04-24-2019, 06:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-24-2019, 06:46 PM by Have at ye.)
I'm calling it a break for this ver. of DMSI *right now*.
Today (as I met for some lacanian psychonalaytic action with that girl I mentioned above, I'll call her "foxy psychoanalyst" because I the prior designation doesn't work for me, lol, and this one's very apt), it turned out another one of my more responsive responders has been experiencing chronic health issues pretty much *since I started running this version*. That's a fourth, it's a thing. Nothing too serious fortunately (in her case - f. in., designee "sweet little aristocrat" has had it quite a bit worse AFAIK, but she does have *considerable* ego, lol), but nonetheless. [EDIT: oh yeah, she wants to meet again. It was good to see her, really, heh]
Besides, should be interesting to see how things unravel in "bloom" mode, as well as Shannon's been working like a beast lately, so I guess the next version's TID should be starting to kick in soon enough.
Apart from that, it was a fun evening, I went to a little party thereafter (I didn't invite designee "foxy psychoanalyst" as I had a suspicion that my ex would be there, and she was, and I really don't want the drama) where I met another one of my responders which is always niice. Anyroad, I've also got some Lacanian musings to share, but I'll do it in a day or two as I need to collect my thoughts. You know that thing how in response to subliminal programming which is instructing the user to make major changes, the subC tends to react in ways that equalize it with death? Yeah, Lacan had a couple of things to say about this, a little interaction between what he called "narcissistic death of the subject" in response to achieving the subject's "object of desire". More to come, could be useful.
Today (as I met for some lacanian psychonalaytic action with that girl I mentioned above, I'll call her "foxy psychoanalyst" because I the prior designation doesn't work for me, lol, and this one's very apt), it turned out another one of my more responsive responders has been experiencing chronic health issues pretty much *since I started running this version*. That's a fourth, it's a thing. Nothing too serious fortunately (in her case - f. in., designee "sweet little aristocrat" has had it quite a bit worse AFAIK, but she does have *considerable* ego, lol), but nonetheless. [EDIT: oh yeah, she wants to meet again. It was good to see her, really, heh]
Besides, should be interesting to see how things unravel in "bloom" mode, as well as Shannon's been working like a beast lately, so I guess the next version's TID should be starting to kick in soon enough.
Apart from that, it was a fun evening, I went to a little party thereafter (I didn't invite designee "foxy psychoanalyst" as I had a suspicion that my ex would be there, and she was, and I really don't want the drama) where I met another one of my responders which is always niice. Anyroad, I've also got some Lacanian musings to share, but I'll do it in a day or two as I need to collect my thoughts. You know that thing how in response to subliminal programming which is instructing the user to make major changes, the subC tends to react in ways that equalize it with death? Yeah, Lacan had a couple of things to say about this, a little interaction between what he called "narcissistic death of the subject" in response to achieving the subject's "object of desire". More to come, could be useful.
"A man who is doing his True Will has the inertia of the Universe to assist him." - A. Crowley
