DMSI 3.3.2, OED, X124, PSEv3, etc.

[Shannon]

@Shannon

How important is it to have NO gaps in the listening?

Depending on various circumstances, it will take me between 45 minutes and 2+ days to figure out the ideal ASRB for each program.  It can actually require more time than building the program did.  If it was not sufficiently important, I would not do that much work on that one point.

e.g. if I get a phone call and I was listening to the loop on my phone does that mean I need to start over or just resume where I left off? Should I roll back and pick up a couple minutes before the interruption?

Life happens, and few of us can predict phone calls and plan ahead.  When life happens, do your best to minimize the interruption and then just keep going.  Don't add time or try to start over.

If I need to switch devices from one I'm using at my desk to my phone and I'm in the middle of a loop, does it do any harm to more-or-less switch to where I left off on the new device?

You can switch without major issue by setting your "switching to" device to a specific point say a minute or two ahead of what is currently playing, and then turning it on and the other off at that point in time.  I suggest you do this during a period of silence in the subliminal audio.  You can see where these periods are by loading up the hybrid or ultrasonic tracks in Audacity.  Audacity is a free audio editor that is available for Linux, Windows and Apple operating systems.

[rono]

It's highly recommended to keep the loops back to back without interruption.

If "life" intervenes, then "life" intervenes, but it's way better to avoid gaps whenever possible. These programs have been created with great care for effectiveness and efficiency regarding subliminal input. I believe it's explained on the product description page.

IIRC, if anything interrupts, it's recommended to start from the beginning of the entire "run" (so all loops, back to back), if you can.

Also wanted to note I tend to use the term "ablution" for showering and hygiene as well.

Thanks for the response-- so to be clear:

If I've listened to two loops and 15 minutes into the third loop, I have to take a call that turns off the sub as I listen on my phone, I should not try to go to my computer and start the third loop about 15 minutes in, rather just start again after the call is over?

Also, to your knowledge is there no harm then in listening through 2 and half loops and then going back and listening to 4 loops back-to-back?

These are interesting questions to me because I have only successfully listened to 4 loops in the ideal back-to-back manner once in the last 6 days.

I'm enough used to the way we respond to the sub that I may try doing a 4 loop back to back tonight. It's hard to do this without there being noises other than the sub. e.g. I have a bluetooth device that I really like called a DOSS soundbox. When it turns itself off, it makes a loud beeping noise. It's brief but would be disturbing during the night. The phone I usually keep in the other room for radiation reasons... This will take some creativity to limiting it to 4 loops during the night without getting awakened by beeps one way or another....

Just decided to create a tf/microsd card that has a series of 4 copies of the silent mp3 followed by non-state-shifting subs from another vendor, based on what I can see there shouldn't be any interference, unless Shannon disagrees. I have to put something silent on the card that is long enough so it doesn't shut itself off till after we've gotten up in the morning. Most nights we sleep 6 hours and 4 loops = about 5 hours.

Thoughts anyone?

[Have at ye]

Nah, follow Shannon's advice when it comes to interrupted loops, I was basing that assumption on things I remember reading here or there on the forums, not all of it may be up-to-date or accurate. Personally, when something interrupts my loops, I pretty much always simply choose to "keep going from where I left off" unless it happens during the very first loop.

As to interference from other vendors' subliminal products - I'm going to go on a limb here and say that Shannon is going to disagree. Hard. Don't mix mind programming from different producers. That's a hard rule and this I can state with full certitude.

[rono]

@Shannon

How important is it to have NO gaps in the listening?

Depending on various circumstances, it will take me between 45 minutes and 2+ days to figure out the ideal ASRB for each program.  It can actually require more time than building the program did.  If it was not sufficiently important, I would not do that much work on that one point.

e.g. if I get a phone call and I was listening to the loop on my phone does that mean I need to start over or just resume where I left off? Should I roll back and pick up a couple minutes before the interruption?

Life happens, and few of us can predict phone calls and plan ahead.  When life happens, do your best to minimize the interruption and then just keep going.  Don't add time or try to start over.

If I need to switch devices from one I'm using at my desk to my phone and I'm in the middle of a loop, does it do any harm to more-or-less switch to where I left off on the new device?

You can switch without major issue by setting your "switching to" device to a specific point say a minute or two ahead of what is currently playing, and then turning it on and the other off at that point in time.  I suggest you do this during a period of silence in the subliminal audio.  You can see where these periods are by loading up the hybrid or ultrasonic tracks in Audacity.  Audacity is a free audio editor that is available for Linux, Windows and Apple operating systems.

Thank you for this, Shannon! Just the answers I needed. I'll download Audacity and make a note of the ideal momentary breakpoints. Much appreciated.
I may have posted similar questions in a recent post, we overlapped... so feel free to ignore them.
It's nice to know I haven't been 'breaking the rules' too badly.
My next question is simpler...
Is there any harm in turning off the loop in the middle? e.g. I have finished listening to the 4 loops but forget to turn it off after the 4th one until I'm about 1/3 to 3/4 of the way through it. Is this an issue or should I listen through to the end of the ASRB section on that 5th time through?

[Shannon]

Is there any harm in turning off the loop in the middle? e.g. I have finished listening to the 4 loops but forget to turn it off after the 4th one until I'm about 1/3 to 3/4 of the way through it. Is this an issue or should I listen through to the end of the ASRB section on that 5th time through?

It should be fine to stop whenever you like, although it is always best to do the right number of loops instead.

[Have at ye]

Well, once DMSI gets going for real, the effects are waaaay more blatant and obvious than simply an increase in attention and such.

You guys sound like a healthy couple, so you may attempt to resist full execution out of loyalty to one another, but - on the other hand - because you sound like a healthy couple, you may have relatively few reasons to resist execution apart from that - so sooner or later the program *might* (and I'm going out on a limb here and say *will*) override that.

Whilst it does not have anything in particular in it to "change your morality" as far as I am aware, it's primary goal is to have people you are attracted to act on the attraction directly by initiating physical, in-person sex, and there are no limitations as to whom it affects (it's based on a set of subconscious criteria). And since it's also a work-in-progress on getting rid of resistance to subliminal programs, it's designed to get the user to execute it fully, and thus would require the user to actually become *open and willing* to achieve the above effect, as far as I can tell.

Just keep this caveat in mind.

Thanks for the response Have at ye...

I have not read anyone in the forums sharing the kind of outcomes you describe. If you have had some, or can point me to them, I am very interested in the nature of the changes it introduces to your mentality and behavior, as well as how you feel. 

Thanks for enhancing the warning. I am being very vigilant and will watch for hints at danger signs. I know her quite well so I'd be VERY surprised if she were to suddenly start going out on me or to respond to male attention in any overt way. Still, I'm keeping watch....

https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Who-d...#pid231056 - here, for instance. And when I say "drag me to the bathroom" to make out, I do mean it in a very... direct way. She grabbed me by the shirt and used force.  We only stopped enjoying ourselves upon noticing there's no lock on the bathroom door (don't ask, I don't know either).

Some people have also reported even more "all the way" situations every now and again on the various versions of DMSI. You'd have to dig into the forum archives.

Glad you guys are enjoying yourselves, though.  BTW., should you be interested, I believe the new Life Tune Up 5.5g  has an "improved love-life" module among all its other modules, so that could be an option to use in a committed relationship as well, I believe.

Hi Have at ya,

I did read that report, but it sounded like a one-off and if one is out looking and open for action I've read and heard that that sort of thing happens anyway. Sometimes the male-female chemistry is just right and the amount of alcohol consumed is in that sweet spot (not too much for the lady at least).... leads to unanticipated results. 
Now if this has started happening to you with regularity or increased frequency, that would be interesting.
How many times had you run an 8 / 4 day cycle when you got that reaction? It's a long thread and had a hard time finding the situation you describe again.

Thanks for your feedback!

Sorry for not responding earlier, I missed this post.

Frankly, I've had an experience of similar magnitude exactly the week prior to this one, but even more public. Although, true enough, the women in question did consume alcohol, but the one from the linked post was faaaar from being blotto. The one the week before, was quite inebriated by the end of the night out, though.

I believe the alcohol may have made the women more disinhibited for sure, but DMSI worked its magic as well - I've been using these programs from the very first iteration (back when it was called Develop an Aura of Sexual Irresistibility ); with each version, it becomes more obvious whenever they kick in.

I've been getting fun, visible results pretty much once per week/once every two weeks ever since that kicked in. Sometimes from more than one female at a time, heh. There's a fairly good chance the current version of the program is going to start resulting in direct, all the way situations given enough exposure.

[rono]

Well, once DMSI gets going for real, the effects are waaaay more blatant and obvious than simply an increase in attention and such.

You guys sound like a healthy couple, so you may attempt to resist full execution out of loyalty to one another, but - on the other hand - because you sound like a healthy couple, you may have relatively few reasons to resist execution apart from that - so sooner or later the program *might* (and I'm going out on a limb here and say *will*) override that.

Whilst it does not have anything in particular in it to "change your morality" as far as I am aware, it's primary goal is to have people you are attracted to act on the attraction directly by initiating physical, in-person sex, and there are no limitations as to whom it affects (it's based on a set of subconscious criteria). And since it's also a work-in-progress on getting rid of resistance to subliminal programs, it's designed to get the user to execute it fully, and thus would require the user to actually become *open and willing* to achieve the above effect, as far as I can tell.

Just keep this caveat in mind.

Thanks for the response Have at ye...

I have not read anyone in the forums sharing the kind of outcomes you describe. If you have had some, or can point me to them, I am very interested in the nature of the changes it introduces to your mentality and behavior, as well as how you feel. 

Thanks for enhancing the warning. I am being very vigilant and will watch for hints at danger signs. I know her quite well so I'd be VERY surprised if she were to suddenly start going out on me or to respond to male attention in any overt way. Still, I'm keeping watch....

https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Who-d...#pid231056 - here, for instance. And when I say "drag me to the bathroom" to make out, I do mean it in a very... direct way. She grabbed me by the shirt and used force.  We only stopped enjoying ourselves upon noticing there's no lock on the bathroom door (don't ask, I don't know either).

Some people have also reported even more "all the way" situations every now and again on the various versions of DMSI. You'd have to dig into the forum archives.

Glad you guys are enjoying yourselves, though.  BTW., should you be interested, I believe the new Life Tune Up 5.5g  has an "improved love-life" module among all its other modules, so that could be an option to use in a committed relationship as well, I believe.

Hi Have at ya,

I did read that report, but it sounded like a one-off and if one is out looking and open for action I've read and heard that that sort of thing happens anyway. Sometimes the male-female chemistry is just right and the amount of alcohol consumed is in that sweet spot (not too much for the lady at least).... leads to unanticipated results. 
Now if this has started happening to you with regularity or increased frequency, that would be interesting.
How many times had you run an 8 / 4 day cycle when you got that reaction? It's a long thread and had a hard time finding the situation you describe again.

Thanks for your feedback!

Sorry for not responding earlier, I missed this post.

Frankly, I've had an experience of similar magnitude exactly the week prior to this one, but even more public. Although, true enough, the women in question did consume alcohol, but the one from the linked post was faaaar from being blotto. The one the week before, was quite inebriated by the end of the night out, though.

I believe the alcohol may have made the women more disinhibited for sure, but DMSI worked its magic as well - I've been using these programs from the very first iteration (back when it was called Develop an Aura of Sexual Irresistibility ); with each version, it becomes more obvious whenever they kick in.

I've been getting fun, visible results pretty much once per week/once every two weeks ever since that kicked in. Sometimes from more than one female at a time, heh. There's a fairly good chance the current version of the program is going to start resulting in direct, all the way situations given enough exposure.

Thanks for the further detail/summary. Very helpful. I find the language 'kicks in' interesting. I guess the program includes some kind of particular 'triggering situation' (for lack of terminology) that particularly causes the aura (or the snipers?) to become operative or at least more noticeable. Does this vary from person to person, I wonder? Do we each sort of choose or design our own triggering situation or is that in the 'code'?

Is it designed to create 'situations' at parties and social gatherings or does it also trigger at grocery stores and airports? Does that make sense?

Maybe Shannon will wade in.

[rono]

@Shannon

How important is it to have NO gaps in the listening?

Depending on various circumstances, it will take me between 45 minutes and 2+ days to figure out the ideal ASRB for each program.  It can actually require more time than building the program did.  If it was not sufficiently important, I would not do that much work on that one point.

e.g. if I get a phone call and I was listening to the loop on my phone does that mean I need to start over or just resume where I left off? Should I roll back and pick up a couple minutes before the interruption?

Life happens, and few of us can predict phone calls and plan ahead.  When life happens, do your best to minimize the interruption and then just keep going.  Don't add time or try to start over.

If I need to switch devices from one I'm using at my desk to my phone and I'm in the middle of a loop, does it do any harm to more-or-less switch to where I left off on the new device?

You can switch without major issue by setting your "switching to" device to a specific point say a minute or two ahead of what is currently playing, and then turning it on and the other off at that point in time.  I suggest you do this during a period of silence in the subliminal audio.  You can see where these periods are by loading up the hybrid or ultrasonic tracks in Audacity.  Audacity is a free audio editor that is available for Linux, Windows and Apple operating systems.

Thank you for this, Shannon! Just the answers I needed. I'll download Audacity and make a note of the ideal momentary breakpoints. Much appreciated.
I may have posted similar questions in a recent post, we overlapped... so feel free to ignore them.
It's nice to know I haven't been 'breaking the rules' too badly.
My next question is simpler...
Is there any harm in turning off the loop in the middle? e.g. I have finished listening to the 4 loops but forget to turn it off after the 4th one until I'm about 1/3 to 3/4 of the way through it. Is this an issue or should I listen through to the end of the ASRB section on that 5th time through?

Hi Shannon,
Thanks for this. I have already looked at the sub in Audacity and identified the periods that are good re-start points. This will take the guesswork out when I have those unavoidable interruptions.

[Have at ye]

Thanks for the response Have at ye...

I have not read anyone in the forums sharing the kind of outcomes you describe. If you have had some, or can point me to them, I am very interested in the nature of the changes it introduces to your mentality and behavior, as well as how you feel. 

Thanks for enhancing the warning. I am being very vigilant and will watch for hints at danger signs. I know her quite well so I'd be VERY surprised if she were to suddenly start going out on me or to respond to male attention in any overt way. Still, I'm keeping watch....

https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Who-d...#pid231056 - here, for instance. And when I say "drag me to the bathroom" to make out, I do mean it in a very... direct way. She grabbed me by the shirt and used force.  We only stopped enjoying ourselves upon noticing there's no lock on the bathroom door (don't ask, I don't know either).

Some people have also reported even more "all the way" situations every now and again on the various versions of DMSI. You'd have to dig into the forum archives.

Glad you guys are enjoying yourselves, though.  BTW., should you be interested, I believe the new Life Tune Up 5.5g  has an "improved love-life" module among all its other modules, so that could be an option to use in a committed relationship as well, I believe.

Hi Have at ya,

I did read that report, but it sounded like a one-off and if one is out looking and open for action I've read and heard that that sort of thing happens anyway. Sometimes the male-female chemistry is just right and the amount of alcohol consumed is in that sweet spot (not too much for the lady at least).... leads to unanticipated results. 
Now if this has started happening to you with regularity or increased frequency, that would be interesting.
How many times had you run an 8 / 4 day cycle when you got that reaction? It's a long thread and had a hard time finding the situation you describe again.

Thanks for your feedback!

Sorry for not responding earlier, I missed this post.

Frankly, I've had an experience of similar magnitude exactly the week prior to this one, but even more public. Although, true enough, the women in question did consume alcohol, but the one from the linked post was faaaar from being blotto. The one the week before, was quite inebriated by the end of the night out, though.

I believe the alcohol may have made the women more disinhibited for sure, but DMSI worked its magic as well - I've been using these programs from the very first iteration (back when it was called Develop an Aura of Sexual Irresistibility ); with each version, it becomes more obvious whenever they kick in.

I've been getting fun, visible results pretty much once per week/once every two weeks ever since that kicked in. Sometimes from more than one female at a time, heh. There's a fairly good chance the current version of the program is going to start resulting in direct, all the way situations given enough exposure.

Thanks for the further detail/summary. Very helpful. I find the language 'kicks in' interesting. I guess the program includes some kind of particular 'triggering situation' (for lack of terminology) that particularly causes the aura (or the snipers?) to become operative or at least more noticeable. Does this vary from person to person, I wonder? Do we each sort of choose or design our own triggering situation or is that in the 'code'?

Is it designed to create 'situations' at parties and social gatherings or does it also trigger at grocery stores and airports? Does that make sense?

Maybe Shannon will wade in.

The aura is modulated to affect people you find sexually attractive to the degree you find them sexually attractive (based on a set of criteria, IIRC); so it's got the magical effect of "kicking in" harder and faster the more attractive a person you encounter, haha. This obviously works a bit differently for different people, because people can have different tastes. There's a Short Range Sniper (which works all the time), and then there's the "vision range" sniper (which affects people within your range of vision).

EDIT

As to "creating situations", yes, it has a "manifestation" module. It's described in detail on the product description page, I think.

[rono]

Hi All, (continuing DMSI 3.3.2 off-label experiment)

Day 6 (continued)
I'm not remembering much to add here. I did have a phone call / counseling session with one of my daughters and I felt unusually passionate about the topic (it was about how she should talk to a friend that was messing up her marriage). For third-party things, I usually am rather dispassionate. I wonder if DMSI is putting me more 'in touch' with my feelings?


Day 7
I'm not sure this is an intent of the program, I don't remember if it was stated. My own sex drive has increased. Perhaps a function of FRM doing its job? Increased libido is definitely a welcome thing for me. It seems like it would be hard for those who are hoping to get sex out of this program.
Last night I checked in with the wife to see where she was arousal-wise. She felt like she needed some, so this am at 0 dark thirty we had a quick, intense time together that felt exceptionally good for both of us. I was aware of being horny throughout the night. She was marginally more handsy than usual and seems to enjoy touching me more than she did prior to DMSI (good job DMSI!). There is also more passion in her touch--less tentative. As an aside when parading around the house, she seems to want me to notice her more. She acts disappointed if I don't comment or touch her periodically.
Went to the gym this AM and there were more women there at the time I went that usual. Some I found attractive. And I did get looks and smiles from all the attractive ones, others seemed to ignore me. The eye contact was not what I would call 'lingering' but it was a longer moment (or moments) than usual under the circumstances. The smiles were bigger than are typical for those situations. However, the look in the eyes seemed to be saying "What's happening here?" and they did not rush away, but in each case they had another place to go work out after a couple of minutes. I assume this is the aura+sniper.  So far it's all perfectly healthy because I am a friendly and somewhat out-going guy. I like making eye contact with strangers and exchanging smiles. So this was a real plus this morning and felt good.
I assume the ladies affected were in my 'target type' but must have been in relationships, or the effects aren't strong enough for them to make indications of interest or to flirt. This is fine with me. If I just get further eye contact and smiles and greater general warmth in interactions, this will meet my personal specs perfectly. It will help on airplanes and in restaurants, etc.

Now listening to my 2nd loop in Hybrid mode on headphones while in an online meeting. I definitely feel like it's doing something. I feel a heaviness, sometimes a shakiness. But definitely feeling more appetite. Thing is, it's hard for me to change my habits and eat more. Feeling hungry but not having a taste for food (as in my stomach hurts, but nothing sounds good) is a weird feeling. Until this recent flu, I always had a great appetite. DMSI seems to be extending that effect.

[Shannon]

When you are executing, DMSI uses a HUGE amount of energy to do its thing. That means it needs to constantly source energy to do it's thing, and the safest way to get the majority of that energy is food.  "Nothing sounds good" sounds like some part does not want to cooperate with that for some reason.

As to your previous questions:

I guess the program includes some kind of particular 'triggering situation' (for lack of terminology) that particularly causes the aura (or the snipers?) to become operative or at least more noticeable. Does this vary from person to person, I wonder? Do we each sort of choose or design our own triggering situation or is that in the 'code'?

DMSI uses a hybrid of two things to define the "target audience".  First it uses your interest and attraction levels, and second, it uses a specific script that is designed to both refine the target group and limit who is targeted to avoid issues with age or significantly involved females who would not otherwise choose to act on that influence because they want to preserve their existing relationship.  It's been very hard to advance the program to achieve its goals while preventing it from being a bull in a china shop with married and engaged people, and people who have serious committed relationships otherwise.

When you encounter someone who fits the end result of that filtering, the program will fire one or both snipers.  The short range sniper only fires on the single most attractive person who fits, and only while they are within 200 feet.  But it will fire at 100% for as long as they are within that range.  The Standard Sniper can fire on any number of people who pass the filter, and it fires proportionally to how attractive they are to you.  

So if you are in a room with a 10, 2x9's and 5x8's, all will be hit by the standard sniper as long as they pass the filtering tests designed to prevent you from interfering in someone else's committed relationship.  If the 10 passes, she would be who the SRS fired on; if not, then one of the 9's; and if they don't pass, then one of the 8's, etc.

Is it designed to create 'situations' at parties and social gatherings or does it also trigger at grocery stores and airports? Does that make sense?

As stated it is designed to manifest into your life people who fit the criteria to fire on and be affected fully.  This is part of why I am so keen on couples not using it.  Of course you can choose not to respond inappropriately should such people show up, but it becomes dangerous.

In social situations, it only acts to affect those who pass the test to be more attracted to you to the degree that you are attracted to them.  But one of the biggest challenges I have faced with this is not only preventing it from stepping on toes for committed relationships, but maintaining the free will of the affected, while making it achieve it's goals.  Those two are a big part of why progress has been so slow.

[rono]

When you are executing, DMSI uses a HUGE amount of energy to do its thing. That means it needs to constantly source energy to do it's thing, and the safest way to get the majority of that energy is food.  "Nothing sounds good" sounds like some part does not want to cooperate with that for some reason.

As to your previous questions:

I guess the program includes some kind of particular 'triggering situation' (for lack of terminology) that particularly causes the aura (or the snipers?) to become operative or at least more noticeable. Does this vary from person to person, I wonder? Do we each sort of choose or design our own triggering situation or is that in the 'code'?

DMSI uses a hybrid of two things to define the "target audience".  First it uses your interest and attraction levels, and second, it uses a specific script that is designed to both refine the target group and limit who is targeted to avoid issues with age or significantly involved females who would not otherwise choose to act on that influence because they want to preserve their existing relationship.  It's been very hard to advance the program to achieve its goals while preventing it from being a bull in a china shop with married and engaged people, and people who have serious committed relationships otherwise.

When you encounter someone who fits the end result of that filtering, the program will fire one or both snipers.  The short range sniper only fires on the single most attractive person who fits, and only while they are within 200 feet.  But it will fire at 100% for as long as they are within that range.  The Standard Sniper can fire on any number of people who pass the filter, and it fires proportionally to how attractive they are to you.  

So if you are in a room with a 10, 2x9's and 5x8's, all will be hit by the standard sniper as long as they pass the filtering tests designed to prevent you from interfering in someone else's committed relationship.  If the 10 passes, she would be who the SRS fired on; if not, then one of the 9's; and if they don't pass, then one of the 8's, etc.

Is it designed to create 'situations' at parties and social gatherings or does it also trigger at grocery stores and airports? Does that make sense?

As stated it is designed to manifest into your life people who fit the criteria to fire on and be affected fully.  This is part of why I am so keen on couples not using it.  Of course you can choose not to respond inappropriately should such people show up, but it becomes dangerous.

In social situations, it only acts to affect those who pass the test to be more attracted to you to the degree that you are attracted to them.  But one of the biggest challenges I have faced with this is not only preventing it from stepping on toes for committed relationships, but maintaining the free will of the affected, while making it achieve it's goals.  Those two are a big part of why progress has been so slow.

This is a great series of explanations! I was not able to interpolate these things from previous posts and descriptions I found. Maybe things are just finally sinking in.

The 'target audience' thing is great, because if I'm not that interested in others, I won't get the 'hits'. That is reassuring that I'm on a good track. I can only imagine the complexity you have to deal with to refine the scripting, etc. to prevent damaging relationships. I appreciate your care on this--especially since we don't have a window into exactly what is being said. I understand very well the power of properly structured suggestions since I have done a bit of hypnosis and studied it for several years now.

The theoretical examples you gave of how the snipers work is just what I needed to grasp what's going on there. Thanks.

The curious thing that I don't remember reading about before (probably that I didn't have the eyes for it) is this 'manifestation' thing. So this makes a change to your 'aura' or thinking or whatever that actually works to 'draw' or 'magnetize' people that meet your ideals into your life? I can definitely see how this would be dangerous. e.g. A guy or gal is happily married in a normal marriage, and then this manifestation thing succeeds in bringing some celebrity that one idolizes into his/her life and open to romantic relationship. Do I have that right? If so, if I see that part  working, it will likely be time to move on to a new subliminal. That would be downright spooky. Have any of the users seen this actually happen?

So the snipers, etc. work in *all* social situations. Not just parties, and conferences, but also in shops, restaurants and airports, correct? It sound like that is what you're saying.

Also, Shannon, I am loving the energy this thing gives me. Normally, when I'm operating at this energy level I'm usually exhausted from it after a few hours. I've been good for several days now with no sign of crash in sight. Sure, I get tired, but I love the way it feels. It's almost like it's better than caffeine or a pre-workout drink. The energy goes all day and then sort of shuts down or turns itself down when I lay down to go to sleep. I'm assuming this is because you designed the 'energy flooding' to go directly to fat stores, sunlight and food, rather than say forcing the adrenals to work overtime. Also, I might add, the energy has a wonderful libidinous edge to it. Libido powers so much of what a man does (though most don't realize it) it really enlivens me.

DMSI 3.3.2 is, without a doubt, the most interesting sub I've tried, ever. Still being ever-vigilant.

[rono]

Shannon or Ben,

How important is keeping the full 4 days off?

As it falls, I'll be spending the 4th day off on the plane which would be a perfect time to listen to the subs, was thinking of shortening the 'break'...

[Shannon]

The curious thing that I don't remember reading about before (probably that I didn't have the eyes for it) is this 'manifestation' thing. So this makes a change to your 'aura' or thinking or whatever that actually works to 'draw' or 'magnetize' people that meet your ideals into your life? I can definitely see how this would be dangerous. e.g. A guy or gal is happily married in a normal marriage, and then this manifestation thing succeeds in bringing some celebrity that one idolizes into his/her life and open to romantic relationship. Do I have that right? If so, if I see that part  working, it will likely be time to move on to a new subliminal. That would be downright spooky. Have any of the users seen this actually happen?

The manifestation module does not interface with the section of modules that generate, modulate and trigger the aura at all.  It is designed to cause your deep subconscious to find those people who are most responsive to the effects the program has on you, and cause your "life paths" to cross so that they can be affected - if they fit the response profile for the target audience.  There is no distance limiter set, but usually people will find that it works most with people who live physically closest to you.  There have been some cases of this module working reported, but I think most of the people using it are either not executing it, or when they do, they self sabotage on other aspects of execution.

So the snipers, etc. work in *all* social situations. Not just parties, and conferences, but also in shops, restaurants and airports, correct? It sound like that is what you're saying.

Correct.  If you encounter someone who fits the criteria, the snipers will fire.  Even if you encounter someone who is only visible to you in a photograph or video (Standard Sniper), and even if you cannot see or otherwise consciously know they are there (Short Range Sniper).

Also, Shannon, I am loving the energy this thing gives me. Normally, when I'm operating at this energy level I'm usually exhausted from it after a few hours. I've been good for several days now with no sign of crash in sight. Sure, I get tired, but I love the way it feels. It's almost like it's better than caffeine or a pre-workout drink. The energy goes all day and then sort of shuts down or turns itself down when I lay down to go to sleep. I'm assuming this is because you designed the 'energy flooding' to go directly to fat stores, sunlight and food, rather than say forcing the adrenals to work overtime. Also, I might add, the energy has a wonderful libidinous edge to it. Libido powers so much of what a man does (though most don't realize it) it really enlivens me.

The adrenals are not intended to be affected at all, actually.  The entire energy sourcing is intended to be external, so that you use as little personal energy as possible.  I don't want it to affect the hormonal or glandular/endocrine systems at all in terms of sourcing energy.

The only source of energy that it uses that is personal energy is your sexual energy, which it significantly magnifies in ways that again should not physically tax your body at all for chemistry, etc.  It uses this energy to help power the program, and also to help motivate you to achieve the goals of the program.  I'm glad you enjoy that aspect of it.

Shannon or Ben,

How important is keeping the full 4 days off?

As it falls, I'll be spending the 4th day off on the plane which would be a perfect time to listen to the subs, was thinking of shortening the 'break'...

If you are just starting to use the program, follow the instructed days on to days off patterns.  You need to know how it affects you when you do that.  A big part of why we have those days off in the ASRB2 is not just to allow your subconscious to rest, but to more fully execute and clear out any "queue" of instructions that it may have been unable to process previously.  The ASRB2 is important for your health and your execution.  In many cases, execution improves during that time off.

Not everyone gets the same results from it, and so over time you can start experimenting with other options, but I suggest that for the first 1-3 months, you follow the instructions exactly.