09-13-2012, 12:01 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-13-2012, 05:10 PM by AwesomeYoungDude.)
(09-13-2012, 08:58 AM)Shannon Wrote:Quote:Shannon, nice job on TUW-P18 (Wife Material). You nailed it. Not only does she have a desire for sex but she has an increased desire to satisfy me. Wow once again nice job. Gents the experimental alone are worth the cost of WM.
Thank you. I created TUW-P18 to help me meet women who were worth considering for a serious relationship. The original intent was to use it to get them to identify themselves by response, and then turn it off and work to get them interested in me overall. This program rapidly identifies and arouses high quality women who are wife material, and it is an absolute killer for that job.
I weren't kidding when I said those programs were worth the cost of admission all by themselves.
Quote:Shannon, I now understand your backlash comment. A warning to those who use the experimental indiscriminately. If the target is unable to fulfill her desire, her sexual tension which started as desire for you will turn against you. I'm laughing to myself as I type this. Based on my experience, I can imagine me being around females that one day want me really bad, but then the next day treat me like dirt because of unfulfilled desire.
There is something I need all of you guys to understand here. The word you use to describe the woman or women you expose to them is very telling of your thought processes. If you're thinking of them as "victims", stop using the experimentals right now, because you're only going to get yourself, and possibly me, in trouble with what you'll be doing with that sort of thought process.
If you're thinking of them as "targets", it's better but not by much. We're not assaulting anyone here... or we shouldn't be, anyway. Good thing I went out of my way to make sure they always have the freedom to make the choice as to what they are going to do with their arousal.
If you're thinking of them as "subjects", now you're getting somewhere. This term means you have respect for them, and are considering their wellbeing in the matter, not just trying to take advantage of them sexually.
The goal is an effective aphrodisiac, not an easy way to manipulate people into having sex with you without their consent. Fortunately, I foresaw this problem and made the programs always leave the subject the ability to think for herself and make her own decisions based on conscious cognitive ability and critical thinking, which can and does override the sex drive when necessary to preserve her safety and reputation.
How would you feel as a man if a woman was using one of these programs and causing you to respond without your own permission to having sex with her? Always remember that you must treat others with the respect and consideration you want from others for yourself.
Remember that you all represent me by using these products. If your choices and actions lead to bad reputation for me, this business may fail, and then you won't have me building these things. So have a care how you represent me and my products through your use of them, please. This is my reputation and livelihood on the line as well, gentlemen.
Quote:Just as a side note, I've started AM 5.0. You nailed that one also.
I'm glad you are in agreement. I am amazed at AM 5.0.
Quote:Lastly, Shannon, how is the hospital bill coming.
I am going to be able to pay it off, but I am uncertain what the best way to do that is just yet. I think probably half this month, and half next month, just to be on the safe side, in case sales are not as good as expected. Thanks for asking.
Shannon, I'm glad you understood and amplified the intent of that paragraph. No one likes prolonged sexual tension (until its released).
Additional information. PSE-1 creates tension but that subsided upon gratification or within 24 hours. Not with the experimental. The sexual tension remained.
AYD