(09-23-2015, 06:18 PM)Shannon Wrote: Some good points have been made in both sides of the argument. I primarily don't want to have a 4G and a 5G version of the same program because it tends to lead to erroneous thinking in how the programs are perceived. That and the fact that if the flagship version takes years, what's the distant second cousin going to do?
On the other hand, I benefited a lot from BASE 3G, which I created for myself. I could not have hoped to save up $500 when I did that because bills were so tight. Saving money wasn't a question of putting away and just not buying coffee, it was... rent or something else. I'm gonna pay rent! So I understand.
It is a challenging call on my end what to do.
Maybe then the 4G program description should make clear how much more powerful the 5G version is and how much longer it would take to get results with 4G. In the same way there must be said how much more the 5G version covers. So people who can afford and who are serious about it would choose 5G anyway. Or maybe renaming the 4G in BASE light or something.
