03-17-2015, 05:18 AM
(03-16-2015, 11:24 AM)CatMan Wrote: I see some comments deriding SM3 and placing the blame on it for failing, and even on Shannon for overhyping it which I find insulting and also to be blaming externally.
Depending on the filters you see the world through you can find my quotation insulting. Or you can take a step back and notice it for what it was meant to be - purely expressing a personal disappointment that Shannon's enthusiastic prediction hasn't yet been confirmed to the high degree I preceived.
I was not being (passive) aggressive, though you seem to have perceived it that way. The disappointment is general and observational - neither directed at Shannon's work, nor towards those who may have not built a strong enough AM foundation. Again, it's observational - it's just how I observed things to be up until this point, which I expressed as an answer to the thread question.
I honestly wish you and everybody following it to get the aimed results following SM, and fill in this thread and journals with glorious snippets!