11-14-2016, 01:55 PM
(11-14-2016, 12:47 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Shannon, continuing from Tao's journal, as not to hijack his thread, I'm curious: While I admire the faith you have in the power of the technologies you've invented regarding subliminal and anti-resistance tech, don't you think you may be over-reaching on the conclusion you seem to have stated as fact?
I think you are missing a lot of variables, and I don't see how you can reach a conclusion of that sort with any degree of certainty when you lack such a large amount of information. Aren't you discounting love (for not just my wife, but my kids), level of commitment, deep-seated core-beliefs (IE morality), the Optimus Engine, free will & my personal self-efficacy regarding willpower to say "No thanks," not-to-mention many other factors that would have to be discussed in the Chatterbox.
For the sake of argument, do you believe (if you created such a subliminal) that you could cause someone to commit murder? Because to me, though I enjoy the attention of a woman and checking out a nice ass, stepping out on my wife - feeling the way I feel about her - is akin to my desire to murder someone in a planned/calculated way. Perhaps, using this analogy, you would equate the possibility of having an affair in this case to voluntary manslaughter? An intentional act of passion, in the moment, without prior intent?
Is there any possibility that a statement could be added to DMSI to protect those in valued relationships - one that wouldn't affect those not in a relationship, or a relationship they don't give a shit about? Perhaps a statement to the effect that the user's partner (if valued) would be willing to share, be forgiving, and remove/lessen fear of loss? I think most people see "cheating" as losing someone to another - emotionally, physically, whatever. Just throwing that possibility out there.
I'm not the kind of person that wants to operate from a place of denial. I really am running this subliminal to heal from neediness, increase my internal self-image, and rid myself of woman-related validation issues. I also, honestly, feel closer to my wife than when I started DMSI. I'm not giving false feedback when I say our relationship is better. If we fight, it's usually during a period of high resistance and/or stress on my part, or because I'm not satisfied with my career path. I'm the hothead in the relationship. I can be a real asshole, and say the meanest shit I can think of - seeing the weakest part of a person, the real hot-button issues, and press on it with a red-hot poker. "You always go for the jugular," I've been told. Anyway, if my marriage ever failed, I fear it'd be from my ability to be a world-class jerk than doing anything to betray my wife.
EDIT: No rush on a response, especially if you're in work flow. Whenever is cool.
What I have seen my 6G prototypes do tells me that yes, I can do what I say I can do. I just need to have all the technology developed, harvested, in place and aligned properly, and then pointed at the goal.
Eventually, DMSI will have to be capable of taking even a person who is happily married with kids and completely destroying anything in its way to achieve it's goals. Otherwise people will not achieve the goals of the program with high degrees of certainty.
It cannot do that yet, but it will be able to eventually.
As for love, commitment, free will, etc. - all of that can be changed with the core beliefs of the person. When the final is released, it will be capable of doing whatever is necessary to achieve its goals. Otherwise, I will be issuing refunds.
I understand why you're using it, an you will probably be able to enjoy it for a while longer before it goes too far - but it is not and never has been designed for a situation where the person was in or expected to keep an existing relationship while using it, and changing that design goal is contrary to the program's core goals.
Quote:For the sake of argument, do you believe (if you created such a subliminal) that you could cause someone to commit murder? Because to me, though I enjoy the attention of a woman and checking out a nice ass, stepping out on my wife - feeling the way I feel about her - is akin to my desire to murder someone in a planned/calculated way. Perhaps, using this analogy, you would equate the possibility of having an affair in this case to voluntary manslaughter? An intentional act of passion, in the moment, without prior intent?
With the right type, level and amount of influence, anything is possible. And as the program grows in power, complexity and completion, you will be walking a thinner and thinner trail up the mountain until it becomes almost impossible not to slip and fall.
I do not wish that DMSI destroy anyone's existing relationship, but at the same time, it is not designed for people in existing relationships, and never was. It is designed to create a mutually beneficial situation in which I can develop the 6G skeleton script while developing a program that maintains the interest and demand necessary to motivate me to keep working until I achieve the goal. It has had warnings on the description page since day one about that.
And as I said before, you'll probably be able to keep enjoying it for a while longer. But in the not too distant future, it will be more than nearly anyone can resist. At that point, your options for resistance will amount to stop using it, or fail to resist it.
I cannot disclose what I have seen in my experiments with my 6G prototype a lot of times. But this technology is incredibly powerful. The only limits, in the end, are going to be... is it attuned correctly to achieve the goal? And eventually, I am going to attempt to make it polymorphic even for that.
So be warned, and be careful. You may want to discuss this with the wife before you try 3.0 or maybe 3.1.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!