10-13-2012, 05:52 AM
(10-11-2012, 09:12 AM)jamboree Wrote: The one word that i seen in scripts is "manifest". The assumption is that everyone may know what that means. When i see that word, the first thing that pops into my head is something that sort of magically appears. Now the author may have meant to convey something different than what i was thinking. Maybe it was meant that something is attracted into your life rather than magically appear. Now just note, I'm not debating as to what the proper meaning is. I'm pointing out that everyone may conjure up meanings different than what the author intended and its possible that this may have an effect on the effectiveness of the sub. Or maybe my own personal first impression definition is within the ballpark that it shouldn't matter. Just throwing out some thoughts. :-)
Yeah when I hear the word manifest I think about conjuring in terms of magic. Thats quite an idea there to consider how we conceptualize will affect our result. Perhaps everyone's reality in terms of the programs is personally their own. Maybe the nature of our manifestations are more specific than being of merely positive and negative energies.
(10-11-2012, 01:06 PM)Sean Wrote: Shannon also has a theory that the subconscious can access the superconscious, which has access to all knowledge. In that case, the subconscious can learn the meaning, but it slows progress. I believe this is one of the reasons why he recommends doubling the time if English is not your native language.
Its interesting to see that Freud had his psyche structure broken down into 3 parts and that 3 aspects are also acknowledged in terms of how we perceive and use the programs. That makes sense for foreign users although I wonder how that may affect manifesting subliminally. I suppose the brain has to work that much harder.
(10-12-2012, 09:46 PM)Shannon Wrote: In the case that a word is not in common usage, I always define it explicitly within the script itself. "Charisma" is a good example of this.
I believe based on my experiments that the subconscious can access the superconscious, which I believe is akin to a sort of collective consciousness for all human minds. This allows one to know about anyone else on earth at the speed of thought, if you ask for the information in the right way. If the superconscious cannot answer the question I believe it is sent up a level to what I call the Universal Awareness, which is the source of all knowledge. At that point, the answer will be given if it does not disrupt the person's goal and reason for being alive. However, accessing these higher levels of information and awareness is not always available for easy use for various reasons.
In cases where a word is not consciously known, it is very likely that the subconscious knows the definition, either by having access to current life memories, or on a much deeper level, past life memories. I don't think accessing past life memories is always readily possible, however, as they are forgotten for good reasons. Therefore, I always use the simplest, most specific and precise wording I can, and I always explicitly define the words that may not be commonly known, or may have a variable understanding.
English not being the first language is another good reason for this, and yes, using one program at a time.
What a profound explanation. Even though I know nothing about the subject matter the whole idea of Universal Awareness seems to make an argument for the idea of having a Soul and higher planes of being. I suppose I like the idea of an actual "after" as opposed to darkness and poof your gone. Off topic but thats what this reminds me of haha.
The explicit defining of the words is certainly something I wouldnt have though of and looks like it does a perfect job of tightening loose ends.