02-06-2022, 12:19 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-06-2022, 12:20 PM by AbundanceCH.)
(10-15-2021, 11:30 PM)Johannesbrst Wrote:I think you misunderstand what Greek said. What he described are the traits that most females are attracted to on a biological and evolutionary level that's deep within their programming but most won't ever admit. But the traits you described can also apply for a dominant man so it's not one or the other.(08-17-2021, 12:09 PM)GreekGod22 Wrote: Mark Manson is very much wrong on his whole concept of vulnerability and emotional connection. Women are attracted purely to dominance & pre-selection.
Emotional connection does not equal attraction.
And women do have casual sex a lot, and sleep with a guy without needing a connection. They are far from being angels.
I used to believe there are 2 types of women:I was very wrong and naïve thinking this. All women are attracted to the same traits in a man: dominance, preselection, social skill / competence, looks.
- shallow women, who have more casual sex and go for "bad boys"
- higher quality women, who don't do hookups and need an emotional connection with a guy, just like in Hollywood romantic movies.
I can assure you that you can connect on a much deeper level with a woman by opening her up sexually and make her be comfortable sharing / acting her biggest fantasy with you.
And women develop emotions after the sex has happened. You don't attract her by connecting with her emotionally.
Forgive me for being scepticle but as soon as someone writes that something is based "purely" on something else and isn't talking as but chemistry I find it as being a narrowed down perspective of reality. I believe that women surely can be attracted to dominant-able men with strength. But women are also good responders to developed awareness, humor and honesty. And not the "honesty" that is based on getting something from them but honesty that is based on non-neediness. That kind of honesty is scary for a man as it puts him on the line, and can communicate as much bravery as a man able to take charge in a leadership position.
A perfect example of this is Andrew Tate. He's everything Greek described. He's dominant, competent (multiple times kick boxing world champion and self made multi millionaire from nothing), has preselection from having like 6 girlfriends and being around beautiful women all the time. But he's also everything you said as well. He's brutally honest and he's famous for it, he's also funny AF while at the same time having a genius like IQ.
You misunderstand what dominance means. When we speak of dominance we speak of a female being attracted to a man who can lead her and the relationship. It's not physical dominance but rather dominance through guiding her into becoming the best version of herself.
Someone that is great at teaching this is Coach EO. He has a series on leading the relationship and gives great advice on becoming that man that can lead a female properly (but he first has to make sure he is a leader himself).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifoeYwnseBU