09-25-2015, 09:57 PM
i don't see the point in dividing our brainpower into two separate goals. Like I can kind of understand if someone wanted to use programs that were similar together, but at the end of the day it's still two different goals.
in relation to two different 6g subs together: First of all, I think it would confuse our mind. second, how would we be able to process that potent of input simultaneously and NOT be thrown off balance while using it?
If 6g subs are to be as potent as shannon describes the new technology, it would make the most sense to use all our mental powers to achieve one goal, then move onto the next instead of taking the shotgun approach.
and to be fair, i don't agree that only being able to use 1 5g sub at a time is a deficiency, considering the potency. not to mention I have a feeling these subs are drawing energy from sources that we can't really explain :')
in relation to two different 6g subs together: First of all, I think it would confuse our mind. second, how would we be able to process that potent of input simultaneously and NOT be thrown off balance while using it?
If 6g subs are to be as potent as shannon describes the new technology, it would make the most sense to use all our mental powers to achieve one goal, then move onto the next instead of taking the shotgun approach.
and to be fair, i don't agree that only being able to use 1 5g sub at a time is a deficiency, considering the potency. not to mention I have a feeling these subs are drawing energy from sources that we can't really explain :')
