Damn... Nox revealed my spelling mistake (irritability as opposed to irresistiblity )...... Now given that, I wonder if he intentionally made that same mistake.
However, if that is not a mistake and that being maximum romantic for guys results in being irritable, I guess it reveals an interesting insight about male female dynamics in a relationship. (Assuming this is the case, I wonder many guys would feel the same if the case is reversed.)
If Nox made a mistake and that he meant to say irresistible, I guess it also reveals something interesting: I believe that Nox is using DMSI (sexually irresistible) and that this makes him also romantically irresistible. I guess sex is a good catalyst for romance in a committed/involved relationship. This also reveals an interesting male female dynamics: if a guy is sexually irresistible he is also romantically irresistible (given that he is in an involved relationship.) I wonder if the reversible is same. (Does a woman being sexually irresistible equate to romantically irresistible for a man in a relationship?)
However, if that is not a mistake and that being maximum romantic for guys results in being irritable, I guess it reveals an interesting insight about male female dynamics in a relationship. (Assuming this is the case, I wonder many guys would feel the same if the case is reversed.)
If Nox made a mistake and that he meant to say irresistible, I guess it also reveals something interesting: I believe that Nox is using DMSI (sexually irresistible) and that this makes him also romantically irresistible. I guess sex is a good catalyst for romance in a committed/involved relationship. This also reveals an interesting male female dynamics: if a guy is sexually irresistible he is also romantically irresistible (given that he is in an involved relationship.) I wonder if the reversible is same. (Does a woman being sexually irresistible equate to romantically irresistible for a man in a relationship?)
