Gotcha, thanks for that explanation! So, since counter-attack is not an option, and since we do need to be efficient with energy to power these new programs, then perhaps adding an absorption/draining shield would help? In this scenario, the user utilizes a shield that actively seeks to drain the incoming negativity from the aggressor and uses it to feed the program's execution. In such an instance, not only is the aggressor losing energy, but the "victim" or shield bearer, in this case, now actively gains from it. Potentially, wouldn’t this dissuade the aggressor because now:
a) they're losing energy attacking the user
b) the user is not only unaffected but now even HAPPIER in the face of this opposition
Is such an option possible or feasible?
EDIT: Perhaps even the "Black Hole Shield" would be useful.
I know you're super busy Shannon, I posted the above earlier in regards to the DRS vs Grounding Shield issue but you probably didn't see it. No worries, cheers!
a) they're losing energy attacking the user
b) the user is not only unaffected but now even HAPPIER in the face of this opposition
Is such an option possible or feasible?
EDIT: Perhaps even the "Black Hole Shield" would be useful.
I know you're super busy Shannon, I posted the above earlier in regards to the DRS vs Grounding Shield issue but you probably didn't see it. No worries, cheers!
