06-03-2018, 02:19 PM
(06-03-2018, 12:50 PM)Snoop Wrote:(06-03-2018, 11:45 AM)Shannon Wrote: You're free to try more loops now. Give 7 a shot, see what you think. That seems to be the popular thing to do right now.
Will take a systematic approach in figuring out the optimal loop number by incrementally increasing loop number on a weekly basis. This may take me to 7 or I may find the optimal number at a lower or higher value. Will start at 3 next week.
Out of curiosity have you ever considered the possibility that the information input rate from the subs may have exceeded one's brain capacity to absorb and process said information?
I know that it has not. Beast 16 pumps about 335% of this amount of data into testers' heads per unit of time and has a higher rate of P6 impact. It works quite well. In fact it has an even more challenging goal to achieve than DMSI.
Input data density isn't the issue.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!