(03-24-2017, 11:24 PM)Athena Wrote: Ha ha unfortunately (?) I DO like sex. I mean, society mostly kinda tells women NOT to be sexual, although it also tells us to act and dress sexual but not to actually BE sexual (confusing much?!) But yes I do like sex. I really do sometimes wish Shannon would make a sub for romance and ooh la la your suggestions there sound SO divine!!
Enjoying sex, and being romantic? I envy whoever's going to be your next lover.
Well, it's unfortunate that we are still stuck with several thousands old customs that was driven from men's insecurity in confirming that a child was his (up until recently, there really was no good way to confirm that the child is the men's child), issue of heritage (related to confirming the child's bloodline), and the issue of STD (although, if STD is the reason, men should have equally been sexually repressed. I argue that men have been sexually repressed as well (I kinda feel like that there is a different dynamics of repression), but not the same degree as women have been. Hopefully this is not against the rule 4..... It can be quite grey area.
For my taste though, I would want my girlfriend/wife/lover to love having sex, and can easily achieve orgasm. Well, I'd love to have many sex (sadly that hasn't been my case), and that I would like her to experience the joy that the act brings. (I'm not selfish here. I want her to enjoy that.)
I suppose many guys are going to be similar. Therefore, I don't think it's a bad thing. Yes, it's unfortunate that you must have had difficult times due to society's conflicting norms, but it isn't an unfortunate quality for a relationship. (Well, I suppose it can be different, depending on the type of the guy you're in a relationship with. Back in my country, I heard that after a few years in a marriage, guys often wish their wives would leave them alone, instead of asking for sex. ) You just need to get the right man. Of course that's the difficult part. (Sigh)
(03-25-2017, 07:31 AM)Athena Wrote: Lol!!! Like even though I LOVE LOVE ❤️ this
idea for a sub & wish Shannon WOULD make it,
I am not sure where the irritability bit comes from.
Let's hope that Nox will clarify what he meant by irritability part. (As I wrote, he might have meant irresistiblity)
At the same time, I can think how it can be irritable for a lover to be romantically/sexually irresistible. I thought about it a bit, and imagined if my girlfriend/lover/wife to be maximum sexually/romantically irresistible. It'd be so good, but so irritable at the same time as her presence would be soooooo distracting that I wouldn't be able to do anything other than doing something romantic or having sex.
(03-25-2017, 07:31 AM)Athena Wrote: Can I have
romance WITHOUT the guys or me getting
irritable?
I'd say yes, depending on the person.
(03-25-2017, 07:31 AM)Athena Wrote: I do love SW72hw's replies though
(Name sounds like a London postcode!)
Speaking of it, it does sound like a postcode of UK and Canada, and I did a search. It is apparently a postcode in London! (SW7 2HW) I want to clarify though. I didn't have an intention to make that a case. (This was an ID made by my mom when I was young, first getting started with internet, and setting up an email address and such. I stayed with it as I lack creativity in naming things.) Perhaps, it's a destiny that I go and hang out in that spot eventually in my life? (According to Google search, it's where Embassy of Venezuela is...... But there are ton of shops and restaurants around it. Or could this mean that my lover is going to be a Venezuelan? )
