I've been following all the talk about OF 5G, and maybe that's what I need. I was so sure about running ASC 5G (or 6G?) when this run of AM6 ends in January. The first time around, AM6 helped me realize that low confidence is literally the root of all my problems. The flashes of confidence that AM6 has given me are equivalent to seeing in color, and realizing by comparison that you've been living black and white. It also makes black and white more difficult to be in. After 1 5/6 runs of AM6, I would equate my resting confidence level to muted colors, and of course the goal is to turn up the vibrancy.
So why OF?
I struggle with premature ejaculation. It has to do in part with conditioning. Years of speed-jacking to porn will do that. It has to do with confidence; it is very much connected to a deep-seated belief that I am not worthy of sexual pleasure with attractive women. And resulting from these things, it has to do with fear. I'm afraid of coming too soon, and it's to a point where the fear and expectation of the problem results in the problem. It's difficult to draw a line that separates premature ejaculation itself from the fear and expectation that it will happen. And therein lies the conundrum.
The tricky part about subs is determining which of tackling an issue directly, indirectly, broadly, or with laser-like focus will result in the most effective outcome. Will destroying the fear (OF) surrounding premature ejaculation cripple the legs that this problem stands on? And how does that compare to bolstering confidence (ASC) to such an extent that, as it snowballs and become self-reinforcing, it pushes fear into irrelevancy? And how do both of those compare to OPE which aims to tackle the issue of premature ejaculation directly and explicitly?
A similar but separate question (that deserves a separate answer) would be to ask on broad terms: Does pruning fear allow for the outgrowth of confidence, or does the outgrowth of confidence stunt fear?
And it wouldn't be a proper noodle cooker if I didn't include the insight that: My fears result from a lack of confidence, which results from being overweight in childhood and adolescence.
Let it be said that as determined as I am to conquer PE this year, I'm very much interested in the effects that ASC and/or OF will have on every aspect of my psychology.
These are the mental laps I've been running.
So why OF?
I struggle with premature ejaculation. It has to do in part with conditioning. Years of speed-jacking to porn will do that. It has to do with confidence; it is very much connected to a deep-seated belief that I am not worthy of sexual pleasure with attractive women. And resulting from these things, it has to do with fear. I'm afraid of coming too soon, and it's to a point where the fear and expectation of the problem results in the problem. It's difficult to draw a line that separates premature ejaculation itself from the fear and expectation that it will happen. And therein lies the conundrum.
The tricky part about subs is determining which of tackling an issue directly, indirectly, broadly, or with laser-like focus will result in the most effective outcome. Will destroying the fear (OF) surrounding premature ejaculation cripple the legs that this problem stands on? And how does that compare to bolstering confidence (ASC) to such an extent that, as it snowballs and become self-reinforcing, it pushes fear into irrelevancy? And how do both of those compare to OPE which aims to tackle the issue of premature ejaculation directly and explicitly?
A similar but separate question (that deserves a separate answer) would be to ask on broad terms: Does pruning fear allow for the outgrowth of confidence, or does the outgrowth of confidence stunt fear?
And it wouldn't be a proper noodle cooker if I didn't include the insight that: My fears result from a lack of confidence, which results from being overweight in childhood and adolescence.
Let it be said that as determined as I am to conquer PE this year, I'm very much interested in the effects that ASC and/or OF will have on every aspect of my psychology.
These are the mental laps I've been running.
Under heaven all can see beauty as beauty only because there is ugliness.
All can know good as good only because there is evil.
All can know good as good only because there is evil.
