09-19-2015, 07:53 PM
(09-17-2015, 11:15 PM)Alpha360 Wrote:(09-17-2015, 09:56 PM)heavysm Wrote: Shannon's last post about BASE 2.1 has thrown me for a loop. There was an error in the 2.0 script?? Where was this mentioned? I'm almost on stage 3 lol
I guess it will work anyway, relax it is certainly something that won't affect the program, maybe 1% effectiveness. He would have warned the users otherwise. Maybe he made a mistake and he was talking about the breast program.
There's nothing to worry about. The error in the script leaves out the subject of the statement; if the specifics of the rest of the adjusters were not what they are, the grammar would cause the subconscious to either ignore the statement entirely because it made no sense, or it would imply that you should use others to get what you want. However, because of the modifiers I use in the full statement, it makes no sense at all grammatically, and is therefore simply ignored. And no, it's not breast enlargement; it's BASE. Believe me, I would have called for a full stop if there was any danger, while I created a replacement and a fix-it program for any unwanted programming effects. But there is nothing to worry about. It is effectively a nonsense statement the way it was worded, and is just being ignored.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!