12-25-2015, 02:40 PM
I agree AP code should be limited to only educating about the piracy of the sub it is contained. Just make it fair for the consumer, and don't assume we are all pirates out to destroy you. Fair use should be acceptable and leeway should be provided. If I listen to an audio file and then give it to a relative in my household, the court in the uk isn't gonna consider me a pirate. Also at the weekends I use subs at work ultrasonic on a low volume, people have access to my workspace and a few know what sub I'm running and in tangent being exposed to the sub as they fleet in and out, they are knowingly listening as they enter and exit and therefore I'm technically knowingly exposing others and in some definitions for some individuals would be considered piracy, I don't want my $500 investment to stop working and become limited because Bill had to use my printer. Same with my flat the sub plays 24/7 in my room even when I'm not there and I know my flat mates have access to that room. They have no idea what's being played on an ultrasonic level but I do, therefore I can activate apcode just by knowing of accidental exposure because it doesn't allow fair use.
Obviously fair use doesn't include acts like illegal downloading, uploading to any file share mediums, creating physical copies for commercial or public use or distribution.
Obviously fair use doesn't include acts like illegal downloading, uploading to any file share mediums, creating physical copies for commercial or public use or distribution.
