04-26-2015, 11:37 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-26-2015, 11:41 AM by QuantumEnthusiast.)
What shannon is saying from what I understand is this.
Going from most dominant/obvious programming to least:
1. Let's say you listen to BASE then AM. The most dominant or obvious programming would be the programming that BOTH of those programs helped with. Meaning if they both had repeated statements for OGSF, that'll be the most obvious programming because BOTH programs contributed to this programming.
2. The programming that's obvious secondly is the programming of any sub you've run before, eg. Overcoming Fear, that is being added on to by the current run of AM with overlapping categories.
Meaning, OF and AM have overlapping programming/categories, so it's the next dominant/obvious programming.
3. What would be noted next is the programming that is UNIQUE to the second sub that you're listening to, in this case AM. Meaning, the programming/categories that is unique to AM and doesn't overlap with any other subs are what's dominant/obvious next.
4. Lastly comes the programming that is UNIQUE to BASE that are active but not getting any attention from the currently running AM sub.
All the programming is active, just that the programming that has statements/categories overlapping with previously run subs will be more obvious than the statements/categories that are unique to whatever sub you're running currently, which is more obvious than the statements/categories that are unique to previously run sub.
To put it simply: Overlapping categories > Unique categories of current subs > Unique categories of previously run sub
Going from most dominant/obvious programming to least:
1. Let's say you listen to BASE then AM. The most dominant or obvious programming would be the programming that BOTH of those programs helped with. Meaning if they both had repeated statements for OGSF, that'll be the most obvious programming because BOTH programs contributed to this programming.
2. The programming that's obvious secondly is the programming of any sub you've run before, eg. Overcoming Fear, that is being added on to by the current run of AM with overlapping categories.
Meaning, OF and AM have overlapping programming/categories, so it's the next dominant/obvious programming.
3. What would be noted next is the programming that is UNIQUE to the second sub that you're listening to, in this case AM. Meaning, the programming/categories that is unique to AM and doesn't overlap with any other subs are what's dominant/obvious next.
4. Lastly comes the programming that is UNIQUE to BASE that are active but not getting any attention from the currently running AM sub.
All the programming is active, just that the programming that has statements/categories overlapping with previously run subs will be more obvious than the statements/categories that are unique to whatever sub you're running currently, which is more obvious than the statements/categories that are unique to previously run sub.
To put it simply: Overlapping categories > Unique categories of current subs > Unique categories of previously run sub
