Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-28-2016

(11-28-2016, 08:26 PM)CatMan Wrote: A disclaimer, well that sounds fun and cool and hype train, lol! I'll go through with it, but I'll reserve real judgement for it's power when it's in my hands and I'm using it. I understand your feelings to CYA though regardless.

I'm curious though, are the hybrid tracks just a straight doubling of power? Or is it higher than that due to some kind of cumulative effect? Also, before several tweaks and upgrades to V3.0.1, you said it was 250%-300% more powerful than V2.5. Does this still hold or is that figure higher now to to those more recent changes?

Also, VERY exciting to hear that we will have the program tomorrow! I may be able to salvage the weekend after all. I plan to use hybrid only. The more quirples the better.

At first I thought, disclaimer, yeah, hahaha, that would be advertising gold.

Then I started realizing what people were reporting and comparing it to what I did to 3.0 and what I have planned for 3.1+, and... well... got a little nervous. Better safe than sorry.

As to the hybrid tracks, I know they are at least a doubling of the power. I haven't been able to quantify better than that but I suspect it is something like 2.5 to 3 times more powerful and maybe more.

I cannot know yet whether the increase in power the models were showing me comes from the technology improvement or the hybrid or both.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-28-2016

(11-28-2016, 08:32 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-28-2016, 08:26 PM)CatMan Wrote: A disclaimer, well that sounds fun and cool and hype train, lol! I'll go through with it, but I'll reserve real judgement for it's power when it's in my hands and I'm using it. I understand your feelings to CYA though regardless.

I'm curious though, are the hybrid tracks just a straight doubling of power? Or is it higher than that due to some kind of cumulative effect? Also, before several tweaks and upgrades to V3.0.1, you said it was 250%-300% more powerful than V2.5. Does this still hold or is that figure higher now to to those more recent changes?

Also, VERY exciting to hear that we will have the program tomorrow! I may be able to salvage the weekend after all. I plan to use hybrid only. The more quirples the better.

At first I thought, disclaimer, yeah, hahaha, that would be advertising gold.

Then I started realizing what people were reporting and comparing it to what I did to 3.0 and what I have planned for 3.1+, and... well... got a little nervous. Better safe than sorry.

As to the hybrid tracks, I know they are at least a doubling of the power. I haven't been able to quantify better than that but I suspect it is something like 2.5 to 3 times more powerful and maybe more.

I cannot know yet whether the increase in power the models were showing me comes from the technology improvement or the hybrid or both.

Oh, it HAS to be the technology improvement at a minimum. I'm sure the 2.5 figure isn't PURELY from the hybrids, as that would mean everything else you've added, and everything you've optimised, has not changed the power one iota, lol. That has to be impossible. Seems to me it's more likely it's the 2.5-3 times power increase is from the tech improvements, before the hybrids factor in, that seems far more reasonable.

So are the hybrids now 166,400 words per second minimum, instead of 83,200?

When will you know the answer for sure on just how much of an increase this version is?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-28-2016

(11-28-2016, 08:44 PM)CatMan Wrote:
(11-28-2016, 08:32 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-28-2016, 08:26 PM)CatMan Wrote: A disclaimer, well that sounds fun and cool and hype train, lol! I'll go through with it, but I'll reserve real judgement for it's power when it's in my hands and I'm using it. I understand your feelings to CYA though regardless.

I'm curious though, are the hybrid tracks just a straight doubling of power? Or is it higher than that due to some kind of cumulative effect? Also, before several tweaks and upgrades to V3.0.1, you said it was 250%-300% more powerful than V2.5. Does this still hold or is that figure higher now to to those more recent changes?

Also, VERY exciting to hear that we will have the program tomorrow! I may be able to salvage the weekend after all. I plan to use hybrid only. The more quirples the better.

At first I thought, disclaimer, yeah, hahaha, that would be advertising gold.

Then I started realizing what people were reporting and comparing it to what I did to 3.0 and what I have planned for 3.1+, and... well... got a little nervous. Better safe than sorry.

As to the hybrid tracks, I know they are at least a doubling of the power. I haven't been able to quantify better than that but I suspect it is something like 2.5 to 3 times more powerful and maybe more.

I cannot know yet whether the increase in power the models were showing me comes from the technology improvement or the hybrid or both.

Oh, it HAS to be the technology improvement at a minimum. I'm sure the 2.5 figure isn't PURELY from the hybrids, as that would mean everything else you've added, and everything you've optimised, has not changed the power one iota, lol. That has to be impossible. Seems to me it's more likely it's the 2.5-3 times power increase is from the tech improvements, before the hybrids factor in, that seems far more reasonable.

So are the hybrids now 166,400 words per second minimum, instead of 83,200?

When will you know the answer for sure on just how much of an increase this version is?

There is no longer any way to know what the WPS rate is, or even calculate a range. P5 destroys that completely by invalidating the entire concept. I wish I could explain more, but I can't. If I had to guess, I would guess the WPS now runs in the range of about 833,000 WPS minimum. But please be aware that that is PURELY a GUESS and speculation. No scientific validity at all. I'm not trying to hype or advertise here, just guessing based on what I know. But it's again, purely a guess.

I will know when I have enough user data to determine the increase.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-28-2016

Quote:Not done, Ben. Not done. You can make up for it, though. Link V3.0.1 up.

Hahaha sorry man, I thought Catman was calling me Leo for some reason, I should have thought of your sexy photo. Yes I will put the links up, when Shannon's ready Tongue

Quote:Ben, please prepare the product description page for DMSI 3.0.1. Thank you.

Ok done.

Quote:I suggest doing a month of E2, a week off, and a month of AM6 Stage 7, and a week off, and just alternate.

Interesting, i've been having urges of doing AM again during E2 where before I pretty much was like "i'm done with AM6" because i'd run it several times. And also because it only has E1 in it, now that you said that I wonder if that tactic might be valuable for me to grow in both of those directions? I'm curious why you recommended he do it like that?

Quote:on kabana?

Hahaha I haven't tried that. Not a bad idea though if I still ate it i'd try.

Anyway, these posts about DMSI are making me more excited about it myself even though i'm most likely not going to run it yet. Well maybe until the reports start coming in. If anything will stop me doing E2 it'll be 3.0.1


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-28-2016

(11-28-2016, 08:52 PM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:Ben, please prepare the product description page for DMSI 3.0.1. Thank you.

Ok done.

LOL, I was literally coming here to quote Shannon's post to ask where the page is. I can't see it, I guess it's made but no link to it yet? It'd be hot to read the epicness in the meantime at least, lol. Bah! Tongue

Tartar Sauce is not impressed! Lmao.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 11-28-2016

@Shannon
Not sure if you've answered this but here goes:

Is there a min/max limit as to how loud we can/should listen to the hybrid track without causing damage to the ears, as it contains both the ultrasonic and the masked track?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-28-2016

(11-28-2016, 08:56 PM)dweller94 Wrote: @Shannon
Not sure if you've answered this but here goes:

Is there a min/max limit as to how loud we can/should listen to the hybrid track without causing damage to the ears, as it contains both the ultrasonic and the masked track?

The hybrid track should be self regulating. It has ultrasonic and masked. Attune it volume-wise the same way you would calibrate anything else. If the ultrasonic is too loud at that point, lower the volume in small increments until it's not.

Minimum should be the lowest level of volume for the audible part being at -80 dB; maximum should be at whatever volume standard calibration produces.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-28-2016

Quote:LOL, I was literally coming here to quote Shannon's post to ask where the page is. I can't see it, I guess it's made but no link to it yet? It'd be hot to read the epicness in the meantime at least, lol. Bah!

Because I like certain types of sauce, i'll do you a favor and tell you that right now the page looks just the same but in the title it says 3.0.1.

Until the description is updated. Tongue


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - apollolux - 11-28-2016

Re Final Fantasy 8 - read the "Squall's Dead" theory, it will completely change how you perceive the events of the game. It blew my mind back in the day, and even now is pretty much the best way for me to make sense of its otherwise convoluted narrative.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Zeroxmachina - 11-28-2016

(11-28-2016, 07:19 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-28-2016, 12:04 PM)Rayhon Wrote: Will the new MIR help someone with a heart condition that is experiencing heart attacks and was supposed to die a year ago?

Unfortunately, MIR is not designed to help dead people or people who are supposed to have died already according to the infallible wisdom of their medical doctors. Energy flooding is awesome, but I am not any sort of miracle worker. That's above my pay grade. Wink

Make sure to put that into the product page or you'll be haunted by "SJW ghosts" lmfao


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 11-28-2016

It shouldn't take too much time to make the B version. It's just without the healing modules


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-28-2016

Tartar Sauce, I've got some kitty porn for you to read. Smile Here is a list of all the changes made from 2.5 to 3.0.1.

--- Changes ---
1. Optimized BIAS module
2. Optimized EGBX module
3. Added to APSX module
4. Optimized SVX module
5. Optimized NTRR module
6. Optimized and added to MAWS module
7. Optimized WNCA module
8. Optimized MIIX module
9. Optimized RIFX module
10. Optimized PPVS module
11. Added and optimized a statement in the RIFX module.
12. Added NFLGH module
13. Optimized SCMHP module
14. Added scripting to the AOSI to cause the affected to forgive and heal themselves in the ways that will result in sex with the user
15. Added scripting to the AOSI to cause the affected to forgive the user in the ways that will result in sex with the user
16. added statement to AOSI to cause affected to give themselves permission to initiate and have sex with the user
17. Optimized the Optimus Engine (Now at V3.2)
18. Optimized GFX module
19. Optimized PPVS module
20. Optimized RG module
21. Optimized IR5 module
22. Added/optimized Natural Seduction module (NSRPWF)
23. Optimized DFX module
24. Added SCMHP module
25. Added statement to SATT module to train user to, and how to, respond to the effects and responses the program gets in the right ways to achieve the goals of the program
26. Optimized SATT module
27. Added EPSS module
28. Added TAPRFR module
29. Added SIIX module
30. added AUTBFS module
31. Added RANS module
32. Added AIVOA module.
33. Added TRRM module.
34. Optimized KNXP module
35. Optimized MCMT module
36. Added/optimized FOAGP module.
37. Adjusted AOSI tuning to trigger everything required in the affected to get them to initiate and have sex, and make it natural and expected that they have to initiate and have sex with the user
38. Adjusted AOSI tuning to get affected to initiate conversations and use those conversations as an easy way to initiate and have sex with the user
39. Adjusted AOSI tuning to cause the affected to focus themselves and their urges on having sex with the user
40. Added statement to AOSI tuning which is designed to cause those affected to invalidate and ignore any and all reasons for doing anything other than having sex with the user.
41. Added statement to AOSI tuning which is designed to cause those affected to change how they classify the user from whatever they now classify them as, to someone they need to initiate and have sex with repeatedly.
42. Added statement to AOSI tuning which is designed to cause those affected to change how stunningly attractive they perceive the user to be.
43. Added statement to AOSI tuning which is designed to cause those affected to change how high status and high value they perceive the user to be.
44. Added statement to AOSI tuning which is designed to cause those affected to change how they perceive the user to being all of what they sexually desire
45. Added statement to AOSI tuning which is designed to cause those affected to change how they perceive the user to being someone who is a vastly superior choice to anyone else for sex, and someone they can't stop thinking and fantasizing about sexually.
46. Added look, feel, smell, sound, speak, act sexually irresistible to the perception of the affected
47. Added adjustments from 2.4→2.5 (energy sourcing, etc.)
48. Added FOAGP module
49. Added KNXP module
50. Added MCMT
51. Get the affected to focus themselves on achieving the goals of the program
52. (This one is secret, too much trade secret information to be able to describe)
53. Get user to choose to execute the script, cooperate, outgrow limitations
54. Improved the energy drain prevention scripting
55. Adjusted ACSMA
56. (This one is secret, too much trade secret information to be able to describe)
57. Added P4
58. Added/optimized P5
59. Added AZIF module
60. Stiffened AP code considerably
61. Added EMTAMT Module
62. Removed AZIF as conflicting/inappropriate
63. Various minor tweaks to random phrasing
64. Optimized CORE-A and CORE-B modules
65. Optimized SOS module
66. Optimized SOA module
67. Optimized MGX module
68. Added CHIORR module
69. Optimized ACSMA module
70. project self into the future in which the outcome is already being achieved.
71. Added to sniper
72. Optimized sniper


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-28-2016

(11-28-2016, 09:19 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: It shouldn't take too much time to make the B version. It's just without the healing modules

Takes the same amount of time, if not longer because of the de-tagging. There are fewer statements, but the same process must be performed to produce a subliminal and verify, encode, tag, archive, re-verify and upload.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-28-2016

(11-28-2016, 09:10 PM)apollolux Wrote: Re Final Fantasy 8 - read the "Squall's Dead" theory, it will completely change how you perceive the events of the game. It blew my mind back in the day, and even now is pretty much the best way for me to make sense of its otherwise convoluted narrative.

HAHA!

I remember reading that site WAY back.

Very intriguing take on things, I agree.