01-29-2019, 08:02 PM
@Shannon
I know you have a lot on your plate, but would you consider expanding the scope of the FRM module in LTU to include ANY and ALL fears a person has?
I'm aware that FRM in each sub is (by neccessity) aimed specifically at the goals of that sub, and that in the case of LTU it seems resonable that the FRM would remove the majority of fears a person has. But then again, the subconscious mind always seems to find loopholes and work-arounds. Maybe explicitly stating in the script "all of my fears" would plug these loopholes?
LTU, being the broad general-purpose sub that it is, seems to be a golden opportunity for you to test a full-scope FRM.
I know there might be saftey concerns, but then again - there always are. Removing fear does not equal removing compassion or logic.
So, please consider this, and if you can, try running this concept through your models.
I know you have a lot on your plate, but would you consider expanding the scope of the FRM module in LTU to include ANY and ALL fears a person has?
I'm aware that FRM in each sub is (by neccessity) aimed specifically at the goals of that sub, and that in the case of LTU it seems resonable that the FRM would remove the majority of fears a person has. But then again, the subconscious mind always seems to find loopholes and work-arounds. Maybe explicitly stating in the script "all of my fears" would plug these loopholes?
LTU, being the broad general-purpose sub that it is, seems to be a golden opportunity for you to test a full-scope FRM.
I know there might be saftey concerns, but then again - there always are. Removing fear does not equal removing compassion or logic.
So, please consider this, and if you can, try running this concept through your models.
"I love it when a plan comes together!"
- John "Hannibal" Smith
- John "Hannibal" Smith
