel good
or some subliminal / hypnosis which raises your kundalini level
or maybe something which is on the sexual side like to feel an orgasm
or something along those lines which is not intended as a permanent effect rather single use.

Hi Shannon,
What are your thoughts on this ?

[Shannon]

Okay, fair enough! I was just trying to put myself in the body of a man from that era, to see if anything of use could be gleamed because I know I've had a measurable amount of fear. Seeing that the primitive "lizard brain" seems to be the focus in solving this issue. Maybe it goes even deeper than I thought. No worries.

I agree with you about fear being possible to turn off. It isn't permanent, there's evidence of that in everyone. It is a learned response. So, then, it can also be unlearned. The question is, just how much can you be able to get that deep into our minds, and tinker with the wiring in there to generate such a result. We shall see. I remain optimistic, but I do understand the level of complexity in such a thing. That's encouraging to hear you that have a few new approaches for FRM 4.9 and thus the new DMSI! Great news!

I respect the conflict here that you have. It would conceivably be very simple, given your words of that mind's priorities, to just buff the hell out of the fear/pain portions of things if it didn't go along with the script, in order to counterbalance the scale and then tip it in the opposite direction to avoid the new superior fear and the new superior pain. But, that would go against the ethics I've respected for a long time. So, like I said, I do respect this issue you have here...maybe if you painted a picture of a possible future if it took action positively to show it what's possible and that it can fulfill it's sexual needs through this path after all, I think you've already done that though. It may not have such a nuanced understanding of such an image anyway, or even be capable of processing such a thing.

Yeah, I was just mentioning DRS or even TRS, because they both seem to offer more benefit to the listener than NDRS. Both have their positives. I know you mentioned "energy issues" with DMSI, so TRS seemed best given that. Even if I don't understand the whole energy portion of things, just speaking to what was said to be a bottleneck of performance. Hell, even the DRS would be great for when people are “hatin’ on you”, to make them "stop their hatin’", LMAO that sales page...hahaha...I laughed and cringed at the same time. Impressive! DRS would be massively effective especially if the program starts seriously delivering, I imagine there could be a huge flood of "hatin'" taking place on users. TRS, or DRS, we'll see what is best from what you say in time.

Okay, as long as the design goal isn't being removed, no worries. I didn't think you would remove it, because that's what makes it so complex and difficult to begin with. Which was the whole point, to make it hard in order to make 6G as amazing as possible through it's possible eventual success. I hear you now.  

Thanks, Shannon. REALLY looking forward to hearing all about development of FRM and DMSI in the next little bit. Very excited for that!

Putting DRS in DMSI significantly concerns me.  I'm not entirely convinced that it would be a good move.  I will do so if the models indicate that it is the best option, but otherwise I will find a less potentially confrontational option.

 Post #2:

Based on what I have seen, I think that you are over-ascribing ability to think to the parts of the brain that fear seems to most deeply originate from.  The parts we are dealing with have the awareness of a lizard, quite literally.  They understand hunger and thirst, drive to sex, drive to safety, drive to comfort/pain avoidance, and that's about it.  This is a very low level of awareness, a very instinctual and "dim" awareness, if you will.  It is survival only.  All the fancy stuff I have tried so far has failed to get at this level because it is not what I was aiming at with what I was doing.  But because it is the root of fear, and it is not being dealt with, when triggered it naturally it keeps responding with fear.  

If this is correct, then we have a very challenging situation on our hands, which is probably binary in nature.  It is either possible to shut down fear, or it is not.  If it is, there is very likely a very specific way to do it, which we haven't tried yet.  I disagree with those who conclude that fear is "hard wired and impossible to stop", because it always results from an assessment of the surroundings or an imagined threat.  In other words, it is always a reaction, not a constant or an innate state.  To kill fear, we have to stop the reaction somehow.  I think the key is very specific, and we just haven't tried it yet.  I believe I have some very good ideas in the pipeline for how to do this.  

Just thought of this...I'm not sure if it would trip the "ethical/moral sensor" or not. I have some reservations about it, it's 50/50. But still, I wanted to bounce it off you...

You mention your assertion that fear is a reaction, "it always results from an assessment of the surroundings or an imagined threat". I would agree with that. So...maybe...if we attack this from a different way, this can work. So far, you seem to have been attacking it head on, trying to overcome the fear etc. and thus getting the eventual back and forth from it. However, maybe we can do something far more subtle, but far more effective. You mention this part of the mind has a low level of awareness, and I would agree also. So perhaps, we can use that extremely limited view to our advantage here. It helps cut down potentials here.

My proposal...is to script in horse's blinders in regards to fear. Horse's blinders work extremely well at cutting the horse's field of view, to keep them focused so they don't get startled etc. by things occurring around them. The new tunnel vision keeps their perception limited to what is important, and avoiding potential fear and the consequences from said fear. So, horse's blinders, in this concept, could block the perception of possible fear, or negative consequences that are imagined and overblown, basically anything else except what's in front.

The concept was to illustrate the idea of not necessarily attacking the fear anymore, or even to acknowledge it's existence, just to cut the PERCEPTION to it. That, could subtly allow the subject to proceed without the fear registering at all.

Horse's blinders. Just a thought to get around this, from a clever problem-solving entrepreneur. Not sure if it's viable for you, or even moral/ethical, or even possible.

Understandably, your awareness of what all the FRM is attempting to do is very limited and that results in some conclusions and presumptions that are significantly in error.  I obviously don't want people just walking off with my hard won methods and secrets.  But... approaching fear head-on is actually the least of what FRM does, because that, if done wrong, triggers more fear.  The methods in use are many and varied and they are complex and very interactive amongst themselves to form a synergistic result.  We don't want to trigger fear, we want to drop it.  Kind of like your instinctual response to a dagger in the back would be to try to tense the muscles in pain, thus causing more pain, when the best response is to relax completely.  Instinctively, people react to fear with more fear.  The key is to let go of it, but so far nothing I have tried has fully worked because the subconscious is a very complex array of parts and levels of awareness, which all have different cognitive potentials.  The subconscious, in some ways, appears very much to be a fractal/holographic design.  It is extremely complex, and influencing one part will not necessarily change the rest of it, and they will simply change it back.  The whole must be changed at a time, which, given the fractal/holographic design, makes it both very difficult and very easy to do so at the same time.  In other words... it's a nightmare of complexity, variables and gotchas to deal with.

"Blinders" is one possibility that I had concluded was worth exploring.  It is not the only idea I have for exploring though, and I suspect that it will turn out to be too simple an approach, if my previous results hold.  But who knows, I am surprised by what is going on with the subconscious on a regular basis, even to this day.  I appreciate the input.

[Shannon]

Hi Shannon

I am currently on UMS. I know I should not switch or try other manufacturer's products during this period but sometimes running one sub can be bit boring i.e focusing on financial goal which might take ages to achieve.
Is it ok to run a hypnosis session during the rest day which is not intended to achieve any specific goal rather just for pure fun like
e.g to feel (edited as per forum rules)
or some subliminal which raises the hormonal levels to feel good
or some subliminal / hypnosis which raises your kundalini level
or maybe something which is on the sexual side like to feel an orgasm
or something along those lines which is not intended as a permanent effect rather single use.

Hi Shannon,
What are your thoughts on this ?

If the mind programming has no interaction with or affect on the programming of the subliminal, then it should be okay.

[Yous]

Hello, 


It was interesting this last conversation, i have some ideas just in case you didn´t think about all of them and if this is the case if they could help in some way.


Before i would like to say that the shields that do something else than protecting seems to be more useful for me...two in one...


Related with this and with the fear, i wonder, if it's possible to transform the negative energy in something useful, could be possible to transform other type of energy in something useful for the program to maximice the effect not using only the negative energy...for example...the fear  the people around  feel...or making a shield that use all this energy to help us to face our fears...


Related with the fear, many times as you said Shannon, we fear something that we have imagine conconcuis or unconsciously, and if its conscious imagining what could be the worst thing that could happen helps us, because many times if that fear came true would not be so terrible as we imagine...could help to give to the subconscious that same instruction to imagine the worst? For example, i have fear to talk to a woman...what could be the worst thing that could happen? Is not he end of the world...


One step more for example could be to give the instruction to the subconscious to imagine after this exactly the opposite of this fear, what could be the best that could happen...


Another idea is to use the subliminal to ask to the subconscious what fears do we have and why and how to overcome it.


I would also put in the equation not only the fear to the death, as well the fear of suffering, the fear to the shame, the fear to the failure, etc...


And maybe another approach could be to show to the subconscious that the death it's no so bad, its necessary and there is no suffering in the death, is the peace, but of course we need the survival instinct...


I suppose that you have considered all of this but i can not be sure because i don't know the scripts, so just in case 

[ncbeareatingman]

Interesting that MIR 3.0 includes the DRS. Makes sense though, based on my experiences.

It surprised me.  I thought that the models would tell me not to include it, but they repeatedly showed that it produced much better results.  That makes me wonder how much of disease is influenced by people weakening eachother through their subtle energy manipulations and attacks on each other, and if some infections might actually be caused directly by such things.

 Yes this is absolutely one of the many reason 'people go down for the count' with certain manifested dis-eases...the lack of ease... brand named dis-eases,too.  Like He throws his weight around,or she has her hooks in him, or he's called Professor "Spike" for a reason,stabbing peoples energy fields and leaving them open for dark,negative,weakening energies to 'get it' and cause further damage to the whole system... its like letting a cut or injury go 'un-treated',its open literally for infections.there are solutions however!!

 theres more to this,but I absolutely know that many many dis-eases,have thier basis in energetics and from 'abusive' shit from others thrown at them,or punches,spiked,hurled at their energy field and related.
  Im so glad I have this DRS going and some else I use, to help me ward that bad shit off,I've got enough to deal with on this planet!!

looking forward to see how MIR v3 comes to light in healing/helping others...along with their other applicable protocols( medication,Health care pro's,alternative ,Herbal. Colloidal Silvers,tinctures,Essential Oils,ect)

[Shannon]

Hello, 


It was interesting this last conversation, i have some ideas just in case you didn´t think about all of them and if this is the case if they could help in some way.


Before i would like to say that the shields that do something else than protecting seems to be more useful for me...two in one...


Related with this and with the fear, i wonder, if it's possible to transform the negative energy in something useful, could be possible to transform other type of energy in something useful for the program to maximice the effect not using only the negative energy...for example...the fear  the people around  feel...or making a shield that use all this energy to help us to face our fears...

I am not sure I understand you here, it sounds like you're suggesting a shield that takes energy from people in your environment to transform and use.  That would be energy vampirism, and it is possible, but very bad news.  I don't think we need energy to help us face our fears, what we need is to somehow trigger a different response.

Related with the fear, many times as you said Shannon, we fear something that we have imagine conconcuis or unconsciously, and if its conscious imagining what could be the worst thing that could happen helps us, because many times if that fear came true would not be so terrible as we imagine...could help to give to the subconscious that same instruction to imagine the worst? For example, i have fear to talk to a woman...what could be the worst thing that could happen? Is not he end of the world...

It would only make things worse to suggest to the subconscious to imagine the worst that could happen.  Trust me, that would be VERY bad news.  If that sort of approach would work, what I already have created in v4.8 of FRM would also have already worked.  Not because it uses that idea, but because if the subconscious understood logic in the right ways for it to work, we would already have developed a solution in what I have done so far.

One step more for example could be to give the instruction to the subconscious to imagine after this exactly the opposite of this fear, what could be the best that could happen...


Another idea is to use the subliminal to ask to the subconscious what fears do we have and why and how to overcome it.


I would also put in the equation not only the fear to the death, as well the fear of suffering, the fear to the shame, the fear to the failure, etc...


And maybe another approach could be to show to the subconscious that the death it's no so bad, its necessary and there is no suffering in the death, is the peace, but of course we need the survival instinct...


I suppose that you have considered all of this but i can not be sure because i don't know the scripts, so just in case 

All of this has been considered, and what works has already been used.  But I do appreciate the attempt at offering new options.

[Shannon]

Interesting that MIR 3.0 includes the DRS. Makes sense though, based on my experiences.

It surprised me.  I thought that the models would tell me not to include it, but they repeatedly showed that it produced much better results.  That makes me wonder how much of disease is influenced by people weakening eachother through their subtle energy manipulations and attacks on each other, and if some infections might actually be caused directly by such things.

 Yes this is absolutely one of the many reason 'people go down for the count' with certain manifested dis-eases...the lack of ease... brand named dis-eases,too.  Like He throws his weight around,or she has her hooks in him, or he's called Professor "Spike" for a reason,stabbing peoples energy fields and leaving them open for dark,negative,weakening energies to 'get it' and cause further damage to the whole system... its like letting a cut or injury go 'un-treated',its open literally for infections.there are solutions however!!

 theres more to this,but I absolutely know that many many dis-eases,have thier basis in energetics and from 'abusive' shit from others thrown at them,or punches,spiked,hurled at their energy field and related.
  Im so glad I have this DRS going and some else I use, to help me ward that bad shit off,I've got enough to deal with on this planet!!

looking forward to see how MIR v3 comes to light in healing/helping others...along with their other applicable protocols( medication,Health care pro's,alternative ,Herbal. Colloidal Silvers,tinctures,Essential Oils,ect)

It seems that disease boils down to three major things, which all in turn boil down to one primary thing... and that is... everything is energy.

I hope that people will use MIR v3 by itself whenever possible so we know what it's doing, instead of "Oh, that might be MIR, but it might also be X, Y or Z," which doesn't tell us anything about how MIR v3 works or what it is capable of triggering the immune system to do.

[EvolvingPhoenix]

Okay, fair enough! I was just trying to put myself in the body of a man from that era, to see if anything of use could be gleamed because I know I've had a measurable amount of fear. Seeing that the primitive "lizard brain" seems to be the focus in solving this issue. Maybe it goes even deeper than I thought. No worries.

I agree with you about fear being possible to turn off. It isn't permanent, there's evidence of that in everyone. It is a learned response. So, then, it can also be unlearned. The question is, just how much can you be able to get that deep into our minds, and tinker with the wiring in there to generate such a result. We shall see. I remain optimistic, but I do understand the level of complexity in such a thing. That's encouraging to hear you that have a few new approaches for FRM 4.9 and thus the new DMSI! Great news!

I respect the conflict here that you have. It would conceivably be very simple, given your words of that mind's priorities, to just buff the hell out of the fear/pain portions of things if it didn't go along with the script, in order to counterbalance the scale and then tip it in the opposite direction to avoid the new superior fear and the new superior pain. But, that would go against the ethics I've respected for a long time. So, like I said, I do respect this issue you have here...maybe if you painted a picture of a possible future if it took action positively to show it what's possible and that it can fulfill it's sexual needs through this path after all, I think you've already done that though. It may not have such a nuanced understanding of such an image anyway, or even be capable of processing such a thing.

Yeah, I was just mentioning DRS or even TRS, because they both seem to offer more benefit to the listener than NDRS. Both have their positives. I know you mentioned "energy issues" with DMSI, so TRS seemed best given that. Even if I don't understand the whole energy portion of things, just speaking to what was said to be a bottleneck of performance. Hell, even the DRS would be great for when people are “hatin’ on you”, to make them "stop their hatin’", LMAO that sales page...hahaha...I laughed and cringed at the same time. Impressive! DRS would be massively effective especially if the program starts seriously delivering, I imagine there could be a huge flood of "hatin'" taking place on users. TRS, or DRS, we'll see what is best from what you say in time.

Okay, as long as the design goal isn't being removed, no worries. I didn't think you would remove it, because that's what makes it so complex and difficult to begin with. Which was the whole point, to make it hard in order to make 6G as amazing as possible through it's possible eventual success. I hear you now.  

Thanks, Shannon. REALLY looking forward to hearing all about development of FRM and DMSI in the next little bit. Very excited for that!

Putting DRS in DMSI significantly concerns me.  I'm not entirely convinced that it would be a good move.  I will do so if the models indicate that it is the best option, but otherwise I will find a less potentially confrontational option.

 Post #2:

Based on what I have seen, I think that you are over-ascribing ability to think to the parts of the brain that fear seems to most deeply originate from.  The parts we are dealing with have the awareness of a lizard, quite literally.  They understand hunger and thirst, drive to sex, drive to safety, drive to comfort/pain avoidance, and that's about it.  This is a very low level of awareness, a very instinctual and "dim" awareness, if you will.  It is survival only.  All the fancy stuff I have tried so far has failed to get at this level because it is not what I was aiming at with what I was doing.  But because it is the root of fear, and it is not being dealt with, when triggered it naturally it keeps responding with fear.  

If this is correct, then we have a very challenging situation on our hands, which is probably binary in nature.  It is either possible to shut down fear, or it is not.  If it is, there is very likely a very specific way to do it, which we haven't tried yet.  I disagree with those who conclude that fear is "hard wired and impossible to stop", because it always results from an assessment of the surroundings or an imagined threat.  In other words, it is always a reaction, not a constant or an innate state.  To kill fear, we have to stop the reaction somehow.  I think the key is very specific, and we just haven't tried it yet.  I believe I have some very good ideas in the pipeline for how to do this.  

Just thought of this...I'm not sure if it would trip the "ethical/moral sensor" or not. I have some reservations about it, it's 50/50. But still, I wanted to bounce it off you...

You mention your assertion that fear is a reaction, "it always results from an assessment of the surroundings or an imagined threat". I would agree with that. So...maybe...if we attack this from a different way, this can work. So far, you seem to have been attacking it head on, trying to overcome the fear etc. and thus getting the eventual back and forth from it. However, maybe we can do something far more subtle, but far more effective. You mention this part of the mind has a low level of awareness, and I would agree also. So perhaps, we can use that extremely limited view to our advantage here. It helps cut down potentials here.

My proposal...is to script in horse's blinders in regards to fear. Horse's blinders work extremely well at cutting the horse's field of view, to keep them focused so they don't get startled etc. by things occurring around them. The new tunnel vision keeps their perception limited to what is important, and avoiding potential fear and the consequences from said fear. So, horse's blinders, in this concept, could block the perception of possible fear, or negative consequences that are imagined and overblown, basically anything else except what's in front.

The concept was to illustrate the idea of not necessarily attacking the fear anymore, or even to acknowledge it's existence, just to cut the PERCEPTION to it. That, could subtly allow the subject to proceed without the fear registering at all.

Horse's blinders. Just a thought to get around this, from a clever problem-solving entrepreneur. Not sure if it's viable for you, or even moral/ethical, or even possible.

Understandably, your awareness of what all the FRM is attempting to do is very limited and that results in some conclusions and presumptions that are significantly in error.  I obviously don't want people just walking off with my hard won methods and secrets.  But... approaching fear head-on is actually the least of what FRM does, because that, if done wrong, triggers more fear.  The methods in use are many and varied and they are complex and very interactive amongst themselves to form a synergistic result.  We don't want to trigger fear, we want to drop it.  Kind of like your instinctual response to a dagger in the back would be to try to tense the muscles in pain, thus causing more pain, when the best response is to relax completely.  Instinctively, people react to fear with more fear.  The key is to let go of it, but so far nothing I have tried has fully worked because the subconscious is a very complex array of parts and levels of awareness, which all have different cognitive potentials.  The subconscious, in some ways, appears very much to be a fractal/holographic design.  It is extremely complex, and influencing one part will not necessarily change the rest of it, and they will simply change it back.  The whole must be changed at a time, which, given the fractal/holographic design, makes it both very difficult and very easy to do so at the same time.  In other words... it's a nightmare of complexity, variables and gotchas to deal with.

"Blinders" is one possibility that I had concluded was worth exploring.  It is not the only idea I have for exploring though, and I suspect that it will turn out to be too simple an approach, if my previous results hold.  But who knows, I am surprised by what is going on with the subconscious on a regular basis, even to this day.  I appreciate the input.

From what I've been learning, the way to grt rid of fear (and the real way anything is truly learned from it) is to fully experience it. To "process" the fear and discharge it by fully experiencing it. If you're trying to get rid of it, the best way out is through. In fact, I think that's the only way out, and if you get out anybother way, I think what happens is you just manifest another traumatic situation like the one that created the fear un the first place so you can experience it like you refused to the last time. Only way to learn the hidden lesson it has to teach. So you unconsciously will manifest another chance to face it, so you can learn the lesson you didn't learn the first time around. At least, that's based on what I've been told from people who have worked real closely with it and learned a lot about healing it. That's why I'm looking to process my fear by experiencing it fully. But I don't know how to get into it. My German mentor says to "relax into it" maybe there's a way to get the subconcious mind to "relax into" the fear and process the emotion fully?

[Aventus45]

Shannon, Since MIR v3 is done, what are you planning on working on next?