11-15-2019, 06:53 PM
(11-14-2019, 07:59 AM)Shannon Wrote: Your comment about underperformance is just a dig. There's no reason we would make DMSI a Type G program, and DMSI is experimental. We also know that other programs get very different results. So there was no need for that comment other than to try to get my goat, I think.
Thanks for the other info on this topic earlier.
To be fair, I had no idea if DMSI would be, or would NOT be, one program considered for this. Seemed reasonable it could be, given the implications of making guys taller, younger-looking, changing facial appearance possibly to be more attractive, even some talk of certain genetics being more fear-prone than others I've heard of, making a bigger penis, what have you. So given that, I felt it was fair to state that the program is struggling already now, so adding such a massive intangible, one that would be astonishingly difficult on it's own, never mind along side DMSI's existing difficulty to make work, would be too much to deal with.
That's literally all I meant. No "dig" or what have you. Just honesty and frankness.
Looking forward to DMSI V3.3.3, with or without this, Shannon. Hope you have a good day!