Ironically, my original comment was going to reference you Samba, but I wasn't sure.
I was positive you were the guy starting V3.1, then singing it's praises constantly everywhere about how amazing it is in a vague general sense, but not seeming to have REAL results with women. Even when people weren't having results you would appear and gush about it. Then, you stopped it and moved on, and started saying it wasn't working at all for you the whole time. Is that you? I've been confused about that for some time now. I was very sure it was you, but I didn't want to throw you under the bus prematurely. So I'll take the chance to clarify now since it's fresh in my mind and you posted now.
I was positive you were the guy starting V3.1, then singing it's praises constantly everywhere about how amazing it is in a vague general sense, but not seeming to have REAL results with women. Even when people weren't having results you would appear and gush about it. Then, you stopped it and moved on, and started saying it wasn't working at all for you the whole time. Is that you? I've been confused about that for some time now. I was very sure it was you, but I didn't want to throw you under the bus prematurely. So I'll take the chance to clarify now since it's fresh in my mind and you posted now.


. Plus, given how long the program has under performed for, how many people have struggled to see anything tangible, I don't put too much stock in one single guy going on about how amazing it is out of nowhere then vanishing. Especially since he spoke of learning PUA stuff, so it's unknown now about what variable has really made the difference. Try one thing at a time, as Shannon always says, so you know what's working and what isn't. And one person to me doesn't outweigh all the others. Plus the guy alluded to having success with women BEFORE DMSI, so he still then falls into the group of getting sex with women BEFORE the sub if so. Regardless, his "results" maybe someday will be the norm, obviously it isn't now. Samba used to do that a lot, then he turned and went 180 and started saying the program didn't work for him. Regardless, this is the problem, when people want to find "good" stuff to support the program currently and disqualify all the people on it struggling to see results for some reason to defend the program like it's a personal affront, they grasps at straws. "Well there was that one guy...or there was this poster awhile ago...". Kinda proves my point that there's very little good press for it, and that the overwhelming majority have little to no success currently. Which is fine, it's still obviously not done, but to invalidate the crushing majority of people *actually reporting* in favour of one guy reporting and vanishing while singing PUA's praise alongside it muddying the view of whether or not it was even DMSI that did it for him, and all these alleged phantom executers that haven't ever posted but somehow it's known they're getting full design goal off somewhere...seems backwards to me. I know negative posts are hated, I've taken huge criticism for simply reporting my experience on the sub as requested as a tester, I know everyone wants the program to work and hates the idea it doesn't, but the only way we will get there is not living in denial and reporting honestly about what works and what doesn't.