09-09-2016, 10:14 PM
This question mainly applies to 5.5G subs that have an amount of recommended loops that results in a total back-to-back play time of less than a full night's sleep (e.g. 8 or more hours).
Is running loops overnight more effective when the playlist ends closer to expected waking time or does it not matter?
A recent example is DMSI 2.4, an ASRB of 30:2 and 5 loops recommended, total play time 5h10m, played back-to-back. If run overnight, since most people do not have players that allow scheduling playlists to start would it be more advantageous to add 2-3 hours of silence before the 5 loops, ensuring the final loop ends right before waking up, or would it not matter and for overnight running convenience just press play before sleep and let the loops end hours before waking?
Is running loops overnight more effective when the playlist ends closer to expected waking time or does it not matter?
A recent example is DMSI 2.4, an ASRB of 30:2 and 5 loops recommended, total play time 5h10m, played back-to-back. If run overnight, since most people do not have players that allow scheduling playlists to start would it be more advantageous to add 2-3 hours of silence before the 5 loops, ensuring the final loop ends right before waking up, or would it not matter and for overnight running convenience just press play before sleep and let the loops end hours before waking?
A Better Alex (ISTJ): EPRHA → ASC → AM6 → …
A Sexy Alex (ESTJ-T): BIABWS+DAOS → DMSI → …
A Better Alex (ENFJ-T): AM6 → …
A Sexy Alex (ESTJ-T): BIABWS+DAOS → DMSI → …
A Better Alex (ENFJ-T): AM6 → …