(03-16-2015, 01:48 PM)Ricardo Wrote: I chose WM because it fits the lifestyle I want. I want to be popular with women and have choices. I also want them to feel deep attraction and connections with me. SM put me off for two reasons, firstly the lack of results people had and secondly if it did work as advertised it's not meaningless sex I want.
OE2 is overrated in my opinion. A decent run or 2 of AM, get the bullet points of it and either WM or SM will work fine, OE or not.
I think alot of journal failures with both magnets are down to not having a strong enough AM foundation to begin with. Whether or not it's only "meaningless sex" and not any emotional bonding at all as a result, especially from the women's side, well, I'll let you know during my SM3 journey starting next month haha
.Shannon has said before that OE or OE2 multiply a script's effectiveness by like three fold. It's a pretty powerful piece of tech. While I would say WM2 is still able to be effective, OE and OE2 definately do give a sub a big increase in effectiveness when they're used. Apples to oranges, both programs are no doubt very powerful looking at the tech in them. SM3 was merely brought out after the OE and OE2 discoveries and the discovery of the interdependency of GSF, and benefitted hugely as a result of having those techs added to it, that's all. SM3 also has OAA AND NSFM built in alongside OGSF and all the 5G techs except Slipstream. That isn't to say WM2 isn't powerful, it is, no worries my friend! Shannon has said OE and OE2 are not suited for every program, so the fact that WM2 hasn't been upgraded and he has said before that WM2 is MORE then enough to get the job done, I'd rest easy
.Apples to oranges I feel this comparison is, but I'm glad we have a choice of two fantastic programs once AM is completed. AM is amazing enough, I'm grateful for the magnets.
