:: Everything You Need to Know Before Asking Question ::

[GlaizenGold777]

:: For New User ::

*******

Hello everyone. I'm totally new at this. Hoping I posted this in the right place...

I'm curious about Life Tune Up.

I have met one person in 'real' life who has been using the subliminal shop products and the changes I am witnessing are incredible.

I am wanting to use Life Tune Up but am feeling a little wary...

Will I still be 'me' when I follow all the instructions and timelines for usage?

The Emotional Pain Relief freebie (thank you thank you thank you) got me through some serious çaça for the last three months... But, I haven't felt quite like myself. Maybe numb would be a decent descriptor. I went through a lot of trauma. And it is not that I 'love my pain'. It is simply that authenticity and being true to what's alive for me or in me is important. And I am wondering if Life Tune Up will take that away some how.

I guess I'm simply feeling a little afraid and was hoping for some reassurance. I think it is an amazing thing that so many people have put their trust in Shannon and what he can do. It's a beautiful thing.

Thank you for your time.

~ KiKi

We're not here to remove who you are. We are here to advance, refine and improve who you are. The aim, as I stated somewhere around here in a long explanation that you're welcome to search for, is that the programs are designed to help you transform from the base elements of who you are (which I likened to a lump of iron ore and coal) to the full potential you have (which I likened to a fine steel sword).

Because these programs are so powerful and so effective, the results they achieve can be a little scary at first. People are not used to growing and "becoming" so quickly and efficiently in some cases.

The good news is, even if I wanted to, I seriously doubt that I could change who you are with subliminals. I can provide you with the tools to grow into your fuller potential and expression of that potential, but who you are is who you are. I'm just making it easier to let go of the negative and grow into your potentials.

Change can be scary, but when you're ready to grow, nothing is going to stop you - whether you have my programs or not, and whether it scares you or not. Such is the nature of life.

Enjoy the programs. :-)

*******

I'm currently on WM2 right now but I've lately been thinking about what I want to do for when I get around to doing AM again. I'm currently thinking of Spending a entire year on just alpha in order to improve myself, after I'm done with my round of AYP subs. I've noticed that with the original version, AM5, that some people double the days they use it to 64 days per stage. I was wondering if this advisable for AM6 or not? If this is not advisable, I'm thinking of Doing another full run of AM6, take a week break, then use the refresher for about 6 months straight to make sure the results are permanent. I've already gotten about 90% of the program the first time around so I'm thinking the refresher won't put too much stress on me with 2 full run through underneath my belt.


*Edit* Thanks Maniac. Also, Chosen one, I'm actually curious as to why that is as well. Hope Shannon can give some insight on this.

In the instructions, it specifically says to run AM 5/6 at 32 days per stage. There will always be people, a lot of them apparently, who think they know better than I do now to use the program, so some people will choose to ignore the fact that I know the program inside and out and I know what I am talking about and use the program for longer. Those people are not reading or following the directions, and they do not get the intended results. If you want to get the effects that they're after with 64 days per stage, run it twice through at 32 days per stage.

If you choose to do the refresher for the second run, of course, that will be six months straight using that one stage, which is fine, but for some people may become boring. Part of why six stage sets are six stages is to prevent subconscious boredom.

*******

It's nice to see people using the program so aggressively, yet following the instructions... and getting results. Because they know what they want, they go after it, and they get it. No excuses. Balls to the wall. And they follow the instructions. Did I mention following the instructions? It really helps. Wish more people would do that. :-)

*******

... You should use it for at least 4 weeks, and for as long after that as you like. If you use it long enough, it will become permanent programming. "Long enough" seems to differ from person to person, and ranges from 1 to 6 months. Most Type B subs become long term programming in 1 or 2 months of use, from what I have seen.

As for them all working this fast, well... the Type B's all should. Type B is intended to change your thinking only. Other types may work faster (Type A [seduction subs] usually work in between 5 and 45 minutes) and Types C, D and E take longer because they're working with making physical changes or manifesting things.

But yes, everyone should try the self confidence sub. I made it free because it was so awesome for me to use and I thought everyone could benefit from it.

*******

Well, for us complete newbies - one would think that the subconcious would, or should, know.

Allow me to explain a bit. The subconscious mind knows exactly what it is doing when it resists, and it knows why it is resisting. It almost always either resists out of fear (about 80% of the resistant population) or simple blind stubbornness to be influenced one way or the other (about 20% of the resistant population).

Getting a resistant subconscious to cooperate requires some very careful efforts in the fear situation, but can be next to impossible in the stubbornness case. I have already done everything that is possible script-wise (that I currently know of) to remedy this.

In this way, the subconscious can be likened to a child, demanding that it get its way. Oddly, the subconscious does exhibit some very advanced and high level adult type responses as well, although usually in different directions. I'm still looking into what all this means.

Which is why I'm baffled at the various language subliminal products; I would have thought that one should cut it - and that a subliminal for manifesting a thing that you focus on ought to be able to be made.

One could be made to "cut it" for all languages, but there are some good reasons to build them for individual languages, including the fact that the greater specificity makes for better focus and better subconscious penetration, response and results.

But then again, I'm not familiar with subliminals and have no immediate desire to dwelve into learning about them. I'm still testing out a manifesting subliminal product, and if it works then fantastic; I'll be a happy camper and a repeat customer - and if not, well then ...so be it

Judging the usefulness and effectiveness of subliminals in general based on a Type D subliminal (manifestation) is, as I have said before, neither reasonable nor recommended. Manifestation is one of the areas I have the least control over, and while it works for most people, there are literally hundreds of variables I can neither influence nor control associated with it. There's no way for me to know when the manifestation will take place, either.

In effect you're judging whether subliminals work based on whether or not the LOA works for you in one specific instance, which is neither a very good set of data points, nor a very good test of subliminals themselves. As I said last time I answered this, use a Type B or Type B Hybrid to decide whether subliminals themselves work.

To give you an example, let's say I use a sub to attract my perfect naturally platinum blonde lover (which I did). Let's say I use it for six months, and get no results (which happened). Did the A) subliminal fail? B) LOA fail? Or C) did something else happen?

The correct answer is C. Two months later, I met the responder and started a relationship with her, and it was a very sexual relationship. (Remember, we specified perfect lover with platinum blonde hair.) What had taken place was as follows:

I used the subliminal. It started taking effect 2-3 months in, but to fulfill the specified desires, it had to actually get her to take action to move from Massachusetts to Florida, and move to the city where I live. This took a long time, considering the complexity of her situation.

There are also cases where a particular request simply cannot be fulfilled in a reasonable time, or at all, or sometimes it will be blocked for a specific period of time, etc. The LOA is a complex thing.

Trying to see if a subliminal works by relying on the LOA (secondary result) is about like trying to determine if a pillar is sturdy by looking at the state of the roof of the building it supports.

*******

... have you read '' the great little book of affirmations'' I wonder why affirmations work best with the subconscious and afformations with the conscious. And if afformations could work also with the subconscious.

I have not read that. But as to affirmations versus afformations, it's fairly simple.

First let me say I have not yet studied afformations in terms of trying them to see for myself how effective they are; but the concept behind them is fairly easily understood.

The conscious mind is the critical thinking gatekeeper. It constantly analyzes everything and it's job is to reject things that don't make sense, don't work, and are not true.

Again... the job of the conscious mind is to reject things that are not true. Present tense.

The job of the conscious mind is also partly to solve mysteries and answer questions. That's why we have curiosity.

Afformations - questions - assume a truth. Nobody asks "Why are my pants full of mosquitoes" because nobody has pants that are full of mosquitoes. It has become so ingrained in our programming that questions are always based on a truth that it is actually used in debates to mislead audiences a lot. The audience will automatically assume that any question is based on truth, and that puts the other guy on the defensive. So what an afformation does, in theory at least, is bypass the critical faculty of asking "Are my pants full of mosquitoes?" (which is the automatic response to an affirmation like "My pants are full of mosquitoes") and simply assumes the truth of the subject of the question, because otherwise, why would you be asking it?

In doing so, this is bypassing the gatekeeper, and the subconscious is now working on the assumption of truth, and seeking the answer.

Interesting thing about the subconscious: it's literal. So when it encounters a statement that it has accepted, but which is not observable outwardly, it will make the outward reality match the inner reality. In other words, it actually generates the reality it has accepted as being true, if it is not already.

Affirmations take advantage of this same phenomenon. By repetition of either, you will cause the subconscious to accept that XYZ is true. But if it is accepted, and not outwardly manifest, the subconscious will rectify that by adjusting the outer reality to match the inner reality. It does this because it cannot tell the difference between the two, and in fact, the only real difference between them is the speed at which they change.

One gets stopped by the gatekeeper when it fails the "Is this currently true?" test (affirmations), and one confuses the gatekeeper and gets through on assumption of truth (afformations).

The only thing I can see being a potential problem is asking a question and having the phrasing mis-set the intended variable. "Why am I so rich?" might set the value of "Rich" to "my current value", for instance.

*******

This concept of removing negativity is very intriguing. I once read a post from you, that the subconscious never forgets, it only changes dominant programming.

On the contrary, the subconscious never forgets anything it is exposed to. Nothing. Ever. Programming may be overridden by later programming, and will become dormant if that happens... (the "fade" effect). But the subconscious is incapable of forgetting. Periodic refreshers just re-assert the desired programming as being the dominant/primary programming. Remember, EVERYTHING you are exposed to is ALWAYS being sorted and piled. The "biggest piles" make up current active programming.

If the subconscious never forgets, that means negativity is never actually removed, it is just stays there being dormant, because it is no longer the primary programming. Until more negativity enters, then it might return as a dominant programming again, correct?

As an example lets pretend that I'm a soldier, came back from a war, and I've seen all the death and brutality that a war could cause, and this experience traumatized me, and I won't be able to forget this negative experience. If I used RNW, what kind of effect it will have on me? Will it make all my traumatizing past experience become ok somehow, because the negative attachment to it is removed?

I can't seem to wrap my mind around this concept of removing negativity, from the way you explained how the subconscious works, it seems impossible to actually remove or destroy it, the only possible option is to replace it with positivity, and make positive thinking the dominant programming.

The subconscious never forgets an experience, it never forgets data input. But polarity can be changed, separately of data. Memory of a negative will be referencing negativity, but the actual negativity can be removed. Concept versus subject. What happens when you heal from a negative experience? True healing from a negative emotional experience is, in part, letting go of the negativity of it. The reference memory to the experience having been negative does not change... but the negativity is replaced with something else. The negativity itself is released.

This is a complex and intricate subject, and explaining it is difficult, but the key is to understand that programming, polarity, and reference to polarity in memory are all separate.

In your soldier analogy, the experience will have caused trauma. The experience itself, the memory, and the trauma, are probably all going to be negative. In the case of successful use of something like RNW, you will have the negativity itself removed and replaced with something else. The negativity is separate from the experience, the memory and the trauma resulting.

This is so because the experience itself is neutral. Always. It is how we react to and interpret it that causes us to choose how it is polarized. We polarize it and then react to our reaction and the polarity we have assigned it! That leads to a cascade effect.

Let's say I am a soldier riding in a vehicle that runs over an IED and my transport is blown up. I suffer extensive shrapnel damage and lose one eye, one ear, one arm and one leg on my right side, and suffer extensive burns all over my body, but I survive.

How would the average person respond to this? It would be a huge change very quickly, which would give them psychological shock. Very little time to adjust to and process a huge change usually results in a state of shock. That shock will be unpleasant, because it is overload, and the unpleasantness will automatically be categorized as negative.

The stress of the situation has been labeled as negative. Now we have the pain. Huge pain. Is that going to be classified as positive? No, more instant and overwhelming unpleasant change, which is also classified as negative.

Next we have me waking up without all these abilities I had before. No right eye... no right ear... no right arm... no right leg. This is another huge sudden change, shock, and difference from what I had before, and it is going to be classified (automatically, based on our societal upbringing) as negative.

Now after a few years, I will have had some time to process all these changes, and if I chose to process them, I can do so in one of three ways. I can see them as a curse, negative, and this will lead to resentment, frustration, depression, more negativity. I can say to myself, "This is simply 'what is' now, and I accept it as what it is and move on with my life.", which is a neutral response. And I can say, "This is an opportunity for me to experience the world in a whole new way, to learn and grow in new ways, and to inspire others and make the world a better place for my having experienced this.", which would be a positive response.

In each case, MY CHOICE of how to respond will dictate what happens to the polarity. If I choose to respond to it in a negative way, my current experience will be negative, and I will begin increasing the negativity within me. If I respond in a neutral way, the experience may be classified as negative, but my reality will neither be enhanced or detracted from by it, and I will not have negativity or positivity as a function of my "now" as a result. If I choose to react in a positive way, the experience itself may have originally been viewed as negative, but it may then be changed to being viewed as a positive thing, and my present experience will begin increasing in positivity as a result.

The same would be true of having seen horrible things in war. The experience can be interpreted as negative, and the recorded memory of that interpretation will always be a reference to negativity, but the polarity is separate, and can be changed.

When someone uses RNW, we are telling the very literal subconscious mind to destroy negativity and replace it with positivity. If it does not resist, it will do so. That is simply a polarity reversal.

In this case, reversing polarity, we are actually referencing a monopole. My mood cannot be positive and negative at the same time, it is one or the other. A simple (non-compound and non-complex) statement cannot be positive and negative at the same time, it is one or the other. You can say "I am happy" and you can say "I am not happy", but you cannot make sense saying "I am not am happy" (an attempt at creating a positive and negative statement in one simple statement).

In essence all we are doing is polarity adjustment. That results in programming adjustment. If you have a negative acting as programming, and you destroy the negativity, the programming automatically becomes either neutral or positive.

"I am not happy." Destroy the negativity, and you have "I am ... happy."

*******