03-02-2012, 04:12 PM
(03-02-2012, 03:55 PM)Shannon Wrote: Well... consider. The program I used was seeking my "perfect lover". The subconscious is literal, so it looked for the woman who would be most sexually compatible with me for maximum sexual frequency, pleasure, cooperation and agreement as to what was desirable. Indeed, it found exactly that for me: whatever I like, she liked receiving from me or giving to me. Whatever I enjoy doing, she enjoyed doing with me. Whatever I want, she wanted too - or at least wanted to please me enough to try to keep up when she normally would not want to on her own. She was the perfect answer to me sexually.
Had I kept trying to specify quality X, Y and Z, I would never have thought to allow myself to meet a black woman, because I didn't consciously know that there were any black women who had certain qualities I need before I am attracted to a woman; in my area, it is extremely uncommon for black people to speak in my accent, which seems to be one of those things in my love map that I didn't realize until this happened. Certain accents turn me on, and certain accents turn me off, black or not. My own simply unlocks a particular door, and allows the woman to pass. There are other qualities, as well, but again, had I relied on my limited conscious mind, I would have found a much less good sexual match for myself, because my conscious mind is pathetically limited in awareness of the world around me in comparison to my subconscious mind, which has access to the collective awareness and thus can know about anyone and everyone on the planet!
I actually felt fear when I started that program because it was my first experiment in allowing my subconscious to choose for me, based on the "perfect" criteria. Previous, my experiments had been very complex affairs in which 20 or more traits would be carefully mapped out and specified all at once. While I always got exactly what I asked for that way, I never got exactly what I wanted, which is why I switched to the simpler way and allowed my more knowledgeable subconscious to find the right one for me based on my primary key (in this case, the best possible sexual lover for me at the time).
The subconscious has sometimes got different definitions, but more often it simply has access to vastly more information. I cannot know what my neighbor's personality is like behind closed doors, sexually, for instance, but my subconscious apparently can. The superconscious mind is the mind which we all seem to share access to, and through. Literally, I can (subconsciously) access this awareness and look for anything I want in a person, and quickly locate the best respondants worldwide, and then act on that knowledge.
I know that because of my previous experiments, which were impossible chance-wise, and were too consistent and specific in results. When I asked for the perfect naturally redheaded woman to come into my life, and then specified more than 20 physical qualities she should have down to the size, shape and color of her aureolas, etc. - did she show up? Yes she did. The only example of what I was asking for in the entire world, and I know that based on her geographical distance from me. My experiments show that the responder will always arrive from the closest possible distance for what you are asking for. She was literally around the world from me, in Australia.
As for the subliminal suggestion, it is possible to do that, but may be dangerous. We don't know what that would result in, or what that would do, if the subconscious has some sort of faulty logic based programming that we were unaware of previously. In many cases, the conscious disagreement with the subconscious is a god thing, because of the fact that the conscious understands logic and reasoning so much better in some ways.
This makes a lot of sense-the disparity between the preferences of the two seem important+if the subconscious can access more information than it would probably help the conscious in and/or the manifestation aspect. If it was simply a conscious manifestation there could be problems with satisfying the requirements of said manifestation i.e. 'perfect'
1. There is always some madness in love. But there is also always some reason in madness.
2. A thinker sees his own actions as experiments and questions... Success and failure are for him answers above all.
3. I would not know what the spirit of a philosopher might wish more then to be than a good dancer.-F.N.
2. A thinker sees his own actions as experiments and questions... Success and failure are for him answers above all.
3. I would not know what the spirit of a philosopher might wish more then to be than a good dancer.-F.N.