06-20-2021, 05:00 AM
Post #34 as an issue. Almost the entire first paragraph is just begging for someone to start an argument over it, and that is against the rules. Please adjust that paragraph so that that is not the case. You're welcome to do as you see fit in your life, but we don't want people deciding to argue over it, and I have already had to stop one person. And please stop mentioning that personal choice in the future, as it will always be a hot button issue whether or not to do that and who said what supporting it and the credibility of who said what and the science behind which side's argument, and whether it's valid science or the author is this or that. Better if you just leave that out, because it's an incendiary topic. I appreciate that.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
