10-18-2015, 02:59 AM
(10-17-2015, 11:46 PM)CatMan Wrote: Mini,
You make some interesting points. Very intriguing. I appreciate your experience and detail, a lot of it seems to make sense.
But, if it was true, then I think my SM3 run wouldn't have been so terrible. I would've easily bombarded and overrun my original garbage programming and have amazing results with SM3 because the first 10 days or so and my original programming would be overwritten, and then my mind would be ignoring all the further input as the SM3 stage was fully burned in and working perfectly, especially with the hours I've pulled. Is that what you proposed? I think that's been what you've theorised. But, it's late, forgive me if I've misunderstood lol.
But, that hasn't been the case, the run has been awful and has made me question the ability of magnets to deliver actual real world results even. So, I don't know if this theory is legit. No offence at all bud, you do make a very interesting argument for revision or at least consideration of changing the schedule. I'm just speaking from my own experience, especially with SM3. I have most definitely NOT burned in each SM3 within 10 days or so, the run has been massively disappointing, and I clearly do respond well to subliminals from a personality standpoint, my personality isn't the type that stonewalls subs obviously, given my history with ASC 5G and AM6. But, this SM3 run has been dreadful, so I don't think I fit into this theory.
However, I seem to be an unusual case with SM3. So this theory could very well prove to be true. I always appreciate new takes on things. That's how progress is made in everything, not just subs.
Honestly Catman, I know at times people on the forums have looked for flaws in your situation, making blames at overexposure etc. I don't personally think you did anything wrong in your run and my reason for believing this is results in general with sm3 are so few and far in between. There's really not been a lot of people who have had amazing results and my theory for this isn't that the subliminal is flawed or anything or the listeners are flawed in any way. My reasoning is the sub is far too complex, it's trying to change too much at once, hence why repeated listenings always provide an increase in results. But repeated listenings at 32 days per stage when the sub is powerful enough to incorporate change in a 3rd of the time. So once each stage has directly bombarded you enough you will naturally shut off out of resistance, the listener doesn't want to change and subconsciously when you start to change and the material itself stays the same your subconscious takes a lazy approach and says "I've done this so I'm gonna ignore it" obviously it hasn't incorporated everything because the sub contains so much and is overloading your subconscious which is why it shuts off. Repeated runs in shorter bursts I think would be the answer to this. And I am planning on testing this very soon.