There was no sarcasm there, you seemed to imply you were an ascendant alpha and that it was a better path from personal experience, so I took that as such.
If you are no longer driven to sex, because you say you're well fed in that department, that's great for you, I'm happy. For those of us who aren't, we have a natural want for it. We agree on at least the fact that it's natural, I'm glad. I just didn't like his implication that by wanting results with women and sex we are somehow "slaves to our dicks" or we are putting women above us, simply by wanting sex, something normal and natural. And that the better path is not going after women at all, being seen as quasi-asexual, but women don't seem to understand or value that in reality somehow. My point about not living in a vacuum and needing to have results in society in reality still stands. We're doing these subs to progress in society, not to live in the mountains somewhere alone forever. So regardless of the propaganda about this, we will depend on some other external effect/validation/reaction to our development FROM others because we live and interact with a society and don't live in the mountains alone. Guys can say they're all alpha and above women, but unless they aren't heterosexual, they're lying to themselves, of course they care about women. I just think there needs to be a hard look at AM's intended idealistic focus and it's results in society, thinking about whether the new changes to the 6G version will allow this path of alpha to really succeed or not, before it is remade, that's it. And that will naturally happen, so it's cool.
My main issue was the "slaves to our dicks" thing, which I dealt with, already.
If you are no longer driven to sex, because you say you're well fed in that department, that's great for you, I'm happy. For those of us who aren't, we have a natural want for it. We agree on at least the fact that it's natural, I'm glad. I just didn't like his implication that by wanting results with women and sex we are somehow "slaves to our dicks" or we are putting women above us, simply by wanting sex, something normal and natural. And that the better path is not going after women at all, being seen as quasi-asexual, but women don't seem to understand or value that in reality somehow. My point about not living in a vacuum and needing to have results in society in reality still stands. We're doing these subs to progress in society, not to live in the mountains somewhere alone forever. So regardless of the propaganda about this, we will depend on some other external effect/validation/reaction to our development FROM others because we live and interact with a society and don't live in the mountains alone. Guys can say they're all alpha and above women, but unless they aren't heterosexual, they're lying to themselves, of course they care about women. I just think there needs to be a hard look at AM's intended idealistic focus and it's results in society, thinking about whether the new changes to the 6G version will allow this path of alpha to really succeed or not, before it is remade, that's it. And that will naturally happen, so it's cool.
My main issue was the "slaves to our dicks" thing, which I dealt with, already.