01-25-2011, 12:40 PM
(01-25-2011, 12:36 PM)WildFlower Wrote: Shannon, I've been really busy, but I still intend on finding a decent, online article that covers Ken's four quadrant model sometime soon when I have more time - I've had a bit of a search but couldn't find anything that does it justice. Also I think Ken really covers the debate you raised about non-logic, logic and in the future a greater balance between the two. He call's it the Pre/Trans Fallacy, where anything post-rational is compared to anything pre-rational simply because both are non-rational - he holds that rationality isn't the be all end all and that there are higher states of perception non-reliant on logic. 'vision-logic' is a term he uses to describe what you where describing.
Very interesting. Do I differ in my belief that we will eventually balance the two and achieve the greater-than-the-sum-of-the-parts awareness, or is he saying that logic will lose out to non-logic alone?
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!