Ok. I didn't realize you were talking about offline discussions. That didn't come across.
Sorry about my comments. I actually Didn't think you were selfish at all. You just want to have something to help you. I know what I am saying may be a little counter to yours and as such, I'm probably the one being a little selfish. I've been through SM twice and i just wanted to keep focus on the ultimate goal especially if there are already a large number of items going into the program already. You are right, Shannon is the ultimate decision maker of what gets in. If your recommended programming gets in, that's cool. I will still use it, but I just wanted to offer Shannon an alternate viewpoint of a separate module to specifically focus on your particular issue. It's also possible that it may already be in the current SM2.0 because I seem to recall a prior discussion about this issue when SM was being developed. So, you are not alone. And, If that is the case then what I am saying is all out the door. You would already be taken care of.
Sorry about my comments. I actually Didn't think you were selfish at all. You just want to have something to help you. I know what I am saying may be a little counter to yours and as such, I'm probably the one being a little selfish. I've been through SM twice and i just wanted to keep focus on the ultimate goal especially if there are already a large number of items going into the program already. You are right, Shannon is the ultimate decision maker of what gets in. If your recommended programming gets in, that's cool. I will still use it, but I just wanted to offer Shannon an alternate viewpoint of a separate module to specifically focus on your particular issue. It's also possible that it may already be in the current SM2.0 because I seem to recall a prior discussion about this issue when SM was being developed. So, you are not alone. And, If that is the case then what I am saying is all out the door. You would already be taken care of.
