You can't do that without missing a large chunk of the improvement. Stages 4, 5 and 6 are all much different than 2010's were. So technically, you *could*, but you'd be missing out on stages 4 and 5, which make the results incongruent because of the differences between 2010 and 2011.
If that's what you decide to do, and I don't recommend it, do stage 6 of 2011, take a month off, and then start 2011 from the beginning. Otherwise, start on Stage 4 of 2011. It really is worth the re-do. The difference between those two sets on the last three tracks is pretty important.
If that's what you decide to do, and I don't recommend it, do stage 6 of 2011, take a month off, and then start 2011 from the beginning. Otherwise, start on Stage 4 of 2011. It really is worth the re-do. The difference between those two sets on the last three tracks is pretty important.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
